Please or to access all these features

AIBU?

Share your dilemmas and get honest opinions from other Mumsnetters.

To think that Harry and his kids should have security

236 replies

Noras · 15/09/2026 12:24

Frankly I don’t want another year of wondering if Harry will attend another event or stay in a palace or will or will not get security etc.

For the sake of our sanity the matter needs to be resolved.

Harry could become a working royal and Meghan could go back to being an actress - they are then both happy

Harry and the kids get protection and Meghan can pay for her own

If Harry and the PoW could make up it would make next year much better ( 30 year anniversary)

Meghan needs to stop trading ( in my opinion) on the memory of Diana ( if it is true she wanted to do a speech re Diana etc) Leave Diana to the boys only.

There are innocent children involved and they do need protecting.

Harry needs to change his attitude and stop fighting the system for the sake of the nations sanity. Meghan has to realise that she upset many of us re the courtesy thing etc and the attack on the POW and POW.

The POW needs to realise that Harry can’t steal his thunder.

Everyone needs to think of King Charles who frankly needs to have a break from all this.

I am not a Meghan supporter or a bot. I just can’t bear another 3 months of frenzied speculation. My head is done in.

OP posts:
New posts on this thread. Refresh page
thisismeithinkorisit · 17/09/2026 10:30

Marycontrarygarden · 15/09/2026 12:25

Oh to have this much time on my hands 🙄🙄🙄🙄

so you habet got 4 minutes to type a post but you've got 2 minutes to read it and reply? I'm not sure you're that much more time poor than op?

LittleWeasel · 17/09/2026 10:27

What he wants is IPP status, so that for which ever country he and Meghan go to they get treated as very important people.

However they don’t want to represent the UK. Just seems they want to go in endless jaunts, collect goody bags at events, speak a few “bon mots” here and there, make trite programmes about their indulged lives and sell shite* to make money.

You would hope the children actually get to go to school to be educated and mix socially with other children their age so they develop into normal adjusted adults not spoilt nepo babies only able to live off social media grifting. That they learn to make real friends not false ones for endless “ scratch my back” opportunities.

*by sell shite I’m including books and podcasts

AI41 · 16/09/2026 23:16

OhNoooooooooooooooo · 16/09/2026 21:02

So they don't think he is now 🤷

He's not representing the crown anymore,so maybe his risk level dropped....

If he needed it, they'd provide it.

Sorry, but this is simply wrong. The security classification changed because he stopped being a working royal. Publicly funded armed security is only given to working royals. 24 hour publicly funded armed protection was only being received by QEII, C&C, Wales and Sussex families, because they were the only ones classified as needing top tier protection due to risk.

To reiterate, to get 24 hour publicly funded armed protection, you must both be classed as the severest of the risk groups and be a working royal.

Harry’s was removed because he stopped being a working royal, not because of a change in his risk classification.

He moved out of the UK which is when the decision was communicated that security would be looked at on a tailored basis when Harry was on UK soil, but that Harry would no longer have Internationally Protected Person status.

Now he’s back full time, the risks can’t only be considered when he has a trip home. The issue will have to be considered once again.

OhNoooooooooooooooo · 16/09/2026 21:02

AI41 · 16/09/2026 20:54

The professionals did classify Harry as the highest risk band for security though, along with the Wales family. Harry and family would still be getting it if they hadn’t left. It hasn’t reduced because of a reduction in threat. It’s due to them stepping down as working royals.

So they don't think he is now 🤷

He's not representing the crown anymore,so maybe his risk level dropped....

If he needed it, they'd provide it.

AI41 · 16/09/2026 20:54

OhNoooooooooooooooo · 16/09/2026 16:19

Well .... The professionals with security intelligence don't think they are.

Why do you think they are?

The professionals did classify Harry as the highest risk band for security though, along with the Wales family. Harry and family would still be getting it if they hadn’t left. It hasn’t reduced because of a reduction in threat. It’s due to them stepping down as working royals.

fridaynightzzz · 16/09/2026 20:26

If they had been successful in America they wouldn’t be asking for this. We aren’t the standby for his failures.

