Former WPATH President Linked to Multiple Pro-Pedophilia Academics and Activists Over Several Decades, Previously Advocated for Sex Offender Rights

[UtopiaPlanitia]

https://reduxx.info/exclusive-former-wpath-president-linked-to-multiple-pro-pedophilia-academics-and-activists-over-several-decades-previously-advocated-for-sex-offender-rights/

Excerpt from Reduxx report:

Reduxx can reveal that a leading figure behind the World Professional Association for Transgender Health (WPATH), an organization which promotes the medical ‘transitioning’ of children, has a long history of working with pro-pedophile academics. Eli Coleman, a former WPATH president who oversaw and influenced the Standards of Care for transgender medical protocols for decades, has professional ties to multiple academics who either defended or advocated favorably for adult-child sexual relations, and had himself previously drafted Standards of Care for sex offenders.

…Coleman was an instrumental figure in the development of WPATH Standards of Care (SOC), specifically contributing to the three most recent iterations: the sixth, seventh, and eighth editions.

Significantly, Coleman served as the Chair and Lead Author for the development of the Standards of Care 8, which recommended the validation of a “eunuch gender identity”, and would later be revised to remove specific age limitations on the prescription of puberty-halting drugs to children.

This does not surprise me. So many men pushing to remove women's boundaries and transition children are child rapist sympathisers.

I'm also not surprised to read this, or that the Eunuch Archive has reared its rotten, twisted head again (in relation to this awful bloke and the so called standards of care).

Sadly, it doesn’t surprise me either but it worries and saddens me greatly that:

a) men with interests/backgrounds like this are involved in suggesting medical treatments for children and are taken seriously

b) that legacy/mainstream journalism is not interested in investigating this in a meaningful way. It would be very much in the public interest to make this information widely accessible but journalists seem to be deliberately ignoring it.

Even Shellenberger & Hughes of the WPATH Files investigative report didn’t tell the entire story (as documented on Reduxx) because they felt it would make mainstream journalism reluctant to publicise their findings.

Thank goodness for Reddux.

I'm struggling for words that wouldn't get me deleted.

Another one not in the least but surprised, revolted, but not surprised.

Paedophilia is evil, life-destroying violence. If this guy's harmed kids, I want the book thrown at him.

Whereas trans kids are just trans kids, and comparing all people who support them (like their parents) to paedophiles is utterly sick.

Weaponising the horror of child rape against those who defend and support vulnerable kids is every kind of wrong.

Paedophiles love to attack supportive parents of trans children. They call us "groomers" and claim to be saving children. The same way they used to picket police stations claiming to want to end FGM.

I am eternally suspicious of any man who says they are saving kids from something which is not real child abuse. And yes, that includes men who say they want to save trans kids.

You're missing the point. I don't know if this man has done anything wrong, but men who want to harm children often swarm charities and causes claiming to save them. Children In Need have a robust safeguarding policy against this, because it happens so often - execs have talked about it.

Think Jimmy Savile, in that regard.

That does not mean trans children are "groomed" into being trans or that being a trans child has anything to do with child abuse. That is a malicious lie - and to find its roots, look at the 'men are turned gay after being raped as children' myth which was so common until the early 20th century. It persists today, but is usually shouted down because of the wide acceptance that some people are just gay. Well, some people are just trans, too - and most knew it, unprompted, from an early age.

Paedophiles are hiding in plain sight in the anti-trans movement. They get to talk all day about kids ' genitals and breasts, and claim to be saviours. They're the ones who send parents like me their sick fantasies about girls showering with grown men (as if any parent allows their kids to shower naked or change clothes with adult strangers of any gender present). I see them all, and block them. There are plenty on this forum, and GC women need to be far more wary of them.

Anyway.

I'm not surprised that he wrote the standards of care for sex offenders, he developed the use of drugs to sterilise sex offenders in jail which he then took to 'trans', which is of course the underlying methodology of WPATH.

It's a feature not a bug as they say.

Horrible isn't it that none of us are surprised.

