Meet the Other Phone. A phone that grows with your child.

Meet the Other Phone.
A phone that grows with your child.

Buy now

Please or to access all these features

AMA

I'm an educational psychologist AMA

210 replies

thisisasurvivor · 31/07/2024 22:30

Hello all

LA EP here

Ask me anything

OP posts:
Thread gallery
5
AlienOnEarth · 24/06/2025 12:02

To what kind of school would you send two primary school aged children with IQs well into the top 1%, gifted and talented, but who are autistic and cannot cope with a mainstream school environment with so many children in a class and all the noise? They need SALT which they are not receiving, they need TA support and a much calmer environment (so somewhere without disruptive children), and somewhere with good pastoral support, staff trained in autism properly who understand masking (terrible in mainstream), a different way of learning with far more visual learning and downtime during the day, a lower volume but higher quality of work and and extended and enriched curriculum.

The mainstream school system is destroying their mental health and both are at risk of complete school refusal. Their anxiety is awful now and their self-esteem has been trashed. And they’re barely learning anything, meeting the academic targets even though one missed over a term last year.

All special schools in our area that could cater for their autism better with more support and smaller classes are not sufficiently academic even if I could get them a place, and also contain many loud, unpredictable and disruptive children with behavioural issues.

They are currently being discriminated against doubly because school staff use their autism and anxiety as an excuse not to give them challenging work (when they literally cannot focus on things they find easy and underperform on such boring tasks but perform at the level of 17 or 18 year olds on harder tasks per their EP reports) AND the school staff minimise their support needs because they are intelligent and not disruptive and can meet the baseline targets for children with half of their IQ without even attending.

They are being absolutely failed in every way but I don’t know what kind of schools exist for children like them? Their so-called case officer at the Local Authority has refused to even speak to me or their advocate throughout their EHCP assessments: won’t reply to emails or voicemails or arrange a meeting. Their LA is obstructing everything as much as possible so any insight from you as to what schools are designed for such children would be very welcome.

AlienOnEarth · 24/06/2025 12:06

Both are extremely bright but have issues with processing speed, working memory, executive function, SALT needs, and now - thanks to school - terrible mental health and believe themselves to be stupid.

I’d be very grateful to know what kind of school you would send such children to, if they were your own children.

Boucle · 24/06/2025 13:18

Perzival · 24/06/2025 11:01

I asked this at the time and they said it was because his results ranged from 0.1 to 9th percentile so had too much of a gap. Thank you for replying.

I agree with @DrRuthGalloway

BrumToTheRescue · 24/06/2025 13:21

@AlienOnEarth would an independent MS work? Or would it still be too overwhelming?

There are some SS who can cater to academically able DC. Although sometimes the peer group is limited for those DC who are very academically able. If there aren’t within travelling distance of you, would boarding work for your DC?

If it is inappropriate for provision to be made in a school, you could look at EOTAS/EOTIS.

DrRuthGalloway · 24/06/2025 15:35

Perzival · 24/06/2025 11:01

I asked this at the time and they said it was because his results ranged from 0.1 to 9th percentile so had too much of a gap. Thank you for replying.

That was the technical advice for WISC 4 but in WISC 5 they recommended reporting FSIQ in any case as it continues to have validity (especially when all scores are skewed in the same direction like these are) , but clarifying it's not the full picture, and then talking in more detail about relative strengths and weaknesses.

PocketSand · 24/06/2025 15:46

Sorry. I have never seen a quantified and specified LA EP report. We got copies of the full report. Are you saying the LA intervened and made you take out quantification and specification?

Perzival · 24/06/2025 15:51

DrRuthGalloway · 24/06/2025 15:35

That was the technical advice for WISC 4 but in WISC 5 they recommended reporting FSIQ in any case as it continues to have validity (especially when all scores are skewed in the same direction like these are) , but clarifying it's not the full picture, and then talking in more detail about relative strengths and weaknesses.

Thank you. I've chased it with the paediatrician to refer to see if we can get away with not paying for an inde one.

May I ask please do they categorise as pmld, severe and moderate. I'm guessing he would fall into severe, is that right please? I'm justtrying to prepare myself. Although I know he has significant needs it doesn't stop the feelings when I read reports etc.

Edit to add: the report did talk about strengths and weaknesses and was a great tribunal report. We did get a fully specified and quantified ehcp and the provision we wanted.

