Do you think that maybe that is just because MN will attract that type of person. Ie someone who had to drop out of school much younger, who has no family support or not as able to advocate for themselves is maybe more likely to end up as a street walker (as opposed to being a high class WG) and will therefore have a much more dangerous/miserable time than you did for significantly less money?
You've just reminded me of the time I saw a mumsnet post tilted 'Whats the difference between mumsnetters and netmums?' or something similar, and someone commented 'Fifteen grand a year'. I disagree with your point in some ways, but it has more to do with your idea of privilege than sex work.
I left school at 16 with 3 Standard Grades (I'm Scottish), left home, and got a job. At 18 (with nothing else to do) I went to college to do highers, and to my surprise, did well. I applied to uni through clearing and got a degree. While I am close to some family members, I would certainly not say I had family support.
I don't mean to bang on about myself here, rather I'm saying that by your idea of privilege (left school early, very poor, no traditional family support), I should be a street worker. It is much more complicated than that though, and I am aware that I am lucky.
I do agree with you that only vulnerable women are street workers, and I absolutely agree when you say indoor, independent workers have a better, and completely different, experience of prostitution. Again, I don't want to bang on because I have made this point again and again on this thread.