"there have been some bitchy comments on this thread, are we jealous, plain nasty or having a shit day so let's take it out on someone who is happy and wouldn't give a shit what randoms think anyway"
I get the feeling that some people think that the York sisters ought to carry the weight of shame and responsibility in lieu of their father, publically, because he's blatantly not. Which is daft. The first part, obviously, not the second. But "the sins of the father" are not, and should never be "the sins of the child(ren)", too. Both of those young women have held down actual jobs in the real world, carried out public engagements on the Queen's behalf, behaved decently/kindly, had long-term relationships, and absolutely cannot help who their parents are. Their father, on the other hand... yeah; not so much.
Bea looked radiant, obviously felt beautiful in that gorgeous dress, and made the best out of a bad job, concerning how many times her wedding was postponed, and how the family all know the public would react to seeing her with her father on her wedding day (which, again, wrong, not her fault so why should she be punished?). The Queen and Prince Philip, as another poster said, look like the proud, loving grandparents they are - albeit at a socially distanced spot. The fact that Bea was permitted to "borrow" the Queen's own wedding tiara? Speaks volumes about their actual, behind-the-scenes relationship. As does not releasing the public images so as not to diminish from Sir Tom Moore's knighting, about Bea's own persona.
Personally, I think the wedding was hastily arranged, as the Queen doesn't tend to double-book herself - particularly not on a grandchild's wedding day! But that's my personal opinion (and I might be wrong), not me being "gossipy".