I think there are loaded statements and assumptions on this thread, that pp have pointed out.
What would suit one 44 year old, wouldn’t necessarily suit another. So it’s a bit pointless asking what others would do, as their decisions would be based on their circumstances- and as we know, no two set is circumstances are the same
Is 44 young to have a child? Well no, but neither is it in the same realm of say a 65 year declaring they’re expecting.
Considering the average age of death is early 80’s, it’s likely the ‘child’ would be in its 40’s by the time the child would lose their parent. That’s hardly a reason to opt of out having a child at 44.
Also, many 44 year olds will be fitter than 30 year olds. If they have a bmi in the ideal range and they feel they can cope, who’s business is it to say they can’t?
Also, financially they are likely to be more secure than a mother in their 20’s. Financial security is a big consideration.
So all in all, it’s no ones business to decide if a 44 year old should have a baby. Clearly nature says it’s fine.....