PocketSand · 24/06/2025 15:52

@alienI had bespoke package with therapy, tutors and internet school. DS2 then went to brick 6th form for maths, FM maths and physics and now doing an engineering degree. Mental health is key.

DrRuthGalloway · 24/06/2025 16:37

Perzival · 24/06/2025 15:51

Thank you. I've chased it with the paediatrician to refer to see if we can get away with not paying for an inde one.

May I ask please do they categorise as pmld, severe and moderate. I'm guessing he would fall into severe, is that right please? I'm justtrying to prepare myself. Although I know he has significant needs it doesn't stop the feelings when I read reports etc.

Edit to add: the report did talk about strengths and weaknesses and was a great tribunal report. We did get a fully specified and quantified ehcp and the provision we wanted.

Edited

EPs are discouraged from giving levels of learning difficulties nowadays but in my day we were trained that FSIQ >50<70 is moderate learning difficulties (learning difficulties being the educational terminology in the SEND code of practice) and <50 severe. PMLD is usually youngsters with multiple other needs such as hearing or visual impairment, unable to walk independently, needing positioning etc as well as learning needs.

This is different from "learning disability" which is a medical term. In medical terms FSIQ <70 is a mild learning disability and iirc <50 is moderate learning disability.

Perzival · 24/06/2025 17:00

DrRuthGalloway · 24/06/2025 16:37

EPs are discouraged from giving levels of learning difficulties nowadays but in my day we were trained that FSIQ >50<70 is moderate learning difficulties (learning difficulties being the educational terminology in the SEND code of practice) and <50 severe. PMLD is usually youngsters with multiple other needs such as hearing or visual impairment, unable to walk independently, needing positioning etc as well as learning needs.

This is different from "learning disability" which is a medical term. In medical terms FSIQ <70 is a mild learning disability and iirc <50 is moderate learning disability.

Thank you

AlienOnEarth · 24/06/2025 17:55

BrumToTheRescue · 24/06/2025 13:21

@AlienOnEarth would an independent MS work? Or would it still be too overwhelming?

There are some SS who can cater to academically able DC. Although sometimes the peer group is limited for those DC who are very academically able. If there aren’t within travelling distance of you, would boarding work for your DC?

If it is inappropriate for provision to be made in a school, you could look at EOTAS/EOTIS.

Thank you. Boarding definitely not. Do you have any examplew of academic SSs that I can look up, that have a calm environment, are not for kids with disruptive behaviours etc but have the small classes and higher pastoral support?

A small, academic mainstream private school with good pastoral care would probably be ideal, where they kick out disruptive kids. But between me being a lone parent, working full time and having to pay nannies for wrap around and all holidays when I’m working as they can’t do after school clubs/ holiday clubs on top of school, I can’t fund this as well (even with a bursary). The amount I pay for nannies would probably just about cover the fees but then I’d have nobody to care for them in school holidays.

I believe I can fight the LA to pay for private mainstream if no state mainstream or SS are appropriate but assume they’d fight this tooth and nail? And how can I prove no SS or mainstream can meet their needs?

I can’t really go for EOTAS unless it actually was a proper schedule of full time provision because I have to work to pay the mortgage, childcare, all of their medical care as well because of the failing NHS.

The whole thing is an appalling mess of illegal behaviour and nobody seems to care about the children involved. The LA refuse to even speak to me or the children’s advocate to discuss any of it so I don’t know what to do.

Advice would be very welcome. We are in Sussex.

AlienOnEarth · 24/06/2025 17:56

PocketSand · 24/06/2025 15:52

@alienI had bespoke package with therapy, tutors and internet school. DS2 then went to brick 6th form for maths, FM maths and physics and now doing an engineering degree. Mental health is key.

That’s fantastic. Was it genuinely full time provision, not an expectation that you’d do half of it? I would love to but it’s simply not feasible unless I clone myself.

BrumToTheRescue · 24/06/2025 18:57

@AlienOnEarth where are you in the EHCP process? Do you currently have the right of appeal?

If DC already have EHCPs, is the provision detailed, specified and quantified in F being provided? If not, have you contacted the Director of Children’s Services and gone down the pre-action letter route if that didn’t work?

