Meet the Other Phone. Child-safe in minutes.

Meet the Other Phone.
Child-safe in minutes.

Buy now

Please or to access all these features

Chat

Join the discussion and chat with other Mumsnetters about everyday life, relationships and parenting.

Anyone in the US? Did you watch the Meghan interview?

999 replies

Tankflybosswalkjam · 07/03/2021 07:08

Apparently it’s already been broadcast!

OP posts:
Thread gallery
11
Wondermule · 07/03/2021 23:25

I think they’re united by a common enemy (everyone else) and besides that don’t have much in common. Once they stop locking horns with the press and his family, there won’t be much to say to each other.

AlwaysLatte · 07/03/2021 23:30

Look how miserable Harry, Wills & Kate look, whilst Megan looks absolutely serene.
She's an actress

DeRigueurMortis · 07/03/2021 23:34

@Kikitheparot

I think this photo says it all.

Look how miserable Harry, Wills & Kate look, whilst Megan looks absolutely serene.

She’s got what she came for (a Prince and world wide fame), and seems blissfully unconcerned about the breakdown of her husband’s relationship with his family.

It doesn't say anything other than what you want it to say.

Pick another picture 5 mins earlier at the same event and it would "say" something very different.

I don't mean to pick on you, rather it's indicative of many posts in many threads that use flimsy "evidence" to justify a position they've already "cemented" in their thoughts.

Or alternatively re: a post upthread that sounded very convincing about the earrings in M's favour but missed crucial dates/information that's very pertinent and raises a perfectly reasonable question about what the hell was she thinking wearing them?

Or edited clips of tabloid journalists being cited as suddenly "credible" sources when a 1 minute lift from an hour long anti H&M diatribe (that was bloody awful, biased and naive (at best) about racism) is used as "proof" that the RF is out to get the couple.

A picture at Wimbledon that showed nothing more than two women walking down some steps having "significant" implications as to their feelings/motivations towards each other.

I could go on.....

Interested in this thread?

Then you might like threads about this subject:

Coronateachingagain · 07/03/2021 23:36

@Wondermule

I think they’re united by a common enemy (everyone else) and besides that don’t have much in common. Once they stop locking horns with the press and his family, there won’t be much to say to each other.
No there is some new insight. Thanks for the perspective. Rings the bell.
SugarfreeBlitz · 07/03/2021 23:36

I think Kate looks very happy and Megan is an actress so who can say.

Coronateachingagain · 07/03/2021 23:37

@Wondermule

I think they’re united by a common enemy (everyone else) and besides that don’t have much in common. Once they stop locking horns with the press and his family, there won’t be much to say to each other.
And that should be the family strategy - to keep close to him
VladmirsPoutine · 07/03/2021 23:39

@Wondermule you might very well be right - once they stop locking horns with the press it'll be all over for them.

I agree, Meghan and her infantile digs at the press - the same press that said she was 'straight outta compton', linked her liking of avocados to fuelling war, genocide and murder, described her black mother as coming from the wrong side of the 'tracks', accused her of attention seeking for holding her bump when she was pregnant (which incidentally didn't seem to provoke any ire when Kate did it), called her 'uppity' - a very loaded term to use towards a black woman, denigrated her as 'woke' because being aware of racial injustice is apparently so gauche. The same press that accuses her of chasing celebrity status because as everyone knows shaking hands at parish cake sales for the donkey sanctuary and smiling at NHS workers is so glamorous.

But you're right, once she stops locking horns with the press everything will be fine. If only she could just leave them alone they'd probably just go do their racism elsewhere - there must be other prominent Black women who can pick up the baton where Meghan's left off.

VladmirsPoutine · 07/03/2021 23:43

She's an actress

Ah yes... she's an actress so is clearly able to disguise her secret scheme to take over the world. This is all very pathetic tbh.

DitchedBitch · 07/03/2021 23:45

I'm going to respect the privacy they so desperately want and not watch this. Perhaps everyone needs to ignore this interview and Netflix documentary when it comes out, in full support of what they want.

DeRigueurMortis · 07/03/2021 23:52

Reportedly, iirc as that photo was taken, Harry was furious as Will had just said a not very friendly hello to Harry and then very pointedly blanked Meghan. Meghan calmed Harry, and what you see there is her pasting a good face on it (probably very fucking relieved to be leaving.

Total speculation.

When the "other camp" make claims like this there are numerous posts about how do you know what happened or didn't know you were on such good terms with the protagonists Hmm.

As you can see below I've also challenged the "other narrative" as well.