Horses7 · 16/09/2026 20:03

outerspacepotato · 16/09/2026 14:17

They don't work for the government or the royal family, why should their security be paid for by either of those?

They're private citizens and should be paying for their own like other famous private citizens do.

This !

Vaxtable · 16/09/2026 19:27

Bearing in mind a lot of the RF only get protection when they are working and Harry is not a working royal he can go jump

op I suggest you read the posts over on the royal family site lots of good information explaining exactly why this man child and his tantrum throwing wife don’t need security. They need to just shut up and move the quiet life they say they wanted in 2020

Didimum · 16/09/2026 19:14

OhNoooooooooooooooo · 16/09/2026 16:20

Well what only armed between 9-5? As if the threat is removed after tea time?

They either need armed security or they don't.

Why do you keep incessantly replying to me? I’ve said what I’ve said and it stands. Asking me in myriad different ways won’t change it. Again – go and bother someone else.

Didimum · 16/09/2026 19:11

OhNoooooooooooooooo · 16/09/2026 16:19

Well .... The professionals with security intelligence don't think they are.

Why do you think they are?

It’s a thread asking what people think. People will discuss what they think because there is a thread about it. If everyone agreed with the status quo of everything then there would be no discussion about anything.

Go and bother someone else.

OhNoooooooooooooooo · 16/09/2026 16:20

Didimum · 16/09/2026 15:03

I said think they should be provided with armed security. Nowhere did I say I 24/7 armed security.

I do think they are comparable to Wales’ children.

Info of their geographical location becoming available is moot. They can’t live in a black hole so it’s of no importance whether it’s known now or later.

Edited

Well what only armed between 9-5? As if the threat is removed after tea time?

They either need armed security or they don't.

OhNoooooooooooooooo · 16/09/2026 16:19

Didimum · 16/09/2026 15:57

I don’t agree they are less at risk. It’s ok though, we can disagree.

Well .... The professionals with security intelligence don't think they are.

Why do you think they are?

Didimum · 16/09/2026 15:57

Holeymoley28 · 16/09/2026 15:42

But they are provided with armed security. When there is a real threat.

Just not whenever they feel like. When a threat level hits the armed guard level.

They are not on level with the wales children at all. The wales children dad will be king. One of those children will be king and the others siblings to the king.

The Sussex children are lower down the peaking order making them lower risk and will continue to go further down the list once the wales children marry and have children. Other royals and not just ours manage perfectly fine without all this hoohaa.

I don’t agree they are less at risk. It’s ok though, we can disagree.

Holeymoley28 · 16/09/2026 15:42

Didimum · 16/09/2026 15:03

I said think they should be provided with armed security. Nowhere did I say I 24/7 armed security.

I do think they are comparable to Wales’ children.

Info of their geographical location becoming available is moot. They can’t live in a black hole so it’s of no importance whether it’s known now or later.

Edited

But they are provided with armed security. When there is a real threat.

Just not whenever they feel like. When a threat level hits the armed guard level.

They are not on level with the wales children at all. The wales children dad will be king. One of those children will be king and the others siblings to the king.

The Sussex children are lower down the peaking order making them lower risk and will continue to go further down the list once the wales children marry and have children. Other royals and not just ours manage perfectly fine without all this hoohaa.

AlexandraCarrington · 16/09/2026 15:12

I do think they are comparable to Wales’ children.

How? The Wales children take part in the public life of the nation, and as they get older will no doubt take part in public life in other Commonwealth countries.

The Sussex children do not. They are private citizens. That was the choice H&M made when they decided to step back from life as working royals.

Didimum · 16/09/2026 15:03

OhNoooooooooooooooo · 16/09/2026 14:12

but why? they aren't comparable. Just like Anne's children didn't get armed security..

