@Tootletum I agree.
I saw a doctor tweeting about how bad things are this weekend (as they are most winters I have no doubt, likely worse this year but how much worse?) “health is wealth”. It’s such an emotive statement and of course you don’t want to be the heartless one to put a price on someone’s life...
But honestly are we now at the point where ANY cost is justified in keeping deaths a little bit down? I say a little bit because viruses spread, it’s what they do, so the death rate is largely out of our control... Is it worth devastating the economy for a generation? Losing thousands or even millions their life savings, their mental health, their jobs, their businesses, their homes?
We could get rid of road deaths overnight by banning cars but clearly we have decided that cars are too useful and the deaths they cause are worth it. There is an implied cost-benefit there ...
Logically there needs to be a maximum price we, as a society, are willing to pay to slightly reduce the spread of CV with its horrific mortality rate of around 0.02% or whatever it is. Maybe it is a high number but there does need to be a limit and as a society we should be talking about it.
Re the point about people driving home on Christmas Day drunk or tired and more likely to have an accident... I mean, it’s as nonsensical as the 10pm curfew or the substantial meal rubbish isn’t it? The virus sleeps on Christmas Day don’t you know, but watch out on Boxing Day.
Surely it would make more sense for the government to say you are permitted one VISIT? - that visit could be an hour, it could be two days.. but for that period you are one household. I can see they don’t want people popping in and out of each other’s houses but if you’re already with someone all day what is the possible issue with spending a night?