Meet the Other Phone. Protection built in.

Meet the Other Phone.
Protection built in.

Buy now

Please or to access all these features

Work

Chat with other users about all things related to working life on our Work forum.

Mums forced into office by big UK company?

762 replies

MM90 · 16/07/2024 12:33

I work for a big, well-known company. The bosses are considering plans to force all colleagues to come to the office 3 days a week. They are thinking about checking our turnstile data individually and disciplining anyone who doesn’t come in for 3 days every week, whether they need to be there or not. I thought this was the 21st century where working women have the chance to create a sensible work / life balance so long as they perform in their job. My line manager gave me a great performance rating during Covid. I have two children under 5 and no family nearby. Any thoughts on this?

OP posts:
peeweemermaid · 16/07/2024 15:54

LIZS · 16/07/2024 12:39

And it could be discriminatory to make concessions for "mums" but not other employees.

It is discriminatory to make concessions for mums but not other employees

Gogogo12345 · 16/07/2024 15:55

housethatbuiltme · 16/07/2024 15:52

I disagree with the 'you shouldn't be looking after kids while working', as long as the work you are employed to do is done correctly and on time then it doesn't really matter what else you are multitasking with.

They are paying you to do the job, they have ZERO say over anything else in your life. If the job is done then you have no right to be penalized for your personal life.

Women in the past too kids to work. My Nana took all 5 of her kids to work and she died 10 years ago in her 90s. It wasn't deemed unusual at all for women to have young kids 'in tow' back in the day, it was just a given. Many men where away at war or working in mines etc... women need to make money too but someone had to watch the kids.

That was the reason some jobs specifically didn't allow mothers to be hired, but plenty of jobs allowed flexibility to mother to bring kids to work.

That's fair enough but not if the job is not getting done. As a PP stated I've had to call people and put up with noise of kids crying/arguing/interrupting while trying to discuss things ( and I struggle to hear on phone anyway) or even in one case a large dog barking it's head off

PregnantWithHorrors · 16/07/2024 15:55

IdeallySunnyPlease · 16/07/2024 15:45

No I don't see the logic in your point at all.

What exactly is the agenda and why?

Remote working is bad for print media, for obvious reasons. Circulations plummeted during lockdown because so many people used to buy a paper for the commute. This means they've an obvious self interest in more commuting.

Then also, the Tories made a lot of noises about getting people back to the office. It was always more nuanced than they liked to make out, because under their austerity programme they obliged a lot of public sector desk workers to go hybrid in the 2010s. Saved on premises costs (which is, incidentally, a big reason why the attempt to get them in the office more hasn't been fully implemented). But they did try and politicise the issue in their last couple of years of office. And you probably know that Murdoch is famously right wing?

gingercat02 · 16/07/2024 15:55

IdeallySunnyPlease · 16/07/2024 15:46

I can't help wonder what sort of work OP does if she has to check in through a turnstile.

I'm NHS, and we clock in and out every day using a biometric finger scan. Very normal to have some sort of time keeping system.

Thursdaygirl · 16/07/2024 15:55

Time to "force" them all back into offices, not just "mums".
The customer services (which were shit
when I moved here from another country 20 years ago) have suffered even more, it's beyond a joke.

But what's WFH got to do with good or bad customer service? I have the same phone and computer whether I'm at my desk or at home, I can be contacted in exactly the same way, and surely whether I'm efficient or not is down to ME, not down to where I'm sitting? I think people confuse the 2. A lot of places have reduced staff numbers so that's what causes poor customer services, they are simply stretched to thin, rather like HMRC.

WayTooManyTabsOpen · 16/07/2024 15:56

Plomant · 16/07/2024 15:44

Who said anything about WFH with 2 under 5’s?? No one. Read my post again.
WFH allows people (mothers) to work when they normally wouldn’t be able to, as they can get to their child care in time. You said yourself, your dd couldn’t find one that worked, had to look at 6. This is a problem for many. Mine are IN NURSERY and school whilst I wfh, and I finish at 5.15 for pick up. If I was in the office I wouldn’t be able to get back in time to do pick up. That’s the difference.

Women really can't win can we?

This thread is all for bunging the kids in nursery for 11 hours a day to accommodate long commutes and unnecessary days in the office, but on a different thread you'd get a barrage of 'why have kids if you're going to get someone else to look after them all the time?'

WindsurfingDreams · 16/07/2024 15:57

ClevererThanMost · 16/07/2024 15:52

It is in the hands of women though.

They’re the ones leaving their jobs or going part time.

Exactly. Surely if you are in a good relationship with your partner then you both agree to share the childcare burden?