Harry and family no doubt do have credible threats no doubt and they need security. Which they have.

but do they need 24 hour armed security provided by the state? the state dont; think so, and they know a bit more.

They aren't helping themselves by giving out their personal mobile numbers ... making it INCREDIBLY easy to find out what school their kids go to, not doing due diligence on routes, showing images of where they live, where they're going to be... etc

They until about a month ago were complaining how the family can't live in the uk... but weirdly moved here anyway, with big announcements and fuss. THey could have probalby quietly moved here and the general public would have been none the wiser for a fair amount of time. They got in and out of the UK in the summer with no fuss or bother...

Edited

I said think they should be provided with armed security. Nowhere did I say I 24/7 armed security.

I do think they are comparable to Wales’ children.

Info of their geographical location becoming available is moot. They can’t live in a black hole so it’s of no importance whether it’s known now or later.

janet1956 · 16/09/2026 15:00

hope you pay for it then

drivinmecrazy · 16/09/2026 14:39

Harry’s a plank.
he tells the world at every opportunity that he doesn’t have adequate protection yet can not see how this in itself creates a security risk.
must we fund protection for a person whom constantly risks his own security.
make it make sense please!

outerspacepotato · 16/09/2026 14:17

They don't work for the government or the royal family, why should their security be paid for by either of those?

They're private citizens and should be paying for their own like other famous private citizens do.

OhNoooooooooooooooo · 16/09/2026 14:12

Didimum · 16/09/2026 13:59

No. My opinion is based on the security privileges afforded to George, Charlotte and Louis.

but why? they aren't comparable. Just like Anne's children didn't get armed security..

Harry and family no doubt do have credible threats no doubt and they need security. Which they have.

but do they need 24 hour armed security provided by the state? the state dont; think so, and they know a bit more.

They aren't helping themselves by giving out their personal mobile numbers ... making it INCREDIBLY easy to find out what school their kids go to, not doing due diligence on routes, showing images of where they live, where they're going to be... etc

They until about a month ago were complaining how the family can't live in the uk... but weirdly moved here anyway, with big announcements and fuss. THey could have probalby quietly moved here and the general public would have been none the wiser for a fair amount of time. They got in and out of the UK in the summer with no fuss or bother...

Lugol · 16/09/2026 14:02

I really think you need to get our more OP if this is the sort of shit keeping you awake at night.

Didimum · 16/09/2026 13:59

Rhaidimiddim · 16/09/2026 10:38

So, if I create a social media presence for my child, build them a global identity, and pay magazines to publish stories about them on a weekly basis, the child should get paid-for state protection?

No. My opinion is based on the security privileges afforded to George, Charlotte and Louis.

AI41 · 16/09/2026 11:38

EasternStandard · 16/09/2026 08:00

Why not? It is for them to decide.

Because this thread is inviting our opinions. Obviously we don’t make the actual decision.

Rhaidimiddim · 16/09/2026 11:17

Holeymoley28 · 16/09/2026 11:12

Maybe that’s the goal of If I can’t have the throne nobody can!!!

Could you imagine this back in the days of killing to be king 😬

Driving thought Northumberland earlier in the year I had the thought...

Back in the day H would have landed in Northumberland and rallied an army to move South. He'd have taken Oxford before Christmas, despite the traffic jams.

Holeymoley28 · 16/09/2026 11:12

Rhaidimiddim · 16/09/2026 10:33

Image how you'd feel if you're doing the school run, been stuck for half an hour, and then along comes a convoy of nee-naws blue-lights-flashing-putting-on-the-speed forcing other cars to squeeze up (and further complicate the traffic jam.

Just so that the two kids of a non-working royal can get to school. Oh, and we are paying for the service.

That is what H wants. Talk about entitlement.

He's a republican's dream!

Maybe that’s the goal of If I can’t have the throne nobody can!!!

Could you imagine this back in the days of killing to be king 😬

Swipe left for the next trending thread