Please or to access all these features

AIBU?

Share your dilemmas and get honest opinions from other Mumsnetters.

See all MNHQ comments on this thread

Whole families on UC, PIP, DLA and carers' allowance for each other?

1000 replies

Hutinthemiddleofnowhere · 05/09/2026 23:03

This isn't a bashing, rather a genuine observation and we're privileged in the UK to have support with benefits and disabilities.

Having adopted 2 siblings with special needs over a decade ago it opened me up to a whole new world to me. With DC in specialist schools and needing a lot of intervention from agencies and medical support I've met so many parents and children. As a teacher this was so insightful and, while having always been extra devoted to students who had difficulties, my own experience as a parent took it to another level.

Teaching, I was always aware and sympathetic to those who barely made it to lesson, almost fell asleep but professionally had to adhere to the 'not participating' and when told to 'fuck off' it was call out. I knew there would be further investigation as to why they act like this by more able and senior colleagues. Didn't take it personally but, as you can imagine, it's difficult when you have several students like this while under the pressure of teaching a tricky maths part of the syllabus.

So as a parent of ND DC I experienced it from the other side. It was very difficult because our DC were causing disruptions due to their severe diagnosis.

Throughout our journey and specialist schools I saw a lot of reality. This comes (finally) back to my point. Year after year it became blatantly obvious that the vast majority of children have parents with their own issues, whether hereditary or learnt behaviour.

I got a job at the primary school as a liason officer so met most parents. All lovely and care about their DC but sadly struggled with managing themselves, their homes etc. Those few who weren't eligible for taxis and escorts (walkable distance) relied heavily on GPs to take and pick up from school. There were some parents who did drive and drop off, like me, but it was about 5%.

So mostly the parents were on UC, claimed PIp for anxiety and MH, got DLA for all DC and also carers' allowance for looking after DC. While i visited it was clear they were were reclusive, their days were spent watching TV, gaming, DC picked up in a taxi and they had struggled to get out of bed, knew they are provided breakfast at school, went back to bed. Yes I've seen this on an early morning visit multiple times.

I understand but also a part of me felt frustrated that they had fallen into a rut, able bodied, could have long conversations, but have had so much support that has enabled this.

As a school we reached out to parents to come and integrate, provided workshops, held informal educational classes how we can help our DC. As a parent and before being employed there I attended these and it so nice to meet other parents. The reality... they just sat there, being served coffee by an already busy TA, talked all the way through the presentations then left, after already leaving several times for a smoke during an hour and half get together. Still as an attending parent at this point I could see TA was struggling so stepped in to help serve the refreshments, set up equipment and clear up afterwards. One Mum asked me to open a window, another asked to give her some biscuits...I was the same as them, a parent, but they were just totally oblivious to the situation.

Then walking out, having cleaned up and they were chatting outside, all I heard was that was so boring, I know how to bring up my kids, waste of time coming out, so what you doing now, probably Netflix.

Then getting the role and seeing deeper into their lifestyles it confirmed that actually so many of these parents had come from a generational cycle with low aspirations and no encouragement within modern education, social workers or support from us all could change their mindsets of behaviour. Sadly it really is a case of we get money, DC have their consoles, school provides meals and exercise, bags of amazing stuff at Christmas and end of year which we don't even say thank you for, we can complain online if we don't like something etc.

This is just the basic circumstances, delve deeper and you would be shocked at how some of these poor kids live. A whole different thread would have to be made about drug dealing, violence, not allowing DC in the house so they have to become one of the balaclava gangs and so much more.

As parents, even if we have our own issues, we all need to put our DC first, not rely on others to do it for us.

OP posts:
Thread gallery
5
ChloeKellys · 13/09/2026 09:14

Zero hours contracts surely they should be there for those who WANT to do it

TigerRag · 13/09/2026 09:18

FirmSnake · 12/09/2026 17:59

Just curious, how does PIP fund prompting to get dressed for work in the morning? What exactly are you suggesting people are paying for in this regard?

