Mr markle child images?

@Wafflesandcoffee

Er none of those links tell me what his daughters knew, what the Queen knew, when did they know it & what they did about it. Did you read them yourself?!

Nah don't buy it.

A 80 year old man likely on long term libido reducing medication after his heart surgery 7 years prior and with ongoing health issues risked shipping 'thousands' of CSA images (presumably these are for sexual gratification right?) across the world into a small flat he shared with his son. The boxes sat in the small flat untouched for 2 years and then coincidentally the son who had recently been cut off financially after he stopped getting an allowance from his father, 'accidentally' finds all this while innocently going though his father's things looking for an old mobile phone to give to his girlfriend's father?

Jnr apparently gave up his life to move abroad to be his father's carer who he lived on the other side of the US from before, but didn't go with him to the US when he was emergency evacuated. Obviously made no attempt to pack up their tiny flat and return to the US to help care for his father, in what could be his last days, if he found this phone two months after his father had left and that wasn't via packing up. It was to give his father's property to his girlfriend's father!

I wonder if he's thinking the investigation won't be complete before Snr carks it or knows he's not medically fit to be questioned due to brain injury from his stroke?

Very convenient for someone who needs cash to come across this due to the media interest it would generate, and even more convenient for a nasty story about a father dying having been refused the opportunity to make peace with his very famous daughter, or ever meeting his grandchildren, to be given a very different spin.

If she ‘knew’ why didn’t she report it to the authorities? The whole family seems to be difficult and toxic. What a situation!

When someone attacks a person rather than the substance of a disagreement, they are at the lowest level of debate.

I am just saying they have mandated reporters. So there is a list of professions/ jobs/ volunteers etc, where it is an offense not to report. If a mandated reporter knows of, or suspects abuse, and do not report it, it is an offense.

Its's a good system I reckon. So if a Church, School, organization etc suspect, but do not report, then yes, it's an offense. By the person not reporting.

The Queen wasn't a little innocent old lady. She was Head of State. She had access to high level intelligence, had security surrounding her and her family at all times. If she didn't know what her son was doing inside Buckingham Palace and while allegedly doing work for RF then it was because she deliberately chose not to hear what was being said to her. All the evidence points to her and everyone else in her circle knowing and her actively and aggressively getting it all covered up.

I agree

I think MM is not a person I would want to know.

But the Markles are just ghastly. Someone said upthread they thought he is a decent man. I don't agree. He has sold stories about her. He got his face on UK television a few years back and threatened to release a new story about her every day for 30 days unless she spoke to him. Thomas Markle (the son) has the most revolting channel on (is it youtube or tiktok?) where he says the most outrageously disgusting things about her. The step-sister similarly sells horrible stories. They are just a cesspit of toxicity and I don't blame MM for wanting to be as far away from them all as possible. To my mind it doesn't matter if the father paid for her schooling and helped her through college. He's done nothing except play the victim and try and destroy her publicly ever since. Looking at MM's own behaviour and burned bridges approach to life, then she may well be a chip off the old block or not, but I really don't think she should be blamed for wanting to grey rock him as far as possible.

I mean The Mail have had a reporter by Markles bedside for years, and his kids on speed dial. Surely they would have a safeguarding duty as a UK based organisation. Did their reporter know beforehand? They've been digging up dirt on Meghan for years yet none of them knew this?

You are attacking the person. You aren’t debating. You are ranting. You aren’t making points which is what happens in a debate.

I think the only point about Meghan is that by either having someone issue that statement to the press or by having friends that talk to the press without her knowledge, (the “now you know why since 2018”) it’s set off the people asking, “what have you known since 2018 and did you report your suspicions”. Again, she’s better off not making knee jerk clap backs via spokespeople/having friends that court media . I think she wants to distinguish herself from “never complain never explain” approach to PR. And tries to be honest (though it’s always her truth, not the truth). But it’s just not how media works. They always try to twist things for the best story. Regardless of truth.

so no, it’s nothing to do with her. But that statement now connects her. Because if she did have suspicions, who did she tell?

just really wish someone would sort out H&Ms media / pr.

You are attacking the person. You aren’t debating. You are ranting. You aren’t making points which is what happens in a debate.

@StrawberryWasp but we know the Yorks were still associating with Epstein post conviction

We know Virginia accused Andrew in 2011 & the Royal family still associated with him for many years. He only lost his title recently…

@WafflesandcoffeeI would say you were attacking Meghan. I don’t think the daughter should be blamed for the father’s sins. If you do why don’t you extend that to Andrew’s dc?

@WafflesandcoffeeI would say you were attacking Meghan. I don’t think the daughter should be blamed for the father’s sins. If you do why don’t you extend that to Andrew’s dc?

@StrawberryWasp but it has taken years and they clearly knew during all those years.

My point is we know what they knew but we have no idea what Meghan knew so why are people so quick to judge her based on a “source”.