@NannyGythaOgg
I think, bearing in mind that, on MN at least, 95% appear to be in favour it should be an opt out not opt in.
Do you mean that everyone should be presumed to want assisted dying unless they opt out?
How does this square with your later statement that 'I do not believe it should happen without consent'?
This is a very long way from people saying, 'this is what I would want for myself and it doesn't affect anyone else.'
In countries where assisted dying is legal only a tiny minority of people opt for it. E.g. in Oregon, which has been held up as a good example, 2-300 assisted deaths out of around 45,000 total deaths in 2021.
People do change their mind and any law must allow for that:
In this survey, a small proportion of terminally ill patients seriously considered euthanasia or PAS for themselves. Over a few months, half the patients changed their minds.
jamanetwork.com/journals/jama/fullarticle/193281
I think the national estimate is at least 80%.
This figure needs breaking down. It comes from a survey that showed 49% of respondents strongly supported the following (really quite restrictive) proposal and 35% somewhat supported it:
A proposed new law would allow terminally ill adults the option of assisted dying. This would mean being provided with life-ending medication, to take themselves, if two doctors were satisfied they met all of the safeguards. They would need to be of sound mind, be terminally ill and have 6 months or less to live, and a High Court judge would have to be satisfied that they had made a voluntary, clear and settled decision to end their life, with time to consider all other options.
yonderconsulting.com/poll/dignity-in-dying/
I am also an atheist and have no idea why you are talking about god and the afterlife. I would, however, expect the ECtHR to judge very harshly any government that allowed its citizens to be coerced into assisted death with the kind of slapdash laws that you seem to be proposing.