That would only get you two points and you need at least eight to get pip

OneLilacHedgehog · 13/09/2026 09:23

TigerRag · 13/09/2026 07:46

That wouldn't be enough for a pip award. You'd have to score points in planning and following a journey too

So walking very slowly for 200 metres and then having to use a wheelchair doesn't count as I thought.

roaringdragon · 13/09/2026 09:32

OneLilacHedgehog · 13/09/2026 09:23

So walking very slowly for 200 metres and then having to use a wheelchair doesn't count as I thought.

You have misunderstood that poster.

Can stand and move, either aided or unaided, for more than 200m scores 0 points. But if you can only do this much slower than is typical then for the purposes of PIP, you cannot reliably do it.

Being unable to stand and then move 200m, aided or unaided, would score at least 4 points. But, on its own, wouldn’t necessarily be enough to get PIP as you need at least 8, which is what the pp meant. If you only scored 4 points on the moving around activity you would also need points on the planning and following a journey activity in order to be awarded PIP, which is what the pp meant.

You made no mention of shorter distances, so would need more information to know how many points you would get.
Being able to stand and then move more than 50m but no more than 200m, either aided or unaided, is 4 points.
Being able to stand and then move unaided more than 20m but no more than 50m is 8 points.
Being able to stand and then move using an aid or appliance more than 20m but no more than 50m is 10 points.
Being able to stand and then move more than 1m but no more than 20m, either aided or unaided, is 12 points.
Cannot, either aided or unaided, stand or move more than 1m is 12 points.

x2boys · 13/09/2026 09:34

Greenismyfavouritecolournow · 13/09/2026 04:29

No one has a luxury lifestyle on minimum wage age either. But if you could have the ‘same ‘ lifestyle without any effort whatsoever and all the free time in the world? Which one do you think some people would pick?
I mean I enjoy my job and it’s important for my mental health but if someone gave me the same full time salary to stay at home I’m sure I could find something to fill my time. That’s the issue. Work to be a small amount of money better off per week or have your week to yourself to do as you please?

I wss responding to a poster who suggested people on universal credit were swanning around in designer gear and could afford the latest i phone
Also many peoole on minimum wage will also be entitled to UC

YourGoldLurker · 13/09/2026 10:57

Greenismyfavouritecolournow · 13/09/2026 04:29

No one has a luxury lifestyle on minimum wage age either. But if you could have the ‘same ‘ lifestyle without any effort whatsoever and all the free time in the world? Which one do you think some people would pick?
I mean I enjoy my job and it’s important for my mental health but if someone gave me the same full time salary to stay at home I’m sure I could find something to fill my time. That’s the issue. Work to be a small amount of money better off per week or have your week to yourself to do as you please?

Would you want to have the associated disabilities that go along with getting that extra money? Also. I think it's important to clarify that not everyone on benefits gets a "full time salary". As I said earlier in the thread the daily living component for MH on Pip is 76.70 a week. That's not a full time salary.

People have also said in this thread that disability awards are often limited. My LCWRA and Pip awards were both time limited -because I had a fracture. I'm still in pain two years on -but not to the extent I was

The reason I ended up getting LCWRA in the first place was because I slipped going downstairs. I broke my tibia my fibula and my medial which is one of the worst combinations you can break. I had to have my leg pinned back together. I couldn't weight bear for four months

And even then the DWP said that I would be fit to work three months after my accident. I didn't get that award until a tribunal overturned the original decision.

Would you like to go through that just to have an extra 424 pounds a month? I didn't choose for that to happen to me.

I also didn't choose to have PTSD -and I've said this in other posts. I have never been awarded LCWRA for mental health. It's not easy to get.

What makes you think that getting PIP and LCWRA is easy to get in the first place? And if you think that getting PIP and LCWRA is the equivalent of a full time wage then surely you understand that many people don't get both daily living and mobility for Pip. Some people get one but not the other. Some people get Pip but not LCWRA. And these benefits can be taken away at any time after a review.

The LCWRA rate has also been cut in half for new claimants. You don't seem to understand that some people who get Pip have profound disabilities. That's why they get the award. Not just "free money " so people can sit around doing nothing.

There are people who use Pip to pay for carers. Or to adapt transport so they can drive. Some disabilities come with associated costs.

There are also people who get Pip and LCWRA that work.

