Meet the Other Phone. A phone that grows with your child.

Meet the Other Phone.
A phone that grows with your child.

Buy now

Please or to access all these features

Chat

Join the discussion and chat with other Mumsnetters about everyday life, relationships and parenting.

Ukraine Invasion: Part 34

988 replies

MagicFox · 23/10/2022 21:29

Welcome all πŸ‡ΊπŸ‡¦

OP posts:
Thread gallery
80
Fladdermus · 01/11/2022 13:19

I heard on the news last night, either Channel 4 News or Newsnight, that the aid the UK has spent on Ukraine isn't 'new' money that the government has come up with but is in fact money diverted from the foreign aid budget. Every penny spent on supporting Ukrainians, including those in the UK, is taken away from someone else who had been promised it. The UK government are the only country doing this. They are despicable.

Autumnnewname · 01/11/2022 13:25

Fladdermus · 01/11/2022 13:19

I heard on the news last night, either Channel 4 News or Newsnight, that the aid the UK has spent on Ukraine isn't 'new' money that the government has come up with but is in fact money diverted from the foreign aid budget. Every penny spent on supporting Ukrainians, including those in the UK, is taken away from someone else who had been promised it. The UK government are the only country doing this. They are despicable.

What foreign aid though.?

Fladdermus · 01/11/2022 13:32

Autumnnewname · 01/11/2022 13:25

What foreign aid though.?

They did mention some of the projects which have been cut but I've forgotten. Sorry.

Autumnnewname · 01/11/2022 13:38

If the foreign aid is being cut from countries who openly cheerlead for Putin then I'm ok with that.

PerkingFaintly · 01/11/2022 14:05

It's potentially really dangerous to cut foreign aid elsewhere.

Just think for a moment how Putin will sell that to countries affected: "Those Western warmongers are hurting you with their war of aggression against Russia. I told you they didn't care about you. But it's OK, I'm your friend and will look after you: here have some stolen Ukrainian grain which the West has been hindering me shipping. We anti-colonial multipolarists have to stick together against the imperialists but don't forget I'm your leader."

Igotjelly · 01/11/2022 14:08

Autumnnewname · 01/11/2022 13:38

If the foreign aid is being cut from countries who openly cheerlead for Putin then I'm ok with that.

I think it’s more nuanced than that though. Just because a country’s leadership β€˜cheerleads’ for Putin that isn’t the same as the population supporting the Ukraine invasion. In general it’s the World’s poorest who suffer from these decisions.

One area that’s seen money diverted is funding for developing countries to combat Climate Change, including food aid for those suffering climate induced famine.

Also need to be mindful that the UK Government have chosen to include a number of β€˜leftover’ Covid vaccines in their aid budget.

More cynically In terms of what this means for optics and soft power is important too. For example the UK’s aid to Ethiopia, Somalia and Yemen fell this year by almost 55% whilst China’s contribution increased substantially in the same period.

thereisonlyoneofme · 01/11/2022 14:34

I believe the UK spends more on foreign aid than nearly any other country

Igotjelly · 01/11/2022 14:46

The UK is recognised as one of the leading support countries and I think has a foreign aid budget total in the top 5 across the World. Of course we largely have to address issues of our own making, be it through ramifications of colonialism or climate change. We should be proud to support other countries.

Ijsbear · 01/11/2022 14:58

Im afraid that 'Foreign Aid" is a joke

www.theguardian.com/global-development/2022/oct/29/billions-in-foreign-aid-never-leaves-britain-under-sunak-rules-analysis

The UK aid budget is around Β£11bn, with about Β£4bn going to multilateral institutions including the World Bank.

Of the remaining Β£7bn, which is administered by the UK directly, more than half will be spent domestically in 2022, including about Β£3bn on housing refugees, according to CGD’s analysis.

RedToothBrush · 01/11/2022 15:05

NOΓ‹L AT NOELreports
Pro-Russians in Svatove about the situation in and around the city:

"As it is, everything is not very good in our direction. Slowly giving up territory."

Stellar Wildcat AT WildStellarCat
Locals seem to have reported russians slowly leaving all surrounding villages and either leaving trough Svatove, or trying to stay in the town itself.

Russians are suggesting that Ukraine won't even try an assault on Svatove and instead will just go straight past it to the north and the south...

