So men own their surnames but women only ever borrow them? Bollocks.
My point exactly but thanks for the insult, so having my father's, father's father's etc name was no different to have my husband's father's, father's etc name. However you cut it, I'd be using a male's surname that had been passed down through time. Never a family name passed down by women, only men. Why should I care which one I use? 
The only way to break the chain would be to invent a new surname just for us and our children. It's just a name, it doesn't define me any more than my 'maiden' name did it also doesn't allude to my mother's family at all.
Like I said, omitting mothers from the wedding register is far worse than women who choose to take their husband's name. It is literally deleting them from history.
Get off your keyboard and go overhaul the wedding registration rules and make it standard that upon leaving a wedding ceremony the marriage certificate is sufficient for either/both persons to legally change their known identity and it'll go further in addressing the perceived imbalance than spouting hate at women who are happy using their husband's surname.
I've raised it as a point of concern with my MP who agrees and is supporting motions to get this addressed. Maybe if more keyboard warriors happy to talk down to other women on a forum did the same there'd be more change happening rather than just insulting us poor deluded women who can't even stick to their father's surname!