Assuming that you have MH issues and no physical disabilities if you got standard daily living for your mental health and LCWRA at the new rate plus UC you would get 11692 plus housing costs.

That's not equivalent to a full time min wage job.

You'd give up your job for that ? And there's no guarantee if you applied for both LCWRA and Pip that you would get both or either of them. As I said in earlier posts I tried three times to get LCWRA for mental health. I scored 0 points every time. I also scored 0 points when I broke my leg. I was initially put into the LCW group but only because I was in hospital and the assessor had to put me in the LCW group.

Reddit has several benefit advice threads (UK). Some of the mods who staff it work for the DWP. If you go on there you'll see lots of stories of people with disabilities scoring zero points on Pip and LCWRA and people who's conditions haven't changed scoring zero points on review.

Do you think people choose to be disabled?

YourGoldLurker · 13/09/2026 11:03

NotYetHeating · 13/09/2026 02:21

Since the Uk is in dire straits re it’s low growth, rising debt, rising unemployment etc, the problem will fix itself.
Either reform gets in and fixes it. Looking more likely with all the huge donation.
Failing that we have the IMF imposing huge cuts after our already fragile economy falls over (reckon this winter with the bond market, food shortages and energy prices alongside the rising unemployment, the AI bubble bursting ought to do it)
Either way those self supporting will be okay although perhaps not great. The rest probably won’t be. I guess ‘survival of the fittest’ and all that.
Most people are utterly sleepwalking re the perilous state of the uk. Other countries have their issues but the Uk really does seem to be about to hit a perfect storm.

I don't really think we should be talking about survival of the fittest on a thread about disabilities. Reform and restore Britain have made it clear exactly how they feel about disabled people

YourGoldLurker · 13/09/2026 11:09

OonaStubbs · 12/09/2026 17:19

We need to rethink benefits in this country because they are seriously ruining people's lives. Telling people they don't need to work due to anxiety is just cruel, especially when there's a decent chance at some point they will be told that they will have to work after all, and that's after years of social isolation.

No one is told they need not to work due to "anxiety". You clearly have never been through the process of trying to get disability benefits. Pip doesn't switch off someone's job seeking requirements. Only Lcwra does that and it is hugely difficult to get a LCWRA award for anxiety. I had anxiety depression and PTSD and I scored zero points. Therefore according to the DWP I was fit to work and had to look for work.

Someone on UC and Pip unless there are other factors involved such as caring responsibilities will be expected by the job centre to look for work

The other day you suggested they're should be no UC at all.

YourGoldLurker · 13/09/2026 11:21

I think it's important to make clear that you would only generally have your job seeking requirements switched off if you were on UC and pip is if you had specific caring responsibilities such as looking after someone 35 hours a week and them being on a qualifying benefit. Otherwise you still have to look for work under UC rules

EvieBB · 13/09/2026 12:04

FirmSnake · 12/09/2026 09:01

Yes? So the only reason they get is because of mental health.

That should say, mental health 'problems/issues'.
It annoys me when people say 'mental health'.
Nobody gets benefits because of "health".
They get it because of lack of 'health".

YourGoldLurker · 13/09/2026 13:10

We aren't the only European country who has a benefit system for people with disabilities. But there's an attitude to people here who claim Uc never mind people with disabilities. People are seen as scroungers and if you are disabled then you are a worse scrounger

The media amplifies this because of course everyone on UC is living the high life on benefits.and if you are disabled you are seen as a worse scrounger and of course everyone gets Pip for "anxiety". The inference being that Pip is so easy to get. (And that anxiety isn't really a mental health condition).

Its absolutely fine if some people with serious mental health issues can work. But some people can't.

There was a comment earlier about how being on benefits for anxiety is ruining people's lives. I actually don't have my job seeking requirements switched off for my mental health. But the fact that they have been switched off has given me space to try and recover as much as I can without having to worry every minute of the day about being offered a job, having to take it up and then being sanctioned because I couldn't hold it down.

The second time I applied for Lcwra I asked a welfare rights team to help me with the application. I had to talk about the trauma I had been through. I cried most of the way through the appointment. Zero points.

People sitting on here deducing that it's really easy to get disability benefits for mental health issues clearly haven't been through the process themselves.