Blueberries0112 · 07/03/2021 23:54

“Why should that mean that MM should just accept it. None of these woman should have accepted it. ( it’s always woman who have to put up with”

Exactly, they are probably saying enough is enough. they even accused RF planned Diana to be killed. I doubt Harry liked hearing that about his family either.

donewithitalltodayandxmas · 08/03/2021 00:02

There is so much speculation on here in what did and didn't happen on both sides even reports of pw affair is only what is assumed to of happened, unless him or Kate say its happened or there are pictures its still only hearsay, same as some of what Megan has said , like some of the papers say Megan's friend says Megan said this or that, how do we know if that is true we don't. I could tell you my friend said x but I could be lying.
Its all crap and much more important things going on in the world than some other very privileged families dispute.
Just all move on live your life's and be happy and if that has to be away from your families so be it

Thewithesarehere · 08/03/2021 00:03

Oprah met Meghan once or twice before the wedding. And then they give her a seat in the choir 😛. No other family except mother (a respectable and beautiful lady by the way) and a few scattered friends but not the normal crowd you would expect. Nothing against Oprah, I think she was glad to attend and play the part.

How Nasty this post is!
Oprah is US royalty and a self-made one at that!
If Queen has turned up at my wedding, I would still have given her a prominent seat.
Threads on MM bring out the most bigoted posters. Hmm

BlueThistles · 08/03/2021 00:05

Oooh less than an hour here for it to air... Im wondering I should tune in in CBS 🤔

Nah 😎

DeRigueurMortis · 08/03/2021 00:06

@Thewithesarehere

Oprah met Meghan once or twice before the wedding. And then they give her a seat in the choir 😛. No other family except mother (a respectable and beautiful lady by the way) and a few scattered friends but not the normal crowd you would expect. Nothing against Oprah, I think she was glad to attend and play the part.

How Nasty this post is!
Oprah is US royalty and a self-made one at that!
If Queen has turned up at my wedding, I would still have given her a prominent seat.
Threads on MM bring out the most bigoted posters. Hmm

I agree.

If Oprah wanted to come to my place for tea and toast she'd get the comfy seat Grin.

Coronateachingagain · 08/03/2021 00:09

@Thewithesarehere

Oprah met Meghan once or twice before the wedding. And then they give her a seat in the choir 😛. No other family except mother (a respectable and beautiful lady by the way) and a few scattered friends but not the normal crowd you would expect. Nothing against Oprah, I think she was glad to attend and play the part.

How Nasty this post is!
Oprah is US royalty and a self-made one at that!
If Queen has turned up at my wedding, I would still have given her a prominent seat.
Threads on MM bring out the most bigoted posters. Hmm

Seriously? Herein lies the difference. Even if you had the faintest point..... which don't think applies, but even if you did, I would not invite the Queen to my wedding even if she hinted she wanted to come. Why would you. And I am a supporter. But maybe it is a British thing.
slashlover · 08/03/2021 00:11

Ah yes... she's an actress so is clearly able to disguise her secret scheme to take over the world. This is all very pathetic tbh.

An actress who is apparently both shit at it and would never amount to anything without marrying Harry, AND amazing enough to fool everyone including him despite living with him 24/7.

redspecial · 08/03/2021 00:12

that photo says nothing. a moment in time when they're standing about in a church. I always have a face like a dropped pie when in church too.

vlnr77yac · 08/03/2021 00:14

Gadzookery

Fact is different from opinion. It is a fact that all living creatures will experience pain. It is an opinion as to whether that creature lived a good life or not.

It is not unkind for me to point out the difference.

You ignore the dark hints of others that H&M will somehow reap this pain because of leaving the RF or doing this interview ... and seem not to notice that that is unkind of you. Now that's my opinion.

Thewithesarehere · 08/03/2021 00:19

Seriously? Herein lies the difference. Even if you had the faintest point..... which don't think applies, but even if you did, I would not invite the Queen to my wedding even if she hinted she wanted to come. Why would you. And I am a supporter. But maybe it is a British thing.

To be fair, if you are a supporter, I don’t think you would have turned down if you had the option to invite the Queen. I think you are lying actually and there are LOADS of Britishers who would disagree with you, including me.
However, it’s quite obvious that the Queen and Oprah are two entirely different women. However much you like the Queen, I am sure it can’t come close to what Oprah has gained in one life time. So there is no comparison at all anyway. 🤷🏻‍♀️

Mamanyt · 08/03/2021 00:21

I did not. I'm not overly interested in the Royal Family, honestly. If they are in the news when I'm watching, well and good, and I certainly wish them no ill whatsoever, but their doings and carrying-ons have no effect on my life whatsoever. I don't seek out information about them. I do have several friends who are utterly mad about EVERYTHING to do with your Royal Family, and spend a lot of time nodding my head and saying "Uh-HUH!" and "OH MY!" and thinking about what to cook for dinner.

