Women on MN: We accept you however you dress but it doesn't make you a woman. Please respect us and stop using use to validate yourself as a woman. You are not. It violates our privacy and dignity and leads to women self excluding. Third Party facilities are available so please use those rather than women's.
Trans Activists: Bigots. Die in a grease fire.
Women on MN: We have legal human rights as well as transwomen. We are not trying to harm anyone. We would just like legal protections which prevent men from abusing the law to be observed and enforced and we would like to be able to complain when this is not respected without fear that we will be doxed, reported to HR, suspended or otherwise unfairly treated at work.
Trans Activists: Bigots. Terfs are the worse kind of human they should be made to suffer.
Women on MN: There are lots of issues with this in schools and there's a lots of problems with how medicalising is being pushed without proper research and without ethical considerations. We need follow up on the existing people who transitioned as children before transitioning more. We need to stop and allow children to wait because all the evidence suggests that affirmation only approaches make it harder to desist. If just left to wait it out most kids will desist. The stats about suicide are misleading and this doesn't address mental health issues that persist after transition. There are concerns here and the evidence is beginning to build up to show significant malpractice in several countries.
Trans Activists: This is literal genocide.
Tommy Robinson: String of abuse.
If you are thinking posters on MN are like TR you are either illiterate or too lazy to bother to listen to what is being said and why.
The failure to address legitimate concerns only feeds dickheads like Robinson. It is the failure of allies and trans activists to have an adult conversation and instead scream transphobia like Muppets that is the problem. That's not the fault of women on MN who have just said this is about existing legal, ethical and workable considerations over safeguarding everyone - including those who identify as trans.
Engage. Listen. Get with the program.
It's not about being nice. It can't be. The law isn't ever written to be nice to people. It's about being fair to everyone and protecting everyone. It has to be workable. It has to not crash with other laws. This is ALL women are asking for. Fair considerations, recognition of their existing rights and protections and understanding that laws around voyeurism are absolutely still existent and remain relevant. The law isn't about fuzzy feelings. Fuzzy indefinable feelings are nonsense in legal terms.
Many here have trans identifying relations are concerned that failures in understanding the law will harm their relatives - far from hating trans people, some of the posters on MN are the most concerned people about the welfare of trans identifying people.
Trans people acknowledge their sex when identifying as trans. It also provides protections in law. Otherwise they cease to have them at all. gays and lesbians also need biological sex acknowledged as they otherwise lose protections. As do women. There are three groups here. Also we need to protect disabled individuals and since there is above the expect rate of neurodiverse people who are transitioning we need to be careful about that too. And we need to concern concerns about children - there are multiple groups within the trans identifying community we are talking about - it is not a single cohort. The interests of all these groups should be considered.
There are a significant number of interest groups here. Recognise them.
Understand this a deeply complex subject. Not a simple transpeople=good MN=bad, brain dead level of thinking.