Independent schools can be named in EHCPs. If an independent school is named in section I, the LA is responsible for funding special educational provision and the fees. For wholly independent schools, you need to prove the LA’s proposed school(s) can’t meet needs &/or it isn’t unreasonable public expenditure. You prove the LA’s proposed school(s) can’t meet needs via evidence. You can look at independent assessments - e.g. EP, OT, SALT. If you need independent assessments and you aren’t eligible for legal aid, there are charities (e.g. Parents in Need) that can help fund assessments. Although many have to appeal.

EOTAS/EOTIS is not EHE. You are not responsible for the provision. The law is very clear on this. You cannot be compelled to deliver, facilitate or organise provision. That is the LA’s responsibility. You can’t even be forced into accepting provision at home. And you do not need to be present as a second adult. Where a second adult is required, the LA is responsible. You can still work and it can be full time. I have 2 DSs with comprehensive full time EOTAS/EOTIS packages. Again, many have to appeal to secure a comprehensive package.

Where you live, you will struggle for SS who could cater to the profile DC’s have.

Depending on where in West Sussex you are, if either DC is an older primary boy, More House may be just about doable. They sometimes admit even if the boys don’t have dyslexia, etc. They can cater to more academic boys, e.g. offer a range of A levels and send boys to university (I know your DC are primary age, just highlighting what they can offer), although your DC would still be at the top of their cohort.

DC will probably find it too overwhelming and they won’t have an exact peer group academically for DC, but you might decide to look at Northease Manor if it would be just about doable from where in West Sussex you are.

Also, if either DC is an older primary boy, you could look at Slindon College. Technically, not a specialist school. In practice, it isn’t a mainstream. Although depending on their needs, they might find it overwhelming.

Lots find Great Ballard School nurturing. Worth looking at if you think DC could manage a mainstream independent.

Separate to the EHCP process, if DC are compulsory school age and unable to attend school full time, have you requested the LA provide alternative provision as per their duty under section 19 of the Education Act 1996? If you haven’t, do that. IPSEA has a model letter you can send to the Director of Children’s Services. If you haven’t but WSCC has refused, ignored you or is delaying, email again threatening judicial review. If that doesn’t work, you need a pre-action letter. SOSSEN can help with this free of charge, but there is a wait, so you may want to look elsewhere. Then, if that fails, JR proceedings will work.

Apologies for the long post.

Burnshersmurfs · 24/06/2025 19:19

thisisasurvivor · 31/07/2024 22:47

I would apply any way

They may just say yes come in for interview and if successful it will depend on you completing conversion course

speaking also as an EP, this is categorically not the case. You must have completed your qualifying course before application.

DrRuthGalloway · 24/06/2025 20:05

AlienOnEarth · 24/06/2025 17:55

Thank you. Boarding definitely not. Do you have any examplew of academic SSs that I can look up, that have a calm environment, are not for kids with disruptive behaviours etc but have the small classes and higher pastoral support?

A small, academic mainstream private school with good pastoral care would probably be ideal, where they kick out disruptive kids. But between me being a lone parent, working full time and having to pay nannies for wrap around and all holidays when I’m working as they can’t do after school clubs/ holiday clubs on top of school, I can’t fund this as well (even with a bursary). The amount I pay for nannies would probably just about cover the fees but then I’d have nobody to care for them in school holidays.

I believe I can fight the LA to pay for private mainstream if no state mainstream or SS are appropriate but assume they’d fight this tooth and nail? And how can I prove no SS or mainstream can meet their needs?

I can’t really go for EOTAS unless it actually was a proper schedule of full time provision because I have to work to pay the mortgage, childcare, all of their medical care as well because of the failing NHS.

The whole thing is an appalling mess of illegal behaviour and nobody seems to care about the children involved. The LA refuse to even speak to me or the children’s advocate to discuss any of it so I don’t know what to do.

Advice would be very welcome. We are in Sussex.

Don't you have resourced units or provisions in any of your mainstream schools? These are often able to reduce the overwhelm in terms of people and sensory overload and provide a small peer group and close relationships with staff and they can be very successful for some able autistic youngsters (as long as there isn't a constant push to be in every mainstream lesson).

BrumToTheRescue · 24/06/2025 20:12

For lots with the profile @AlienOnEarth describes, special support centres as they are called in WSCC don’t work because ultimately they are still part of the overwhelming mainstream school and they often don’t have a peer group within the unit.