DeRigueurMortis · 08/03/2021 00:24

@Blueberries0112

“Why should that mean that MM should just accept it. None of these woman should have accepted it. ( it’s always woman who have to put up with”

Exactly, they are probably saying enough is enough. they even accused RF planned Diana to be killed. I doubt Harry liked hearing that about his family either.

Again I agree.

One of the points that keeps being brought up on these threads is that Harry should have warned her what RF life was like.

I responded (on a now deleted thread) how the hell did he know what it was like?

As a grandson (the son bit being important) he was never subject to all that batshit rules about hemlines, collar lines, sleeves, hats, nude tights and one shade of nail varnish.

The oversight of his wardrobe was when to ditch the shirt and khakis for for a ceremonial uniform or a suit (but I bet no one policed the colour of his tie or the fit of his jacket/trousers).

As a male royal I bet the infringements of something so basic as to what colour you paint your nails ever even crossed his thoughts.

Equally the orders of precedence (basis of who has to bow/curtsey to whom) likely don't register given as a male prince he's well up the pecking order (as is M but only when she's with him, alone in a room of royals she'd get knee cramp).

I don't think these things crossed H's mind
because his experience of being royal is very different to the women who marry in (I'd make the same allegation against W).

Yes - that's speculation but I think I've a pretty firm grounding in a wealth of experience of how many men are utterly oblivious to the constraints being born a woman brings.

Coronateachingagain · 08/03/2021 00:39

@Thewithesarehere

Seriously? Herein lies the difference. Even if you had the faintest point..... which don't think applies, but even if you did, I would not invite the Queen to my wedding even if she hinted she wanted to come. Why would you. And I am a supporter. But maybe it is a British thing.

To be fair, if you are a supporter, I don’t think you would have turned down if you had the option to invite the Queen. I think you are lying actually and there are LOADS of Britishers who would disagree with you, including me.
However, it’s quite obvious that the Queen and Oprah are two entirely different women. However much you like the Queen, I am sure it can’t come close to what Oprah has gained in one life time. So there is no comparison at all anyway. 🤷🏻‍♀️

Just for the record, Oprah would be far below from the Queen in my list, if I ever was I that situation! Well obviously if Oprah wanted to come to my wedding there would be a very good reason I would like to know about.

Joke aside, to have Oprah in the small selected close family and friends group when she only met her once or twice, was in hindsight a sign of the things to come. Including this interview!

Malteser71 · 08/03/2021 00:41

This whole sorry mess highlights that Americans don’t understand British culture.

And why would they? It very subtle.

But there are things we just don’t do, or rather, things that are considered distasteful or phoney.

Like, for example, inviting a famous person to your wedding when you barely know them, then basically seating them with your family, where everyone can see them.

Or indeed, accepting an invitation to the same wedding when you don’t know the bride ad groom, then sitting in prime position. It’s quite baffling that anyone would do that.

Meghan seems surprised that she wasn’t free to speak to Oprah on the phone. Of course she wasn’t. It’s not how the Royajs operate. She seems to have woefully misunderstood tradition, or the role she married into.

It’s like being desperate to be a doctor without understanding what it entails, then complaining later when you have to deal with patients.

I have always felt that H and M rushed into marriage due to her age. If they’d met at 25, she’d have had longer to get to know what she was getting herself into, and doubtless she’d have run a mile. Previous girlfriends did - they understood what they’d be getting themselves into.

I feel sorry for them both in different ways. I think Meghan thought she could fundamentally change this age old monarchy, but I’m not sure why she thought we wanted her to?

It’s a successful monarchy precisely because it carries tradition and history. She could have been such a positive role model, it’s a shame. Some of their behaviour has been pretty poor, albeit much of it seemed quite reactive.

Coronateachingagain · 08/03/2021 00:41

@Thewithesarehere

Seriously? Herein lies the difference. Even if you had the faintest point..... which don't think applies, but even if you did, I would not invite the Queen to my wedding even if she hinted she wanted to come. Why would you. And I am a supporter. But maybe it is a British thing.

To be fair, if you are a supporter, I don’t think you would have turned down if you had the option to invite the Queen. I think you are lying actually and there are LOADS of Britishers who would disagree with you, including me.
However, it’s quite obvious that the Queen and Oprah are two entirely different women. However much you like the Queen, I am sure it can’t come close to what Oprah has gained in one life time. So there is no comparison at all anyway. 🤷🏻‍♀️

Britisher??? Where in GB are you actually from?! Some place called New something's looks more probable.