Mr markle child images?

No we aren’t, but authorities certainly should ask those questions.

We are not guilty of the sins of our parents.
She doesn’t need to clarify anything. Anymore than Andrew’s daughters were expected to offer clarification.

You know what you did.

You’re really not being as clever as you think are.

True, but this is Meghan Markle we're talking about. This latest story aside – and I genuinely do feel so sorry for her, because it must be crushing seeing these headlines about her dad and to be forced into having to have a conversation with her own children about it – she has monetised victimhood and I don't believe she wouldn't have thought to use her lived experience to gain sympathy during her Oprah/Netflix era.

Ok.

Well she may have to if a crime has been committed. Nobody knows what Andrew’s daughters were asked.

@Wafflesandcoffee

Er none of those links tell me what his daughters knew, what the Queen knew, when did they know it & what they did about it. Did you read them yourself?!

I doubt they were asked very much.
Andrew is a perverted man. I highly doubt that beautiful Virgina was the only youngster he had his creepy hands on. He didn’t clarify the details.

So your links were meaningless, glad you agree!

When someone attacks a person rather than the substance of a disagreement, they are at the lowest level of debate.

@Wafflesandcoffeewhy are you asking for clarification from Meghan when we didn’t get it from Andrew’s daughters? We do know that they still associated with Epstein post sex offender conviction.

The irony 😆😆😆

Not really, loads of questions were asked. I’m not aware of those though.

Where have I attacked anyone personally?

@Wafflesandcoffee gently, you are not debating!

You do know that a debate is asking questions, examining possibilities don’t you?

The allegations are sickening. They are reporting quite a lot of detail about what was found and it's very difficult to read.

Something really really terrible is happening here.

Either Mr Markle is a sick child abuser and possibly has been for a long time. In which case there are many many potential child victims.

This is a horrific possibility.

Or he is being framed by his own son in the most disturbing way imaginable.

Either way Meghan is from a deeply disturbed family.

The statement made by a source linked to her does need clarification as it does suggest she was aware of the alleged behaviours 8 years ago.
I would presume this statement isn't really from Meghan herself.

So you believe this is the reason she cut her father off? I know that’s what her ‘source’ has implied, but that would be,absolutely shocking if she suspected for 8 years and did nothing about it. She said in the Oprah interview, she cut him off for speaking to the media, she never even hinted there may be another reason. I do not believe she knew or suspected anything, but there will be plenty of people like you who will believe that was the real reason behind her cutting him off.

Meghan is ‘lucky’ in a way as she already hates her father, so this is not going to cut through her in the same way it would a much loved parent or family member. The worst part for her will be the media frenzy along with the “Wheres Kate” crazies coming out of the woodwork already to claim she is the one behind all this and set her father up.

I must say though, you do have to feel sorry for their kids growing up, their estranged grandfather potentially being a Paedophile, their fathers uncle being connected to a sex traffic ring and the little girls godfather accused of being a sexual predator. What an awful situation for any family.

Nah don't buy it.

A 80 year old man likely on long term libido reducing medication after his heart surgery 7 years prior and with ongoing health issues risked shipping 'thousands' of CSA images (presumably these are for sexual gratification right?) across the world into a small flat he shared with his son. The boxes sat in the small flat untouched for 2 years and then coincidentally the son who had recently been cut off financially after he stopped getting an allowance from his father, 'accidentally' finds all this while innocently going though his father's things looking for an old mobile phone to give to his girlfriend's father?

Jnr apparently gave up his life to move abroad to be his father's carer who he lived on the other side of the US from before, but didn't go with him to the US when he was emergency evacuated. Obviously made no attempt to pack up their tiny flat and return to the US to help care for his father, in what could be his last days, if he found this phone two months after his father had left and that wasn't via packing up. It was to give his father's property to his girlfriend's father!

I wonder if he's thinking the investigation won't be complete before Snr carks it or knows he's not medically fit to be questioned due to brain injury from his stroke?

Very convenient for someone who needs cash to come across this due to the media interest it would generate, and even more convenient for a nasty story about a father dying having been refused the opportunity to make peace with his very famous daughter, or ever meeting his grandchildren, to be given a very different spin.

Because of the statement from a friend that she was aware of these allegations 8 years ago.

It is in Meghans interest to be clear about this.

@Wafflesandcoffee is just stating a fact about what will be necessary for M following that unhelpful statement.

And yes if a statement was made by a friend of the Yorks that his daughters knew their father was abusing children a decade ago, they would need to address that.

I presume they would want to if it wasn't true?

You asked questions of Meghan, I asked have those same questions been asked & answered by Andrew’s family. You posted links saying yes whereas the links said nothing of the sort. You later said nobody knows what Andrew’s daughters were asked

I don’t class that as debating 🤷🏻‍♀️

The poster who said it was nonsense was closer to the mark…

I think the only point about Meghan is that by either having someone issue that statement to the press or by having friends that talk to the press without her knowledge, (the “now you know why since 2018”) it’s set off the people asking, “what have you known since 2018 and did you report your suspicions”. Again, she’s better off not making knee jerk clap backs via spokespeople/having friends that court media . I think she wants to distinguish herself from “never complain never explain” approach to PR. And tries to be honest (though it’s always her truth, not the truth). But it’s just not how media works. They always try to twist things for the best story. Regardless of truth.

so no, it’s nothing to do with her. But that statement now connects her. Because if she did have suspicions, who did she tell?

just really wish someone would sort out H&Ms media / pr.

I am just saying they have mandated reporters. So there is a list of professions/ jobs/ volunteers etc, where it is an offense not to report. If a mandated reporter knows of, or suspects abuse, and do not report it, it is an offense.

Its's a good system I reckon. So if a Church, School, organization etc suspect, but do not report, then yes, it's an offense. By the person not reporting.