Appreciate not everyone is, but yes, to me equality begins at home and DH does half the housework and half the childcare and our careers have equal priority

housethatbuiltme · 16/07/2024 15:57

GingerPirate · 16/07/2024 15:52

Time to "force" them all back into offices, not just "mums".
The customer services (which were shit
when I moved here from another country 20 years ago) have suffered even more, it's beyond a joke.
And no, I cannot go back to my country yet, because one of my (abusive) parents are still merrily sitting there, alive and kicking.

I have never heard someone use abusive parents as a reason to not be able to be in an entire country before.

If this ones so shit feel free to pick any of the 193 other ones in the world though.

ClevererThanMost · 16/07/2024 15:59

PregnantWithHorrors · 16/07/2024 15:48

Quite.

We live in a society where there are all kinds of very deeply ingrained reasons why a disproportionate share of caring labour falls on women. These cannot simply be opted out of, and nor do women as a class have the power to change them. Any kind of policy or argument that ignores this is going to be bad for women. The reality is that removal of access to flexibility is bad for us as a class, even if we'd rather it wasn't.

Fuck society then.

I found a partner who values my career as much as his. We’ve earned the same since pretty early in our relationship and have both climbed different ladders since. One factor in deciding to have DD was that I wouldn’t be going part time or being the default parent once breastfeeding was finished. DH worked away for the first 18 months and then decided he wouldn’t take any contracts requiring him to be away from home consistently.

I’ve worked on site or away from home for part of each week for about 7 years. He does all the parenting while I’m away. He did all the homeschooling during Covid.

Most men could be more engaged than they are. Women make it far too easy for them to carry on as they were without much responsibility. Women don’t have to do that.

ClevererThanMost · 16/07/2024 16:00

WindsurfingDreams · 16/07/2024 15:57

Exactly. Surely if you are in a good relationship with your partner then you both agree to share the childcare burden?

Appreciate not everyone is, but yes, to me equality begins at home and DH does half the housework and half the childcare and our careers have equal priority

See above.

Allie47 · 16/07/2024 16:01

LIZS · 16/07/2024 12:39

And it could be discriminatory to make concessions for "mums" but not other employees.

You wouldn't make it for mums though, the policy should be for parents and carers, it may benefit mums more as they tend to be primary caregivers though. Having said that of the 3 flex work requests I've handled in the past year, 1 was for a woman who had to handle childcare and 2 have been for men for the same reason which would have been unusual even as little as 10 years ago, some dads do seem to be stepping up more 🤷‍♀️

MidnightPatrol · 16/07/2024 16:02

A ‘work-life balance’ doesn’t necessarily meaning working from home full time.

Plomant · 16/07/2024 16:02

WayTooManyTabsOpen · 16/07/2024 15:56

Women really can't win can we?

This thread is all for bunging the kids in nursery for 11 hours a day to accommodate long commutes and unnecessary days in the office, but on a different thread you'd get a barrage of 'why have kids if you're going to get someone else to look after them all the time?'

No, something I was quite oblivious about until I had children. It’s so frustrating to see some of the responses on here though, so many still don’t get it.

Tulipvase · 16/07/2024 16:02

I don’t know what I think really. I work in a school and have done for years so have never worked from home. I kind of think that if you worked in an office pre covid, then you are lucky if you have managed to keep wfh. But then I do see the argument that if the job can be done wfh, then why make people go to the office.

I think it should be performance related. If you don’t quite work hard enough, get back in the office (until you improve or are sacked if it’s too bad). Don’t punish those who do manage to get the work done.

Reugny · 16/07/2024 16:04

WindsurfingDreams · 16/07/2024 15:43

It must be rubbish for the children too when their parents think that is ok.

I don't think my employer really minds whether I have my children at home or not, but I don't think it would be fair on them beyond the odd day here or there. They are in private school too so it's a long holiday to cover but I let them pick what kind of activity clubs they do, and then we intersperse these with family holidays and each parent taking them on days out (and the occasional day of them vegging at home while we work, or vegging at home while we hang out with them)

My DD is going to a different holiday club every week before she is on holiday for a week.

In theory she doesn't have to go in the middle of the week but 4 days often costs the same as 5 so there is no point. In addition 2 of the clubs are music and dance so she will miss out.

NerrSnerr · 16/07/2024 16:04

The attitudes on parenting need challenging. My friend's husband works in the same NHS organisation as me. He had a band 7 office job and as a family they fall over themselves to make sure he can work his hours and never has to take time off if the kids are sick etc. I have told my friend that his colleagues take carers leave and have flexible working so they can drop off at school etc (he doesn't even need this as the school drop off is done before the working day starts, I do exactly the same drop off myself) but as he's the man they fall over protecting his working hours. The women in the family (his wife and mother in law) make sure he doesn't get inconvenienced at all.

