I was friends with a lap dancer when I was at university.
She was actually part of a breakdancing crew and they'd compete at international competitions. But there was no money in it, so to subsidise her breakdancing, she used to dance in the local strip clubs (I went to uni in London).
She did very well out of it and managed to buy her first flat just as I was graduating with £30k of debt. For her, lapdancing was just another way of performing and making money. She didn't really conflate it with anything sexual at all.
But, I am very aware that this is not the story for many other lap dancers. And I don't think it's accurate or fair to compare it to other industries or jobs where people may or may not be happy working in them.
Stripping/dancing is unique in that it's trading on women's sexuality - it necessarily objectifies them and reduces them to their attractiveness to men. And it's unique from male stripping because there is such a massive disparity in the size and value of the market. I've been around the block a few times but I have never met a woman who goes to a male strip club to spend half her weekly wages every Friday after work, for example.
And let's not be cute about it, there is a massive difference in the power dynamic between female audience and make stripper, vs male audience and female stripper. It really shouldn't even need explaining.
So, while this has been a very interesting thread, and my personal experience of knowing a lap dancer does comport with the OP's version; given the unique nature of the industry, I don't think you can or should have a conversation like this without looking at the whole picture. Because it's too important not to.
For me, it's like if it was 70 years ago and people were saying there's nothing wrong with black and white minstrel shows because everyone they know who's been in one or seen one thinks they're harmless and hilarious.