Please or to access all these features

AIBU?

Share your dilemmas and get honest opinions from other Mumsnetters.

To think that Harry and his kids should have security

236 replies

Noras · 15/09/2026 12:24

Frankly I don’t want another year of wondering if Harry will attend another event or stay in a palace or will or will not get security etc.

For the sake of our sanity the matter needs to be resolved.

Harry could become a working royal and Meghan could go back to being an actress - they are then both happy

Harry and the kids get protection and Meghan can pay for her own

If Harry and the PoW could make up it would make next year much better ( 30 year anniversary)

Meghan needs to stop trading ( in my opinion) on the memory of Diana ( if it is true she wanted to do a speech re Diana etc) Leave Diana to the boys only.

There are innocent children involved and they do need protecting.

Harry needs to change his attitude and stop fighting the system for the sake of the nations sanity. Meghan has to realise that she upset many of us re the courtesy thing etc and the attack on the POW and POW.

The POW needs to realise that Harry can’t steal his thunder.

Everyone needs to think of King Charles who frankly needs to have a break from all this.

I am not a Meghan supporter or a bot. I just can’t bear another 3 months of frenzied speculation. My head is done in.

OP posts:
AlexandraCarrington · 15/09/2026 21:36

Not because I think succession to the throne is important, but because they are child who haven’t had the choice to be placed in the contentious life they have been placed in.

But what is the risk to them? That is what RAVEC bases its decisions on, not who they are.

Noodledog · 15/09/2026 21:39

Didimum · 15/09/2026 21:35

And - again - the thread is about whether we think they should get it. It’s no more simple or complicated than that. Maybe you shouldn’t give it so much head space.

Fair enough. I think you're wrong and have confusedly allowed yourself to get all caught up in the games H and M have been playing.

I'll stop trying to point out facts about the workings of armed security in the UK and let you get on with it.

Vannin · 15/09/2026 21:45

Didimum · 15/09/2026 21:18

I didn’t say they should get it because Harry and Megan want them to. I think they should get it regardless, and the OP asked if we think they should – simple as that. Harry and Megan could say they don’t think they need it tomorrow and I would still think they do.

Maybe lay off Megan’s Insta page for a while if it’s getting you a bit too riled up.

Maybe Meghan should lay off putting her kids on Instagram? They’re just young kids. They can’t consent.

Holeymoley28 · 15/09/2026 21:51

AI41 · 15/09/2026 21:29

This raises another question. When should Charlotte and Louis’s protection cease? At 18? When George has children? Should they only have it now if they’re with their parents or brother, but not for their own trips to school? It’s all so vague.

I think all armed security should be via threat.

General security for working royals and their families.

edit.

And by family I mean those in their direct family as in partner and minor children.

Somethinggg · 15/09/2026 21:56

AI41 · 15/09/2026 21:21

Harry does not want his security to be paid for by the public purse. He wants to be allowed to pay for armed security.

I wonder whether that's really true, but either way he shouldn't be able to because it shouldn't be for sale. To anyone.

If he needs it, we should all pay. If he doesn't, letting him buy it anyway means opening the doors to other people who don't need it also being able to buy it. That's a bad idea.

AI41 · 15/09/2026 21:58

Holeymoley28 · 15/09/2026 21:51

I think all armed security should be via threat.

General security for working royals and their families.

edit.

And by family I mean those in their direct family as in partner and minor children.

Edited

So you believe that the working royals should get more security than they do at the moment? It is interesting the range of opinions.

Holeymoley28 · 15/09/2026 22:01

AI41 · 15/09/2026 21:58

So you believe that the working royals should get more security than they do at the moment? It is interesting the range of opinions.

I’d assume they have general security as in look at where they live it’s basically in secure compounds that means there is security there all the time. The schools royals and celebs attended again will have some sort of basic security.

Kate was pictured driving the school run, bus up her bum one detail officer as passenger.

Id assume when shopping even then is likely one waiting in her car or also “shopping”.

Just real security blends in on a day to day basis it isn’t closing roads and flashing lights.

Holeymoley28 · 15/09/2026 22:02

Obviously at times roads are closed and the lights come on but that’s for big things generally and events.

Didimum · 15/09/2026 22:14

Noodledog · 15/09/2026 21:39

Fair enough. I think you're wrong and have confusedly allowed yourself to get all caught up in the games H and M have been playing.

I'll stop trying to point out facts about the workings of armed security in the UK and let you get on with it.

I don’t read anything about Harry and Megan. My opinion is based solely on what children in this amount of public eye should be afforded compared to their counterparts. End of.

Minasama · 15/09/2026 22:15

I agree with you.

mumumental · 15/09/2026 22:15

I can’t understand why the richest family in Britain struggles with this. They’re fucking skinflints, all of them.

Didimum · 15/09/2026 22:15

Vannin · 15/09/2026 21:45

Maybe Meghan should lay off putting her kids on Instagram? They’re just young kids. They can’t consent.

