Fellow EP here
I occasionally use phrases such as "would benefit from" in the narrative part of the report and then specify and quantify in the outcomes section.
Eg in description of need "Mary is currently in year 5 and reading at a year 2 level. Parents and school share a reasonable anxiety that she will need continued direct literacy teaching after secondary transition. Mary would benefit from additional literacy teaching in small group or 1:1 on a daily basis" in the narrative
In the outcomes it would be
"By end of year 7, Mary will be confident at reading and spelling all year 5 word list, and will have a reading age of at least 8y 6m"
"To attain this: Daily literacy support in a group of no more than 4 for at least 20 mins, with a focus on phonological mastery and comprehension of texts. Teaching should be undertaken by a HLTA or teacher who has specialist literacy teaching qualifications"
I have specified EOTAS packages including outlining a suitable curriculum.
The LA pays me for my opinion and mine is a fairly benign LA. Over the years the occasional recommendation has made them cross but I point out to them that if I make a highly unusual recommendation it's because it's a highly unusual situation (resi for a 9 year old was one such occasion. He had a little sister who had to be locked into her room at night and they had netting all up the stairs and landing as he kept leaping off the bannisters. That family was on their knees. He had had an EHCP and attended specialist since age 3. Severe LD and autism).