I don't see anybody defending her? Most people can see she was abusive as well. Maybe it was "reactive abuse" on her part {hmmm}
I keep seeing people mention she was abusive to previous partners but I have only seen her ex-wife deny that was the case. There were rumours of JD abusing Kate Moss, I heard a story about him kicking her down the stairs. None of the exes that were supposed to testify that he was not abusive took the stand in the end during the last court case. So who knows. In any case, what happened in a past relationship does not necessarily have any bearing on any others.
The court case (s) are about whether JD was abusive, not whether AH was. Because it's him that keeps dragging it through the courts. He has been found guilty by the London High Court so I don't see how anyone can still believe he is a victim of AH's "conniving" behaviour.
Can I also point out that she was 25 when they married and he was pushing 50. That's a power imbalance already before adding in his vast wealth, fame and legion of minions running around after him.
I'd like to see testimony from some witnesses that are not on his payroll. Yesterdays guy lived rent free in an expensive NYC penthouse and was paid by JD to spend months painting pictures. Some people might consider the guy a freeloader and would think he is not likley to say anything that may alienate JD and stop any further "perks/handouts".