DrRuthGalloway · 24/06/2025 22:02

BrumToTheRescue · 24/06/2025 20:12

For lots with the profile @AlienOnEarth describes, special support centres as they are called in WSCC don’t work because ultimately they are still part of the overwhelming mainstream school and they often don’t have a peer group within the unit.

Of course they don't work for everyone. But it's worth going to see if alien hasn't already done so, if only to have a more informed opinion on why they would not be suitable.

Fwiw they do work for some kids like alien's as well. It entirely depends on the skill of the staff, the flexibility around altering the offer, the expectations to attend mainstream, and the peer group.

BrumToTheRescue · 24/06/2025 22:21

I didn’t say they didn’t work for anyone or not to look at them.

DrRuthGalloway · 24/06/2025 22:41

BrumToTheRescue · 24/06/2025 22:21

I didn’t say they didn’t work for anyone or not to look at them.

Lol, and I didn't say they did work for everyone or would be the surefire solution.

It felt a little like you were explaining to me that RPs don't always work for every able autistic student and why, like I wouldn't already know that! If that wasn't your intention then I apologize.

BrumToTheRescue · 24/06/2025 22:48

@DrRuthGalloway I was making a general observation. My post wasn’t necessarily aimed at you, hence I didn’t quote or tag you. I was posting more generally about the other poster’s situation. You may know why SSCs don’t work for lots, others, including the other poster, may not. And even if they do, it is a discussion forum. I didn’t say you said they worked for everyone or that they would be a surefire solution. My post wasn’t a criticism of you personally or saying your post was wrong.

AlienOnEarth · 25/06/2025 14:16

BrumToTheRescue · 24/06/2025 18:57

@AlienOnEarth where are you in the EHCP process? Do you currently have the right of appeal?

If DC already have EHCPs, is the provision detailed, specified and quantified in F being provided? If not, have you contacted the Director of Children’s Services and gone down the pre-action letter route if that didn’t work?

Independent schools can be named in EHCPs. If an independent school is named in section I, the LA is responsible for funding special educational provision and the fees. For wholly independent schools, you need to prove the LA’s proposed school(s) can’t meet needs &/or it isn’t unreasonable public expenditure. You prove the LA’s proposed school(s) can’t meet needs via evidence. You can look at independent assessments - e.g. EP, OT, SALT. If you need independent assessments and you aren’t eligible for legal aid, there are charities (e.g. Parents in Need) that can help fund assessments. Although many have to appeal.

EOTAS/EOTIS is not EHE. You are not responsible for the provision. The law is very clear on this. You cannot be compelled to deliver, facilitate or organise provision. That is the LA’s responsibility. You can’t even be forced into accepting provision at home. And you do not need to be present as a second adult. Where a second adult is required, the LA is responsible. You can still work and it can be full time. I have 2 DSs with comprehensive full time EOTAS/EOTIS packages. Again, many have to appeal to secure a comprehensive package.

Where you live, you will struggle for SS who could cater to the profile DC’s have.

Depending on where in West Sussex you are, if either DC is an older primary boy, More House may be just about doable. They sometimes admit even if the boys don’t have dyslexia, etc. They can cater to more academic boys, e.g. offer a range of A levels and send boys to university (I know your DC are primary age, just highlighting what they can offer), although your DC would still be at the top of their cohort.

DC will probably find it too overwhelming and they won’t have an exact peer group academically for DC, but you might decide to look at Northease Manor if it would be just about doable from where in West Sussex you are.

Also, if either DC is an older primary boy, you could look at Slindon College. Technically, not a specialist school. In practice, it isn’t a mainstream. Although depending on their needs, they might find it overwhelming.

Lots find Great Ballard School nurturing. Worth looking at if you think DC could manage a mainstream independent.

Separate to the EHCP process, if DC are compulsory school age and unable to attend school full time, have you requested the LA provide alternative provision as per their duty under section 19 of the Education Act 1996? If you haven’t, do that. IPSEA has a model letter you can send to the Director of Children’s Services. If you haven’t but WSCC has refused, ignored you or is delaying, email again threatening judicial review. If that doesn’t work, you need a pre-action letter. SOSSEN can help with this free of charge, but there is a wait, so you may want to look elsewhere. Then, if that fails, JR proceedings will work.

Apologies for the long post.

Please don’t apologise, I’m very grateful for your detailed reply and suggestions.

