I looked and commented last night and, having read some of the other comments but not returned to the listing, (as in real life I wouldn't, unless I was quite interested), a few comments:
- There's a paddock? I had no idea. (I like pictures and love floorplans. I'd only wade through the description if those things had already sold it to me).
- I saw the garage in the pictures. Didn't know its size. Its roof line matches the house nicely, adding to the visual appeal of the front aspect.
- Conversely, I'm afraid that back extension may be an example of why the sort of 'quantity over quality' approach to maximising bedroom numbers, that might work in a small city-centre flat, does not sell an otherwise attractive, large, rural property, where people will be looking for style and substance. It sounds as though that bedroom hasn't even been counted, which makes me think there's a building regs problem with describing it as one (though it's not obvious what that would be).
- The 'annexe potential' thing is a poor description. On reflection, I understand it to mean that the existing extension could be re-jigged to convert it into a self-contained annexe, with the addition of a proper bathroom and a kitchenette. In which case it needs to say 'extension with self-cointained annexe potential'.
- Its not anyone thinks the bathroom tiles are grubby, it's that cream tiles look grubby. Which is why people use bright, clinical white in bathrooms. That photo angle is awful, highlighting an unattractive cupboard door (beneath sink) and the bottom of an ugly cupboard (boiler?), top right.
- You're sailing against current fashion, with your shades of cream and brown. I'm not a fan of the current / recent fashion for grey (which, as far as I'm concerned, is about decorating your entire house for the sake of a photographic trick, 'stick something colourful in front of it and it looks like an 'artful' black and white photo with one thing coloured in, whoohoo!'). What you do need to know though, is that cream and magnolia are very 'out' and have been for years, so they make it look very dated, so giving an immediate impression of 'needs work throughout'.
If you can be bothered, I think it would be worth re-decorating one reception room, or a wall at least. I wouldn't touch the dining room, as it looks small already, darker colours will add to that. Ok, looking at the photos again:
Living room (with TV, bookshelves, fireplace): Remove clutter in front of fireplace, swap curtains for plain, or remove. For a quick 'fashion fix', add a 'feature chair' in mustard, teal or pink. Your walls here look greyish, so that would give a sense of currentness and provide a visual focal point. Won't quite go with your sofa covers though.
Dining room: remove curtains and coloured ornaments for pictures.
Reception with wood stove: that wall with the curved bookshelf and maybe around the stove is the one to paint. Try a bright, dark blue, or a lichen green. Look at furniture and kitchen catalogues to get an idea of what's fashionable and looks good. Change or remove rug.
The rest is ok, it conveys 'space' well, it's not cluttered.
I like your Ercol furniture, especially in the dining room. It does convey a deliberate mid-century style - which isn't carried through with wall colours etc. I'm not keen on the cushion covers, which do look a bit 'conservatory furniture' to my eye.
Sorry to be blunt but, this is what you came here for 