RedToothBrush · 01/11/2022 15:07

twitter.com/haynesdeborah/status/1587460958749970438

Sober Ben Wallace thread on defence spending

MagicFox · 01/11/2022 16:19

RedToothBrush · 01/11/2022 15:07

twitter.com/haynesdeborah/status/1587460958749970438

Sober Ben Wallace thread on defence spending

Not great rumblings, let's hope Sunak does stick to the 3%

OP posts:
blueshoes · 01/11/2022 16:27

RedToothBrush · 01/11/2022 12:17

Today Russia has announced the 'completion of their partial mobilisation'. So what happens next is going to get interesting, especially when you start to dig down into the rates of personnel losses.

The Russian Troop losses for the last week in particular look like they are something else - especially Saturday, if the Ukrainians are to be believed...

I've just gone through twitter feed of the Ukrainian General Staff to look at the casualty figures they've put out. The furthest I can go back on the account is 23rd September.

Today +650
31 Oct +620
30 Oct +950
29 Oct +550 (Sevastopol attack)
28 Oct +480
27 Oct +320
26 Oct +480
25 Oct +480
24 Oct +470
23 Oct +400
22 Oct (no figure given on AT GeneralStaffUA)
21 Oct + 100
20 Oct +370
19 Oct +430 (civilian 'evacuation' from Kherson announced by Russia)
18 Oct +530
17 Oct +320
16 Oct +300
15 Oct +400
14 Oct +500
13 Oct (no figure given on AT GeneralStaffUA)
12 Oct +270
11 Oct +240
10 Oct +370
9 Oct +440
8 Oct +380 (Kerch Bridge Bombing)
7 Oct +350
6 Oct +330
5 Oct +200
4 Oct +370
3 Oct +320
2 Oct +500
1 Oct +530 (Lyman liberation)
30 Sep +500
29 Sep +430
28 Sep +400
27 Sep +550
26 Sep +500
25 Sep +400
24 Sep +240

I've also found a graph of reported Russian dead (from Ukrainian official sources) right back to the start of the war.

There is a marked uptick in Russian Deaths from about 21 August. That surprised me as its slightly earlier than I'd expected, however it probably does make sense: the Ukrainians launched their Kharkiv Offensive on 6 September, so a couple of weeks of bombardment is probably what you'd expect.

For context some key moments:
19 July The Antonovsky bridge hit.
27 July The Antonovsky bridge closed to civilians after being hit
31 July Russia accused Ukraine of a drone strike on the HQ of the Black Sea Fleet in Sevastopol, injuring five and cancelling Navy Day celebrations.
9 August 12 explosions at the Russian Saky military airbase in Novofedorivka, Crimea.
10 August President Zelenskyy said that "this Russian war...began with Crimea and must end with Crimea - with its liberation". Previously he had said that he would accept peace with Russia if they fell back to their 24 February positions
15 August - Ukraine claimed to have struck a base being used as HQ for the Wagner Group with a HIMARS rocket.
16 August - Explosions reported at an arms depot at Maiske, in northern Crimea. The Russian Defence Ministry blamed the blast on "sabotage". According to a Ukrainian official, the explosions were carried out by an elite Ukrainian military unit
20 August - Russia claimed Ukraine had carried out a drone attack on the headquarters of the Russian Black Sea Fleet in Russian-occupied Crimea.
A suspected car IED killed Darya Dugina, a daughter of Alexander Dugin.
26 August Ukrainian forces struck the hotel being used as a barracks and killed 200 paratroopers in Luhansk
29 August Ukraine reportedly launched a counteroffensive in the south.
10 September Kupiansk and Izium liberated
21 September Partial Russian mobilisation announced
23 September Russian 'referedums' in Kherson, Luhansk, Donetsk and Zaporizhzhia

At the moment we are in what is being termed the third phase of the war. Arguably I think we are about to tip into a new stage.

@RedToothBrush great dive into the numbers of RU deaths and linking them to key events by date. Very much appreciate your pulling this together.

blueshoes · 01/11/2022 16:29

MagicFox · 01/11/2022 16:19

Not great rumblings, let's hope Sunak does stick to the 3%

We live in the times we do. All belts are being tightened. Ben Wallace will have to make do with the hand he is dealt. I am reassured with Ben at the helm of the UK Defence Ministry that he will do the best he can for Ukraine within those limits.