Odd how a thread exposing paedophilia links at WPATH is so promptly derailed with unspecified wild assertions. Plus ca change I suppose.

It's just so predictable. I ought to start placing bets!

The more we learn about the people involved in WPATH, the more revolted and vile the organisation becomes. It's clearly a vehicle for depraved men to produce a supply of taste treats for themselves, and normalise their aberrant behaviour, just like Michel Foucault wanted. I would hope that the reality of the sick people behind the movement would turn more and more people off.
There will, however, always be some who will be devoted to the shitfest until their dying day. Deny, Deny, Deny.

It’s hard to believe that people could be surprised that an organisation promoting the blocking of puberty in children might be interesting to people who are interested in sex with children.

Well, precisely.
I opened the thread thinking, 'Colour me surprised!'

The worst part is, I genuinely believed that when Reduxx revealed the origins of the Eunuch chapter, gender clinicians would vocally and vehemently distance themselves from it out of outrage and disgust. Instead there was….nothing.

Absolutely

There was a poster on here a few weeks ago who was telling us ‘gender affirming care’ is legit because is being practiced by the medical profession and had professional bodies like WPATH behind it.

Yet look at this.

If I remembered their name I would tag them.

It's Jimmy Saville all over again, yet at an even greater scale.

Where do people think all of the paedophiles went? And with the pervasiveness of internet pornography and Japanese cartoon cultures ( including Hentai) ever more younger men are getting drawn in. These days it is not just the old men in WPATH - it is young men in the late teens and twenties, often socially isolated and many neuro-divergent.

Yes, that section was quietly removed from health service literature and then the whole episode buried.

Yes - it's all "move along, nothing to see here". History and numerous investigations show this is not an adequate way of dealing with paedophiles.
Unfortunately too many of them are embedded in places where they can access children with everyone being too frit to call them out once they fly a certain flag.

It’s grim that perverts have managed to gain so much influence over the medical profession that an entirely made up concept (“trans kids”) has been normalised to the point where serious medical professionals don’t even question it.

Add me to the group of those who are completely unsurprised that yet another of these men has been revealed as a sick predator.

Most people don't want to acknowledege how prevalent, how devious, and how well organised paedophile networks are, and how they operate at all levels of society.

I've mentioned before how in the very early 1980's I was living in a large squat in the Elephant and Castle/Kennington district of London, and the PIE held a hastily arranged meeting in a downstairs room - which myself ( aged 17 and my gay male friend, age 16) sat in on. It was as bizarre and surreal experience - but i can say with knowledge and certainty that these men operate in all walks of life and most find ways of getting themselves involved with children, or with their paraphillic obsession, at one level or other. Police officers, judges, university professors, social workers, cub scout leaders, teachers.......

The depths of depravity that male people can sink to knows no bounds when they are led and then consumed by sexual paraphilia. And there are far more of these men than people want to realise. 'Queer' culture, the 'rainbow family' and the whole transgender movement has been a total boon to them.

And all of those gay men who at one point would want to have distanced themselves from accusations and associations with paedophilia ( such as Peter Tatchell) now feel emboldened.

and comparing all people who support them (like their parents) to paedophiles is utterly sick.

This thread is specifically about somebody who is in a position of authority.

men who want to harm children often swarm charities and causes claiming to save them.

Yes, this is why there is a need for safeguarding.

I see them all, and block them. There are plenty on this forum, and GC women need to be far more wary of them.

You can block people on MN?

Men like this are the Pied Pipers of the gender ideology establishment. No wonder some enthusiasts for the cause panic when this is shown to them and deflect like mad.

I hope someone's collecting all of your Ted talks into a book. Keep it coming.

Oh, and people who defend the concept of trans kids are walking, talking red flags

Same here - I can’t believe how strongly society (and journalists) want to avoid knowing about this linkage between the worst men in the world and gender identity.

I don’t know if it’s because people/media don’t want to believe it’s true or if it’s because they’d have to do something about it if they did believe it and they don’t want to do that 🤷‍♀️