I am socially isolated too but its my mental health that caused this. People can be socially isolated on basic UC without having any extra money on top.

And yes. There might come a time in the near future that UC is time limited and benefits will be cut if people don't find work in a specific timescale -but that's not going to solve the issue of unemployment. There's always going to be unemployment irrespective of benefit cuts.

Lougle · 13/09/2026 13:12

roaringdragon · 13/09/2026 09:32

You have misunderstood that poster.

Can stand and move, either aided or unaided, for more than 200m scores 0 points. But if you can only do this much slower than is typical then for the purposes of PIP, you cannot reliably do it.

Being unable to stand and then move 200m, aided or unaided, would score at least 4 points. But, on its own, wouldn’t necessarily be enough to get PIP as you need at least 8, which is what the pp meant. If you only scored 4 points on the moving around activity you would also need points on the planning and following a journey activity in order to be awarded PIP, which is what the pp meant.

You made no mention of shorter distances, so would need more information to know how many points you would get.
Being able to stand and then move more than 50m but no more than 200m, either aided or unaided, is 4 points.
Being able to stand and then move unaided more than 20m but no more than 50m is 8 points.
Being able to stand and then move using an aid or appliance more than 20m but no more than 50m is 10 points.
Being able to stand and then move more than 1m but no more than 20m, either aided or unaided, is 12 points.
Cannot, either aided or unaided, stand or move more than 1m is 12 points.

Edited

This is why the definitions are so important.

You may say "I can stand and walk 200m but I'm very slow." You might think, ok, so I can't stand and walk 200m because it takes twice as long as normal, but I can walk 50m at normal pace.

Someone who understands the definitions might then ask you if you experience pain when you walk 50m, and if you would be able to do it again.

If it turns out that you have to stop several times because of the pain, or you could do it but then you needed to lie down for 2 hours afterwards, or you couldn't walk the journey back, or you couldn't go out the next day because walking 50m caused too much pain or fatigue, then again you 'can't' walk 50m, even if you can physically take the steps.

Just like the dressing activity. If someone can dress themselves but they can't choose appropriate clothing, they can't decide that something is dirty, or stained, etc., and they can't appreciate why it isn't socially acceptable to wear clean clothing, or they can't understand why it's important wear weather appropriate clothing, they should score points for dressing even if they can physically get dressed.

Someone may be able to cook, but they may not be able to determine if something is safe to eat, or is well enough cooked. They may not be able to lift a pan without burning themselves. They may not be able to remember to turn the heat off. They may not be able to use a knife safety, etc. They would score points.

Someone may be able to have limited social interaction day to day, but need therapy sessions for their social communication. The fact that they need those sessions is enough to say that they need support for social communication, even if they don't need someone with them every time they interact socially.

roaringdragon · 13/09/2026 13:45

I completely agree @Lougle. So many people make judgements about PIP without actually understanding the criteria. It is quite clear that despite what the pp said she does not understand the PIP descriptors even though I have repeatedly explained that in order to be able to do an activity you have to be able to do it reliably and that means safely, to an acceptable standard, repeatedly and in a reasonable time frame.

Greenismyfavouritecolournow · 13/09/2026 14:27

YourGoldLurker · 13/09/2026 10:57

Would you want to have the associated disabilities that go along with getting that extra money? Also. I think it's important to clarify that not everyone on benefits gets a "full time salary". As I said earlier in the thread the daily living component for MH on Pip is 76.70 a week. That's not a full time salary.

People have also said in this thread that disability awards are often limited. My LCWRA and Pip awards were both time limited -because I had a fracture. I'm still in pain two years on -but not to the extent I was

The reason I ended up getting LCWRA in the first place was because I slipped going downstairs. I broke my tibia my fibula and my medial which is one of the worst combinations you can break. I had to have my leg pinned back together. I couldn't weight bear for four months

And even then the DWP said that I would be fit to work three months after my accident. I didn't get that award until a tribunal overturned the original decision.

Would you like to go through that just to have an extra 424 pounds a month? I didn't choose for that to happen to me.