My older child (a boy, YR3) had the LA refuse to assess. They were forced to do so in December. They have recently, very belatedly, decided not to issue an EHCP for him despite detailed reports from two neurdevelopmental paediatricians, OT, two EPs (the LA one and a very thorough report from a private one), a thorough SALT report of almost 50 pages (again private, because the NHS SALT service refused even to assess him after two years on their waiting list because he can speak in sentences. They sent us around the houses claiming it wasn’t their remit and they only treat children who are non-verbal or can’t form a full sentence but his GP and I contacted the ICB and they stated the NHS SALT service is the correct commissioned service to see him so this is now also the subject of a formal complaint). He has reports from his ENT consultant (hearing issues), and his child psychologist who he sees weekly.

Via an SAR, because their refusal to issue with all of this evidence was inexplicable, I obtained documents which prove they ignored all of these reports and claimed there was no input. His “case officer” has refused to speak to me or my children’s advocate or SENDIAS at any point during the assessment process.

I’ve now lodged a tribunal case to get this decision overturned and been advised that the hearing won’t be until next spring. I am hoping - given the overwhelming amount of evidence - that it can be done as a paper hearing so perhaps this decision can be overturned sooner as it’s so obvious that they are deliberately obstructing much needed provision that all of his doctors and specialists have set out that he needs.

My concern is that they are trying to delay this as long as possible deliberately so that we’re not in a position at the start of YR5 to start looking for an appropriate secondary place for him, with an EHCP in place (just over a year away). No doubt even when they’re forced to issue, they won’t draft it properly with the provision his doctors and specialists have said he needs and I’ll have to take them to tribunal a third time to get an appropriate EHCP in place, when the search for appropriate secondary places should be starting. It would be catastrophic for him, with his particular issues, if he doesn’t have a clear plan in place in YR6 for where he is going and isn’t able to start at the start of YR7 along with his cohort, in an appropriate school. Mainstream secondary absolutely will not be an option. These “units” are totally inappropriate because again that is a choice between EITHER being in class learning OR having an appropriate environment for your autism, so missing much learning and unable to learn in the environment when he is in class because of the teaching methods and too many people. It’s simply not appropriate, especially with different children and different teachers in different classrooms all day, the disruption and noise caused by many pupils in these secondary schools, the total lack of enforcement of the rules. He needs a quiet, calm, academic environment in a small school with class sizes of 15 maximum and appropriate, calm behaviour from others throughout the school so he can just focus on learning.

I think perhaps the only place this exists is in small, private mainstream schools where disruptive behaviour or bullying wouldn’t be tolerated, and the learning is much faster, the teachers and other pupils well-known, proper behaviour management, and a far faster pace of learning.

Do I try to make these points at the upcoming tribunal about issuing his EHCP in the first place, or do I have to do this tribunal (already the second one) just to get them to issue the EHCP, then a third to get them to draft it properly, then another one to try to get them to allocate him an appropriate secondary school, so four in total?

He was diagnosed with autism in Reception. How can it be that it’s this hard even to get an EHCP in place in time for SECONDARY school, despite reports from all of these different doctors and specialists all explicitly stating that he needs one?

I genuinely don’t know how these LA staff sleep at night, they are disgraceful excuses for human beings. The damage they have done will take us YEARS to repair, if we can at all, and primary school has been a write off: he’s learned what he could in 6 months in 4 years and his mental health has been trashed. I just need to know what to do now to stop them doing any more damage.

We live in mid-Sussex, near Haywards Heath. He would never cope with boarding or being away overnight, he’s extremely reliant on me. It would have to be somewhere commutable. There are some small independent private schools around us but I have no idea how to approach this with them. We receive no advice from the LA. I am autistic myself so I’m finding all of this, navigating it on top of the LA’s obstruction and gaslighting and refusal even to discuss the situation extremely difficult to cope with on top of being a lone parent and full time work to pay our mortgage, for the nannies they need outside school, for most of their medical treatment etc, so any advice would be very welcome. Ultimately in any school where he’s in classes of 30 or expected to deal with unpredictable behaviour or people or teachers he doesn’t know well or lots of noise, he will not cope. Yet he’s capable of understanding quite complex maths and physics already, IF someone sits with him and explains it visually to him rather than standing at the front of class speaking “at” him. He is also extremely kind and empathetic and sociable, but needs this to be in an environment with kind children like him who aren’t randomly violent or cruel. And not in a school - like most mainstream schools - where this is routinely allowed to go on all the time. Ultimately if state education resembled what it should be then he’d probably be able to cope fairly well but because it is such a disgraceful shambles, he can’t and it’s done so much damage.

