I'm curious as to why you are being so deliberately inflammatory regarding people posting literally the facts of an event that was well documented on SM. Nobody has claimed JM cackled or rubbed her hands together with glee, it's instead dramatic hyperbole that you're adding to the several stories now of what people witnessed.
I'm unsure as to why people can character assassinate whoever they please on MN (Celebrities, husbands, sisters, mothers et al) yet you have a particular annoyance with those of us who have witnessed the constantly shifting narrative of JM who has arguably benefitted financially from these stories.
By all means believe what you want, continue to support who you choose, but people are entitled to an opinion, as are you. People are responding to you because you are responding to them. We don't all have to agree. This is a discussion forum where people discuss topics - and is no different to a user posting about their husband being shit and receiving a chorus of LTB. The only difference is in this case, the husband rarely has an opportunity to present evidence. The literal stacks of evidence of inconsistencies, poor public behaviour, rude and aggressive tweets, dog piles when someone dares question the narrative is all part of why I and other people, either rightly or wrongly, have based an opinion. At what point do you believe someone is 'deserving' of questioning?
Poor mental health isn't an excuse for these behaviours. Especially when these conditions are largely self diagnosed and are pulled out to mitigate potential fall out. Donate to JMs PayPal, tweet your support, but it's OK to both align politically with JM and also cast doubt on the narrative, and fear vulnerable people are being exploited.