Meet the Other Phone. Only the apps you allow.

Meet the Other Phone.
Only the apps you allow.

Buy now

Please or to access all these features

Chat

Join the discussion and chat with other Mumsnetters about everyday life, relationships and parenting.

See all MNHQ comments on this thread

Cost of making eastenders..

194 replies

Whisky2014 · 01/06/2019 23:11

I just wondered how much it costs to make Eastenders and after just clicking a few articles on this I have found it to be about £140k per episode...£30 million a year.

Not only that, but the BBC had a £60 Million budget to upgrade the set and they have managed to go £27 million over this bringing it to £87 million and to be completed by 2023, 5 years late.
"MPs heard the set, built in 1984, is “no longer fit for purpose” and the rebuild is “crucial to the future success of EastEnders"

Well, sorry but it's absolute brain rot and if rather it didn't have a future! I'd much rather they made some good quality series. If they put their mind to it, the BBC can make some really good stuff. Why do they insist on shoving this crap down people's throats? Viewing numbers have been decreasing, I assume because of the younger generations being more inclined to watch stuff on Amazon and Netflix etc, so this revamp seems like even more of a waste. Confused

OP posts:
Whisky2014 · 03/06/2019 12:49

LarryGreysonsDoor what was the problem?

OP posts:
LarryGreysonsDoor · 03/06/2019 12:49

The problem is that you don’t like EE.

Whisky2014 · 03/06/2019 12:53

No, that's not a problem.

OP posts:

Interested in this thread?

Then you might like threads about this subject:

Awwlookatmybabyspider · 03/06/2019 12:53

"Its ran since the 80s. I just think its time for a change"

Well no one is forcing you to watch it.
Also Corrie's been running since 1960. Emmerdale since 1972. Do you want them taken off air as well.

Whisky2014 · 03/06/2019 12:56

Yep, definitely

OP posts:
VanGoghsDog · 03/06/2019 13:01

I'd just prefer the money that's given to the BBC by license payers to go on a higher quality program

How very snobby.

I like Eastenders, don't see why I should only be able to watch what you choose.

Whisky2014 · 03/06/2019 13:03

Well, that's not what's happening is it?

It's a bit strange you're allowed to say you like it but I can't say I don't. Hmm

OP posts:
Whisky2014 · 03/06/2019 13:03

Maybe you'd like what they make in replacement of it even more! Fear of the unknown maybe

OP posts:
PCohle · 03/06/2019 13:05

You're perfectly welcome to say you don't like Eastenders. Posters have a problem with you saying "I don't like it therefore it should be taken off the air and replaced with a programme of my choosing".

gamerchick · 03/06/2019 13:05

You are allowed to say you don't. It's the wanting it took off completely people are objecting to. You don't like it but there are a lot of people who do.

Just dont watch it. It is literally a 1+1 thing.

joyfullittlehippo · 03/06/2019 13:07

This reply has been deleted

Message withdrawn at poster's request.

joyfullittlehippo · 03/06/2019 13:08

This reply has been deleted

Message withdrawn at poster's request.

Whisky2014 · 03/06/2019 13:10

joyfullittlehippo you can't tell me that if we didn't pay t.v. licence that we wouldn't have broadband. That's just the most ridiculous thing ever.

gamerchick yeh I get that. I don't watch it. But I was surprised at the £80 million revamp which I personally think surely must be able to go towards something better.

Ah well.

OP posts:
Whisky2014 · 03/06/2019 13:13

joyfullittlehippo I don't know what's LOL about that? I'd say if you ask the majority of people they'd say you had to have a licence. And actually since there was no streaming available can you tell me how there was an option to not pay? The only way is see is of you watched solely video tapes and didn't have the aerial plugged in, or not tv at all otherwise you DID have to pay...

OP posts:
Whisky2014 · 03/06/2019 13:16

joyfullittlehippo so you, yourself admit to not watching soaps and wouldn't choose to. The only reason you do is because you got a job writing for it. Wow. That's sad.

OP posts:
joyfullittlehippo · 03/06/2019 13:17

This reply has been deleted

Message withdrawn at poster's request.

joyfullittlehippo · 03/06/2019 13:23

This reply has been deleted

Message withdrawn at poster's request.

Whisky2014 · 03/06/2019 13:24

Frankly, if the BBC is responsible for implementing it, that's why it's not UK wide and why are are behind any other country that has implemented it properly.
Private company would have done it by now. Tv licence could also have just been rolled up into thr tax we pay. Seems silly to have it as a separate fee, they'd probably do better out of it actually.

OP posts:
Whisky2014 · 03/06/2019 13:28

This reply has been deleted

Message deleted by MNHQ. Here's a link to our Talk Guidelines.

joyfullittlehippo · 03/06/2019 13:29

This reply has been deleted

Message withdrawn at poster's request.

Whisky2014 · 03/06/2019 13:31

I do read. Lots :)

OP posts:
Whisky2014 · 03/06/2019 13:32

OK I'm at an owl centre now so got to go. I'll leave you to your pit of misery

OP posts:
joyfullittlehippo · 03/06/2019 13:43

This reply has been deleted

Message withdrawn at poster's request.

Graphista · 03/06/2019 19:36

Thanks myotherprofile, basinhaircut,

Re shatnerswig post - op caught!! Friends (which I adore) is hardly highbrow! And yes bloody expensive to make - though again I suspect they more than made the money back.

"The BBC is irrelevant" don't be ridiculous! It's informative, has a wide variety of programmes and is a key part of British culture.

"and we shouldn’t have to pay the nasty stealth tax that is the tv license" it's not compulsory, if you CHOOSE to watch live tv then yes you need to have a licence but nobody is forcing you, it's easier than ever to opt out. FYI the licence fee doesn't only cover BBC tv programming either. There's all the radio provision, an excellent website plus some licence fee money goes towards programming on non BBC channels that are in the public interest.

"They should go commercial or subscription, so people have the choice." you DO have a choice.

Commercial channels/programming most definitely does fall to "lowest common denominator" in many cases in order to ensure advertising revenue, there is programming on the BBC that would NEVER occur on other channels.

"Ah but until very recently there was no choice, was there? It was pay the licence and tough if you don't like what's on." Given we've had video since the 80's, while its easier & cheaper now with streaming & catch up services I know a good few people who have never even owned a tv or have chosen not to watch live tv and therefore not had a licence for many years - most of them are scots as part of my family are brethren and so don't have a tv or radio on religious grounds.

If you are indeed in NE Scotland I'm surprised if you're not already aware of this.

Watching tv even listening to radio is not compulsory, there are plenty of other things people can do to entertain/inform themselves.

"What they should do is actively block access for anyone who hasn't paid." I agree with this. Daft to just be able to click "I have a tv licence" on iplayer, no reason why licence holders can't log in using their licence number.

"And even when streaming became a thing, BBC were still cagey about whether you needed a licence or not" no it was always clear if people bothered to check the terms and conditions.

"Calling all of them "thick" is rude and narrow minded" totally agree!

"but I can't say I don't" absolutely NOBODY has said that! What we've said is you don't have the right just because YOU don't like it to say it should be cancelled!

Joyfullittlehippo excellent post at 1307

"The only way is see is of you watched solely video tapes and didn't have the aerial plugged in" yep! I know people who've done this.

The more you post op the more rude, aggressive and ignorant you sound!

Whisky2014 · 03/06/2019 19:39

This reply has been deleted

Message deleted by MNHQ. Here's a link to our Talk Guidelines.

Swipe left for the next trending thread