MagicFox · 01/11/2022 16:39

Agreed, but didn't Wallace suggest he'd resign if the 3% wasn't managed?

OP posts:
RedToothBrush · 01/11/2022 16:47

MagicFox · 01/11/2022 16:39

Agreed, but didn't Wallace suggest he'd resign if the 3% wasn't managed?

Resigning and threatening to resign are two completely different concepts as many years of watching politics will testify to.

blueshoes · 01/11/2022 16:48

I read somewhere that Ben has relaxed on the 3%, which the latest tweet seems to support. Fingers crossed he gets what he needs.

MagicFox · 01/11/2022 16:54

and I suppose it was in the context of the leadership debate too

OP posts:
Ijsbear · 01/11/2022 17:01

Yes, thank you very much.

MissConductUS · 01/11/2022 17:39

Ukrainian special forces have infiltrated an airbase on Russian territory and blown up three of their best ground attack helicopters. There's a video of them strolling into the area, affixing the explosive charges, and strolling out again.

Ukrainian Commandoes Raid Airfield Deep Inside Russia, Destroy Frontline Helicopters

Amazing. This is what happens when there is a complete loss of military discipline. The base security troops were no doubt valiantly drinking or sleeping at the time.

notimagain · 01/11/2022 17:46

Ijsbear · 01/11/2022 08:43

@notimagain Ru must be running low on Cruise missiles? there have been reports of them using older and older stuff, would that apply to Cruises too?

@TheCountessofFitzdotterel I think that might be answered by RTB's post on the truth, belief in govt and powerlessness. At this point if people simply have their heads down and feel zero ability to affect anything, maybe they are simply hoping that the draft will not scoop them up. The Kremlin puts out this shit in order to keep the sense of hopelessness up.

Ru were starting to use anti-ship missiles in a more general role/less accurate roles in the Summer and I'm sure the situation won't have improved..

www.usni.org/magazines/proceedings/2022/october/lessons-russian-missile-performance-ukraine

ReleaseTheDucksOfWar · 01/11/2022 17:52

Yeah. Alarming news that they are getting ballistic missiles from Iran tho :(

<Ijsbeer>

notimagain · 01/11/2022 17:56

MissConductUS · 01/11/2022 10:37

@notimagain, I do recall the controversy with the Patriot missiles when they were used in Iraq, primarily against Scud missiles. The Patriots would sometimes damage the Scud or push it off course without disabling the warhead. The Patriot crews would often fire up to four rounds to try to ensure a warhead kill. Since this was all quite some years ago, I'm sure Raytheon has improved them.

I'm sure they have..

Without dragging things off topic again I was just trying to emphasise that (as you know) you can prove/disprove pretty much anything by selective use of stats.

Claims of missile systems having 100% "efficiency" sounds impressive to the lay reader but in reality are completely meaningless without an explanation of the metrics used. I can't think of a single SAM or Air to Air Missile with a demonstrated kill probability (Kp) of 1.00 (100%), I doubt that has changed.....
..

ReleaseTheDucksOfWar · 01/11/2022 18:28

I do presume that since Ukraine claim that, and generally they seem to try to stay true to the spirit of the facts as well as the rules, that the claim of 100% efficiency is for at least several incidents

MissConductUS · 01/11/2022 18:30

notimagain · 01/11/2022 17:56

I'm sure they have..

Without dragging things off topic again I was just trying to emphasise that (as you know) you can prove/disprove pretty much anything by selective use of stats.

Claims of missile systems having 100% "efficiency" sounds impressive to the lay reader but in reality are completely meaningless without an explanation of the metrics used. I can't think of a single SAM or Air to Air Missile with a demonstrated kill probability (Kp) of 1.00 (100%), I doubt that has changed.....
..

Correct. There is no magic bullet that will prevail in all situations. When the US Navy first deployed the rotary cannon CIWS units, they performed brilliantly until you threw too many targets at them. Then they locked up and wouldn't engage any of them. That's been fixed, fortunately.

I'm looking forward to the deployment of directed energy weapons in an air defense role. That will require new tactics, but will certainly change the rules of the game.