It must be happening all over the place and it's bloody depressing.

PregnantWithHorrors · 16/07/2024 16:05

ClevererThanMost · 16/07/2024 15:59

Fuck society then.

I found a partner who values my career as much as his. We’ve earned the same since pretty early in our relationship and have both climbed different ladders since. One factor in deciding to have DD was that I wouldn’t be going part time or being the default parent once breastfeeding was finished. DH worked away for the first 18 months and then decided he wouldn’t take any contracts requiring him to be away from home consistently.

I’ve worked on site or away from home for part of each week for about 7 years. He does all the parenting while I’m away. He did all the homeschooling during Covid.

Most men could be more engaged than they are. Women make it far too easy for them to carry on as they were without much responsibility. Women don’t have to do that.

This is a very privileged take. It's particularly interesting that you've not even considered women who don't have a partner at all, as if single mothers don't even exist. Maybe you think they can just opt out of societal sexism too. And you talk of careers, as if that covers all jobs.

Fwiw, my own DH went part time for years when our DC were little. Even got passed over for promotion as a consequence. But extrapolating from one's own privileged experience to tell women as a whole they can simply good choice their way out of the consequences of the wider sexist structure is never going to lead you to a sensible conclusion.

GingerPirate · 16/07/2024 16:06

housethatbuiltme · 16/07/2024 15:57

I have never heard someone use abusive parents as a reason to not be able to be in an entire country before.

If this ones so shit feel free to pick any of the 193 other ones in the world though.

Of course, sorry. 😂
I want their apartment.
And the other 190 countries are not of my interest.

Hillary17 · 16/07/2024 16:07

I’d be looking for a new job.

TeenLifeMum · 16/07/2024 16:08

We have 3 days in the office, one set day for the whole team. Last week, others who share the office were on teams calls and complained I was speaking to individuals in my team at their desks, chatting through their work informally, and asked me to use teams chat function and sit at my desk… I can do that from home. It’s like they’ve forgotten how to work in an office!!!

ClevererThanMost · 16/07/2024 16:09

PregnantWithHorrors · 16/07/2024 16:05

This is a very privileged take. It's particularly interesting that you've not even considered women who don't have a partner at all, as if single mothers don't even exist. Maybe you think they can just opt out of societal sexism too. And you talk of careers, as if that covers all jobs.

Fwiw, my own DH went part time for years when our DC were little. Even got passed over for promotion as a consequence. But extrapolating from one's own privileged experience to tell women as a whole they can simply good choice their way out of the consequences of the wider sexist structure is never going to lead you to a sensible conclusion.

So many women give up their names and jobs and everything else to bend over backwards for men. There are relatively few women having children without partners and the ones I know rely heavily on family and childcare to make things work. When relationships break down it shouldn’t be so easy for men to walk away and hardly see their children meaning mum can’t work while they maintain all of their freedoms and advantages.

we need a female uprising where women know their worth. We need to create villages around women who are truly doing it alone. But in the main choosing a partner that commits to sharing domestic responsibilities is key. Whatever early Disney films suggest.

SD1978 · 16/07/2024 16:09

If a company employed you for a hybrid role, and didnt specify the number of days in the office, then I dont see how they are to blame that you didn't consider future child care needs. Whilst WFH is convenient for you, they obviously have a minimum amount they want their employees in for. If you disagree you'd probably be best looking for a new role before it becomes mandatory. As others have said- you can always apply for consideration for more WFH time, but childcare may not be something they see as a good reason.

GeneralMusings · 16/07/2024 16:11

OP hasn't been back 🙄

WindsurfingDreams · 16/07/2024 16:11

PregnantWithHorrors · 16/07/2024 16:05

This is a very privileged take. It's particularly interesting that you've not even considered women who don't have a partner at all, as if single mothers don't even exist. Maybe you think they can just opt out of societal sexism too. And you talk of careers, as if that covers all jobs.

Fwiw, my own DH went part time for years when our DC were little. Even got passed over for promotion as a consequence. But extrapolating from one's own privileged experience to tell women as a whole they can simply good choice their way out of the consequences of the wider sexist structure is never going to lead you to a sensible conclusion.

I've been a mum in an abusive relationship and a single mum.

That's all the more reason why I believe equality at home is so important. It enables women to have financial independence and it also ensures that single parents are not hugely disadvantaged in their careers because men are just as likely to be doing a school run.

DH has still climbed the career ladder rapidly despite doing as many school runs as me.

This is a battle to fight on a household level too.

GeneralMusings · 16/07/2024 16:12

Journalist? Hence the "mums".

Column about mums having to go back into the office /Moaning about going into the office coming to you soon!