I also didn't choose to have PTSD -and I've said this in other posts. I have never been awarded LCWRA for mental health. It's not easy to get.

What makes you think that getting PIP and LCWRA is easy to get in the first place? And if you think that getting PIP and LCWRA is the equivalent of a full time wage then surely you understand that many people don't get both daily living and mobility for Pip. Some people get one but not the other. Some people get Pip but not LCWRA. And these benefits can be taken away at any time after a review.

The LCWRA rate has also been cut in half for new claimants. You don't seem to understand that some people who get Pip have profound disabilities. That's why they get the award. Not just "free money " so people can sit around doing nothing.

There are people who use Pip to pay for carers. Or to adapt transport so they can drive. Some disabilities come with associated costs.

There are also people who get Pip and LCWRA that work.

Assuming that you have MH issues and no physical disabilities if you got standard daily living for your mental health and LCWRA at the new rate plus UC you would get 11692 plus housing costs.

That's not equivalent to a full time min wage job.

You'd give up your job for that ? And there's no guarantee if you applied for both LCWRA and Pip that you would get both or either of them. As I said in earlier posts I tried three times to get LCWRA for mental health. I scored 0 points every time. I also scored 0 points when I broke my leg. I was initially put into the LCW group but only because I was in hospital and the assessor had to put me in the LCW group.

Reddit has several benefit advice threads (UK). Some of the mods who staff it work for the DWP. If you go on there you'll see lots of stories of people with disabilities scoring zero points on Pip and LCWRA and people who's conditions haven't changed scoring zero points on review.

Do you think people choose to be disabled?

Where did I mention disabled people? But don’t fool yourself there are people who will pretend to have conditions just so they don’t have to work. Not everyone is honest like you. People do play the system . You’re breaking down a single payment but you have to look collectively at the bigger picture.
Rent help, sickness benefits, fsm, prescriptions, dental , warm homes, then you add in the carers payments- if you can get the first child diagnosed then you know what to do to get the second and so on. If you do not believe this happens then more fool you.
Just because you are genuine doesn’t mean everyone is.
And no I wouldn’t give my job up for benefits because I earn considerably more than benefits and I’m invested in my retirement plans and my children’s futures. HOWEVER , if I was working a crappy job on minimum wage and had perhaps experienced pnd I’d be tempted to drag it out a bit to stay at home for longer. Why would I go to work for an extra ££ a week when I could lower my expectations and have all the time in the world to do what I want? I can get household items from freecycle or Facebook, I can get free food from food banks, I can pick up some stuff from charity shops and sell them on Vinted. Wee spot of cash in hand cleaning for the local pub or a few hours in the local Chinese. If you don’t think this happens then fair enough but it does and I’ve seen it in my own village. Tenants claiming they live alone to get housing benefits when their partner supposedly lives with his mum down the road. I don’t always blame them because they are just trying to survive but it does happen.

Kirbert2 · 13/09/2026 14:31

Greenismyfavouritecolournow · 13/09/2026 14:27

Where did I mention disabled people? But don’t fool yourself there are people who will pretend to have conditions just so they don’t have to work. Not everyone is honest like you. People do play the system . You’re breaking down a single payment but you have to look collectively at the bigger picture.
Rent help, sickness benefits, fsm, prescriptions, dental , warm homes, then you add in the carers payments- if you can get the first child diagnosed then you know what to do to get the second and so on. If you do not believe this happens then more fool you.
Just because you are genuine doesn’t mean everyone is.
And no I wouldn’t give my job up for benefits because I earn considerably more than benefits and I’m invested in my retirement plans and my children’s futures. HOWEVER , if I was working a crappy job on minimum wage and had perhaps experienced pnd I’d be tempted to drag it out a bit to stay at home for longer. Why would I go to work for an extra ££ a week when I could lower my expectations and have all the time in the world to do what I want? I can get household items from freecycle or Facebook, I can get free food from food banks, I can pick up some stuff from charity shops and sell them on Vinted. Wee spot of cash in hand cleaning for the local pub or a few hours in the local Chinese. If you don’t think this happens then fair enough but it does and I’ve seen it in my own village. Tenants claiming they live alone to get housing benefits when their partner supposedly lives with his mum down the road. I don’t always blame them because they are just trying to survive but it does happen.

