Help end medical misogyny. Sign our petition.

Help end medical misogyny.
Sign our petition.

Sign the petition

Please or to access all these features

AIBU?

Share your dilemmas and get honest opinions from other Mumsnetters.

Is 46/ 47 too late for first baby?

1000 replies

Everythingnotsaved · 12/07/2020 19:03

My friend really wants a baby & is nearly 46 & would probably be 47 by the time baby came. I always read really really different views on mumsnet about babies and pregnancy and age so thought I’d ask:

Yanbu- it’s too old
Yabu- it’s entirely possible

I am assuming shes looking at donor eggs but is it just about that - what about the child too with older parents? I don’t know what I think really.

OP posts:
ShastaBeast · 12/07/2020 19:06

It’s up to her (and her OH if there is one). Plenty of grandparents end up caring for kids, some full time if needed. I wouldn’t fancy it but I found it hard twenty years younger.

JizzPigeon22 · 12/07/2020 19:06

Way too old

ComeOnEileen11 · 12/07/2020 19:08

Just because it's possible, doesn't mean she should. Definitely too old.

Sakura7 · 12/07/2020 19:09

It's not fair on the child. I say this as someone whose oldest parent was a couple of years younger than your friend when I was born.

I had to deal with dementia, cancer and death at a younger age than any of my friends. It's very isolating, especially to an only child (or child with much older siblings). There is also a huge cultural difference.

rubyslippers · 12/07/2020 19:09

I am 45
I have two kids and it’s rough / teen and tween and house full of hormones
It’s knackering etc etc
I wouldn’t in a billion years start at 46 / 47 years
BUT that’s me
It’s intensely personal decision and truly life changing

Waxonwaxoff0 · 12/07/2020 19:09

Well, it's possible, but no way would I do it.

somewomenneedaslap · 12/07/2020 19:09

To old.

LunaNorth · 12/07/2020 19:10

I wouldn’t fancy it, but I have no idea what kind of relationship set-up or support network your friend has.

Somethingorotherorother · 12/07/2020 19:10

Definitely too old. My aunt had one at 45 and then IVF twins at 47, she regrets it.

Divebar · 12/07/2020 19:11

Lots of women have babies in their 40s now so it’s not unusual. It depends on her and her energy levels I would have thought... is she pretty fit and well? She’ll be tired but she won’t have anything else to compare it against ( unlike people who have babies early and then go onto have more children later). Ultimately it’s her and her partners choice so you don’t need to “ think “ anything about it really

LunaNorth · 12/07/2020 19:11

@Somethingorotherorother

Definitely too old. My aunt had one at 45 and then IVF twins at 47, she regrets it.
Oof, that’s a bit harsh.
Divebar · 12/07/2020 19:12

I’m 50 by the way with an 8 year old and I feel fine. 🤷‍♀️

Iminaglasscaseofemotion · 12/07/2020 19:12

No far too old. It's possible, but she would be 60 when the child is 13. Very unfair on the child.

cptartapp · 12/07/2020 19:13

My 47 year old friend had twins last year. Her first set are 17!

Somethingorotherorother · 12/07/2020 19:13

@LunaNorth they all have additional needs, they are exhausting, her husband left and she's now 60 raising 3 incredibly difficult, destructive teens by herself.

NoWordForFluffy · 12/07/2020 19:13

@ComeOnEileen11

Just because it's possible, doesn't mean she should. Definitely too old.
This!
Sakura7 · 12/07/2020 19:13

Lots of women have babies in their 40s now so it’s not unusual.

Early 40s, sure. Late 40s is definitely unusual, and with good reason.

ivfdreaming · 12/07/2020 19:14

Far too old. Very selfish at that age

Pebblexox · 12/07/2020 19:14

Only your friend can make that decision. For me personally, I wouldn't want a baby at that age.
Babies are hard work, and tiring and I just can't imagine running around after them when I'm in my 40s. However I personally wanted children before 30, so it really is just a personal choice.

LunaNorth · 12/07/2020 19:14

@Somethingorotherorother that’s really sad. I hope things improve for them all.

Magictreegossip · 12/07/2020 19:15

Too old. Not fair to the child. Adoption is an option, maybe adoption an idea

Pebblexox · 12/07/2020 19:15

I also think people forget about the fact the child grows. Does she want to be dealing with a hormonal teenager when she's in her 60's? If so go for it.

transformandriseup · 12/07/2020 19:15

Several women in my family have had babies as late as early 40's but I think think any later is just too late.

user135664323455 · 12/07/2020 19:16

Talk us through what being a friend means to you.

suziedoozy · 12/07/2020 19:16

If she is fit and healthy I don’t see why not.

It also depends on whether she is financial secure enough to be able to pay for help eg cleaners / nursery etc to give her a break.

I had my first at 42 but seem to have the same level of tiredness as mum friends a decade younger but being more mature has been a benefit in terms of greater confidence in myself, less stressed and more money to make life easier.

But I’ve be able to pay for a cleaner / a few hours of care each week from when they were very small to have a break plus nursery for a few days each week even though I don’t really need it.

If she wants to I don’t see why not but I wouldn’t leave it much later.

Please create an account

To comment on this thread you need to create a Mumsnet account.

This thread is not accepting new messages.