I’m just really shocked tbh that in the face of all of this evidence from so many different medical professionals they could behave in this way to a vulnerable child knowing the damage it’s doing, obstruct things at every possible stage. They really have no conscience at all.

What you say about EOTAS is very interesting. Would you mind sharing a little more about what that can look like, what kind of provision can be put in place? How it works day to day? I really feel like I’m feeling my way in the dark here despite having tried my best to research it all. It’s the most complicated and opaque system. I’ve done everything that was advised - independent assessments and reports, challenged decisions through tribunals, but it seems never-ending and designed to try NOT to give children what they need.

Funnily enough, my brother, also autistic went to Great Ballard for a while 30+ years ago. I hadn’t thought of checking there. He didn’t enjoy it, and is similar in some ways to my son, but not in terms of his sociability. And of course it may have changed a lot in 30 years anyway! I just don’t even know how you approach a private school to ask them about this? The LA won’t help me investigate options - they won’t even speak to me - so I would have to somehow do this myself? I can look at Slindon, More House, Northease Manor etc as well - thanks so much.

I will reply separately about my daughter in a minute but thank you so much for your advice and sorry this is so long. I really just do not know what to do now, it’s like endlessly bashing your head on a wall. I am in total autistic burnout myself tbh seeing their distress and trying to deal with that, deal with my daughter out of school for months on end, deal with them both coming home in pieces, hold down a full time job, fight these disgraceful people from the Council, try to hold my health together. It’s been horrific and I still can’t see any light at the end of the tunnel.

AlienOnEarth · 25/06/2025 14:27

DrRuthGalloway · 24/06/2025 20:05

Don't you have resourced units or provisions in any of your mainstream schools? These are often able to reduce the overwhelm in terms of people and sensory overload and provide a small peer group and close relationships with staff and they can be very successful for some able autistic youngsters (as long as there isn't a constant push to be in every mainstream lesson).

Edited

This would not be appropriate. In the “units” there is little academic teaching, and the classrooms where teaching is going on are an inappropriate environment. So they’re meant to do what? Alternate between a traumatic environment without too many people and too much noise and too much disruption, without appropriate teaching support and STILL usually not the appropriate level of academic challenge that they need; or they can choose to go and sit in a “unit”, be made to feel different from their peers (which they’re already self-conscious about), and have their senses not assaulted for a while but learn nothing?

This isn’t an answer. It would provide two environments neither one of which would meet their needs.

AlienOnEarth · 25/06/2025 14:34

BrumToTheRescue · 24/06/2025 20:12

For lots with the profile @AlienOnEarth describes, special support centres as they are called in WSCC don’t work because ultimately they are still part of the overwhelming mainstream school and they often don’t have a peer group within the unit.

Exactly. They could not cope with the huge groups and inappropriate teaching methods and lack of behaviour management and inappropriate level of work in the classrooms, and going off to a “unit” just to escape a traumatic environment for a while (and not even having subject specialists teaching them there) is providing them with an appropriate full time education how exactly? And they’d still be going into an enormous school every day full of people they don’t know, overwhelmed, AND being failed academically. And on top of this be made to feel like they are weird and don’t belong rather than being in an environment that’s actually appropriate for children like them.

It’s a bullshit “solution” created by these appalling Councils that does not meet the needs of many children and is designed purely to save them money. It doesn’t meet the needs of children like mine, at all.

Surely it’s not completely unreasonable to expect the state system (into which I’ve paid an enormous amount of tax for decades) to be able to provide an educational environment for children who are intelligent, keen to learn, not disruptive and simply need academic challenge differentiated for their ability level and NOT to be in a very loud, uncontrolled environment full of disruption and violence which the school does nothing about, as well as unacceptable levels of noise all day long?! This should be the STANDARD provision if the state was providing decent education.

Mammamia27373 · 25/06/2025 14:39

My child had their EP assessment for their EHCP by zoom (parent interview and teacher interview, never met the child) - can you really obtain enough information to write a report on their educational needs without ever meeting them?

Mammamia27373 · 25/06/2025 14:40

Do you advise parents on what kind of setting might be best for their child, or what direction or path might work best?