You mean like knowing a child doesn't even need a diagnosis to be eligible for DLA?

Greenismyfavouritecolournow · 13/09/2026 14:31

YourGoldLurker · 13/09/2026 10:57

Would you want to have the associated disabilities that go along with getting that extra money? Also. I think it's important to clarify that not everyone on benefits gets a "full time salary". As I said earlier in the thread the daily living component for MH on Pip is 76.70 a week. That's not a full time salary.

People have also said in this thread that disability awards are often limited. My LCWRA and Pip awards were both time limited -because I had a fracture. I'm still in pain two years on -but not to the extent I was

The reason I ended up getting LCWRA in the first place was because I slipped going downstairs. I broke my tibia my fibula and my medial which is one of the worst combinations you can break. I had to have my leg pinned back together. I couldn't weight bear for four months

And even then the DWP said that I would be fit to work three months after my accident. I didn't get that award until a tribunal overturned the original decision.

Would you like to go through that just to have an extra 424 pounds a month? I didn't choose for that to happen to me.

I also didn't choose to have PTSD -and I've said this in other posts. I have never been awarded LCWRA for mental health. It's not easy to get.

What makes you think that getting PIP and LCWRA is easy to get in the first place? And if you think that getting PIP and LCWRA is the equivalent of a full time wage then surely you understand that many people don't get both daily living and mobility for Pip. Some people get one but not the other. Some people get Pip but not LCWRA. And these benefits can be taken away at any time after a review.

The LCWRA rate has also been cut in half for new claimants. You don't seem to understand that some people who get Pip have profound disabilities. That's why they get the award. Not just "free money " so people can sit around doing nothing.

There are people who use Pip to pay for carers. Or to adapt transport so they can drive. Some disabilities come with associated costs.

There are also people who get Pip and LCWRA that work.

Assuming that you have MH issues and no physical disabilities if you got standard daily living for your mental health and LCWRA at the new rate plus UC you would get 11692 plus housing costs.

That's not equivalent to a full time min wage job.

You'd give up your job for that ? And there's no guarantee if you applied for both LCWRA and Pip that you would get both or either of them. As I said in earlier posts I tried three times to get LCWRA for mental health. I scored 0 points every time. I also scored 0 points when I broke my leg. I was initially put into the LCW group but only because I was in hospital and the assessor had to put me in the LCW group.

Reddit has several benefit advice threads (UK). Some of the mods who staff it work for the DWP. If you go on there you'll see lots of stories of people with disabilities scoring zero points on Pip and LCWRA and people who's conditions haven't changed scoring zero points on review.

Do you think people choose to be disabled?

Your broke your leg ! You’re not disabled. I wouldn’t give up my job if I broke my leg because I would intend to go back to work. Is that not what you intended to do? I’m sorry you broke your leg . Broken bones hurt.

ChloeKellys · 13/09/2026 14:34

I know one person (admittedly it's only one) who is a recent graduate who got a 2.1 from a crappy low ranked uni and admitted to us they used UC and PIP (autism) to buy weed, alcohol and go on holiday.

Greenismyfavouritecolournow · 13/09/2026 14:37

Kirbert2 · 13/09/2026 14:31

You mean like knowing a child doesn't even need a diagnosis to be eligible for DLA?

??

I don’t understand what you are implying.

Kirbert2 · 13/09/2026 14:42

Greenismyfavouritecolournow · 13/09/2026 14:37

??

I don’t understand what you are implying.

You were saying that some parents only get their child diagnosed for money?

