@JazKish
It is very common for victims to share the same law firm. Usually a law firm that specialises in abuse cases. Just as there are law firms that specialise in accident and injury compensation. Law firms that specialise in workplace compensation (ie class action against asbestos companies). Law firms that specialise in tort. I could go on and on and on. Having one law firm for many victims is standard procedure.
Two, again, it is not about money. It is about the abuse being recognised. Money is only a tiny part of it, and it is called COMPENSATION. Which any victim of abuse is entitled to. The claims didn't progress in court due to a thing called the Statute of Limitations. Maybe do some research on it. And putting in a claim for compensation doesn't in any way mean they are lying. On the contrary. As I said, as victims, they would have been entitled to claim compensation. It is only fair and just. Regardless, now, they never received a cent for doing the documentary. So your claim is irrevelant.
I have clearly done far more research than you, and I know all that about the law enforcement investigations. Whats your point? You copy/pasted text there that really doesn't add anything to your post.
Those books, especially the boys book, are from NAMBLA. It was written by a member of NAMBLA. If you actually did your research, which is 100% clear you haven't done ANY research, you'd know this.
I am 100% sure he is guilt, because he has been accused before - very very few rich celebrities are accused, I mean, Bill Gates has had no accusations against him. There is no smoke without fire. The boys testimony. What they found at the ranch, including boys stained underwear hidden in a closet, NAMBLA books, naked pictures of boys, his OBSESSION with boys and never having GIRLS to stay over (which if he truly loved children - PLURAL, that includes girls, he would have had 50/50 staying over) and paedophiles almost always prefer one gender over another, just as adults in relationships do, the clear and convincing testimony of the men in the documentary etc you'd have to be lying to yourself and others or in deep deep denial to see he is as obviously a paedophile as the Pope is Catholic.
You said elsewhere he is "100% innocent". May I ask you if you where there with Jackson?