Where did I insinuate she shouldn’t?

AlexandraCarrington · 15/09/2026 22:16

My opinion is based solely on what children in this amount of public eye should be afforded compared to their counterparts. End of.

The children are not in the public eye.

I can’t understand why the richest family in Britain struggles with this.

Struggles with what? They can pay for private security if they want to. They can't have official security provided by the Met because that is at the discretion of RAVEC, and no-one else, not even 'the richest family in Britain', can demand it if RAVEC doesn't think it's justified.

JustAnotherWhinger · 15/09/2026 22:17

mumumental · 15/09/2026 22:15

I can’t understand why the richest family in Britain struggles with this. They’re fucking skinflints, all of them.

Harry struggles with it because you cannot buy the security he wants.

AI41 · 15/09/2026 22:25

Holeymoley28 · 15/09/2026 22:01

I’d assume they have general security as in look at where they live it’s basically in secure compounds that means there is security there all the time. The schools royals and celebs attended again will have some sort of basic security.

Kate was pictured driving the school run, bus up her bum one detail officer as passenger.

Id assume when shopping even then is likely one waiting in her car or also “shopping”.

Just real security blends in on a day to day basis it isn’t closing roads and flashing lights.

Charles, William and Kate (and the kids) get 24 hour state funded security. The rest of the working royals get it only when they’re at official functions.

Andrew, Beatrice and Eugenie also used to get state funded security, despite not being working royals, but now they don’t.

Before stepping down, Harry received 24 hour state funded security, which was different to the other working royals. This was because Harry was considered to be in a high threat tier. But to get the 24 hour state funded security the royal must both be in a high threat tier and be a working royal.

FridayNightBlues · 15/09/2026 22:30

Genuine question: why do they need security? Is there a genuine risk of anyone trying to hurt them? I mean more than any other famous person / celebrity?

Maomaotheapothecary · 15/09/2026 22:49

BarbaraUsher · 15/09/2026 12:51

Of course they need security. I’m stunned anyone could think the opposite.

Agreed. Of course they should have it. The mean spirited sentiment on here and in the UK generally about a couple of who have done nothing wrong is disgusting.

Not sure why any of this is 'doing your head in' OP. No one's forcing you to read or pay any attention to any of this.

OhNoooooooooooooooo · 15/09/2026 22:57

Maomaotheapothecary · 15/09/2026 22:49

Agreed. Of course they should have it. The mean spirited sentiment on here and in the UK generally about a couple of who have done nothing wrong is disgusting.

Not sure why any of this is 'doing your head in' OP. No one's forcing you to read or pay any attention to any of this.

They do have security....

They just don't have tax payer armed security which is what they want.

AI41 · 15/09/2026 22:57

FridayNightBlues · 15/09/2026 22:30

Genuine question: why do they need security? Is there a genuine risk of anyone trying to hurt them? I mean more than any other famous person / celebrity?

Al-Qaeda has called for his assassination and there have been credible threats from far right and Neo Nazi groups.

I do have some sympathy with him. How was the risk considered so severe before he left that he was placed in the highest possible threat category, and downgraded to case by case basis after leaving. I can see his point - the threat remains the same.

OhNoooooooooooooooo · 15/09/2026 22:59

FridayNightBlues · 15/09/2026 22:30

Genuine question: why do they need security? Is there a genuine risk of anyone trying to hurt them? I mean more than any other famous person / celebrity?

They're genuine targets for certain..

They need security.

But do they need armed security? Probably not really..

Especially if they stop telling everyone where they live, when they'll be there etc. and hire a security team that realises that term time traffic is worse than holidays....

OhNoooooooooooooooo · 15/09/2026 23:00

AI41 · 15/09/2026 22:57

Al-Qaeda has called for his assassination and there have been credible threats from far right and Neo Nazi groups.

I do have some sympathy with him. How was the risk considered so severe before he left that he was placed in the highest possible threat category, and downgraded to case by case basis after leaving. I can see his point - the threat remains the same.

That's for RAVEC to decide.

qamvbm · 15/09/2026 23:10

I am so tired of these liars dominating headlines. Just fuck off, shut up and have your privacy, preferably in the US. Any security required needs to be paid for by H&M. They have made millions by publicly trashing the RF and UK. TV, books, social media. It’s endless. Use the millions to pay for security.

AI41 · 15/09/2026 23:14

OhNoooooooooooooooo · 15/09/2026 23:00

That's for RAVEC to decide.

😂 This might not be the thread for you.

Tsubasa1 · 15/09/2026 23:15

They are millionares so can pay for their own protection

Idontpostmuch · 15/09/2026 23:59

Marycontrarygarden · 15/09/2026 12:25

Oh to have this much time on my hands 🙄🙄🙄🙄

Well, you clearly have time to scroll through Mumsnet and add eye rolls.

Swipe left for the next trending thread