A diagnosis isn't necessary for DLA so I'm not sure why they would go through all of that effort for no reason.

roaringdragon · 13/09/2026 14:46

Greenismyfavouritecolournow · 13/09/2026 14:27

Where did I mention disabled people? But don’t fool yourself there are people who will pretend to have conditions just so they don’t have to work. Not everyone is honest like you. People do play the system . You’re breaking down a single payment but you have to look collectively at the bigger picture.
Rent help, sickness benefits, fsm, prescriptions, dental , warm homes, then you add in the carers payments- if you can get the first child diagnosed then you know what to do to get the second and so on. If you do not believe this happens then more fool you.
Just because you are genuine doesn’t mean everyone is.
And no I wouldn’t give my job up for benefits because I earn considerably more than benefits and I’m invested in my retirement plans and my children’s futures. HOWEVER , if I was working a crappy job on minimum wage and had perhaps experienced pnd I’d be tempted to drag it out a bit to stay at home for longer. Why would I go to work for an extra ££ a week when I could lower my expectations and have all the time in the world to do what I want? I can get household items from freecycle or Facebook, I can get free food from food banks, I can pick up some stuff from charity shops and sell them on Vinted. Wee spot of cash in hand cleaning for the local pub or a few hours in the local Chinese. If you don’t think this happens then fair enough but it does and I’ve seen it in my own village. Tenants claiming they live alone to get housing benefits when their partner supposedly lives with his mum down the road. I don’t always blame them because they are just trying to survive but it does happen.

The whole thread is about disabled people and their carers.

A diagnosis doesn’t result in more money. DLA is based on needs. It also isn’t enough to claim difficulties, you need actual evidence whether that is for a first child or second.

Help with rent, FSM, free or reduced prescriptions and dental treatment and the warm home discount are not limited to those with disabilities. Many who work receive some or all of that support too. You can still use freecycle or Facebook and work. Food banks aren’t limited to those who don’t work either.

x2boys · 13/09/2026 14:49

ChloeKellys · 13/09/2026 14:34

I know one person (admittedly it's only one) who is a recent graduate who got a 2.1 from a crappy low ranked uni and admitted to us they used UC and PIP (autism) to buy weed, alcohol and go on holiday.

Im not sure the relvance of the " crap university "
But people cam choose to spend their PIP how they want
I wouldnt go round bragging that i was spending it all on weed and alcohol and i dont know any one that would apart firom posters on here who slways know somone getting disabillity benefits who shouldnt be....

YourGoldLurker · 13/09/2026 14:51

Greenismyfavouritecolournow · 13/09/2026 14:31

Your broke your leg ! You’re not disabled. I wouldn’t give up my job if I broke my leg because I would intend to go back to work. Is that not what you intended to do? I’m sorry you broke your leg . Broken bones hurt.

I had a triple leg fracture that had to be operated on. I broke three bones in my leg My leg had to be pinned back together. I have a ten inch plate in my left leg and two screws in my ankle. I couldn't weight bear for months, I was told not to and was housebound. (I live in an upstairs flat).

I didn't give up my job. I had just been offered a job that I couldn't take up because they took so long with the reference checks that I was in hospital by the time that the checks went through. If you're trying to suggest I gave up a job to sit on benefits you are completely wrong.

You're sorry I broke my leg. Really doesn't sound like it.

YourGoldLurker · 13/09/2026 14:54

ChloeKellys · 13/09/2026 14:34

I know one person (admittedly it's only one) who is a recent graduate who got a 2.1 from a crappy low ranked uni and admitted to us they used UC and PIP (autism) to buy weed, alcohol and go on holiday.

You don't get UC as a full time student with disabilities unless you are on Pip and LCWRA

YourGoldLurker · 13/09/2026 14:56

roaringdragon · 13/09/2026 14:46

The whole thread is about disabled people and their carers.

A diagnosis doesn’t result in more money. DLA is based on needs. It also isn’t enough to claim difficulties, you need actual evidence whether that is for a first child or second.

Help with rent, FSM, free or reduced prescriptions and dental treatment and the warm home discount are not limited to those with disabilities. Many who work receive some or all of that support too. You can still use freecycle or Facebook and work. Food banks aren’t limited to those who don’t work either.

I don't automatically qualify for the warm home discount even though I'm on ADP and get LCWRA. I have to apply through the broader group and its only been the last couple of years that Ive got it

roaringdragon · 13/09/2026 15:02

YourGoldLurker · 13/09/2026 14:54

You don't get UC as a full time student with disabilities unless you are on Pip and LCWRA

You can be eligible with LCW. It is not just LCWRA.

Please create an account

To comment on this thread you need to create a Mumsnet account.

This thread is not accepting new messages.
Swipe left for the next trending thread