Help end medical misogyny. Sign our petition.

Help end medical misogyny.
Sign our petition.

Sign the petition

Please or to access all these features

Feminism: Sex and gender discussions

Heartstopper Forever film TRA propaganda: "People don't want me using public bathrooms", "Government is taking away my rights"

110 replies

HelenaRavenclaw · 18/07/2026 06:42

The final instalment of Netflix's Heartstopper is here, and it's a film. The TRA propaganda is hardly unsurprising given that it's written by Alice Oseman the arch-TRA...but it's disgusting how these people are using a teen film to twist the truth and sensationalize things to get pity from the masses. "People don't want [trans people] to use public bathrooms": how convenient indeed to leave out the "intended for the opposite sex"! (Like saying "People don't want me to use money", leaving out the "stolen from others" part.) "Government is taking away my rights": what rights don't trans people have? (Does being poor give someone the right to simply grab other people's money without their consent? Doesn't the fact that laws exist and are enforced in society mean that the government is taking away rights from everyone, such as the right to break into one's neighbour's house, or the right to take home things from a store without paying?)

I hope that every sane adult whose children watch this film (and previous seasons of the show) will sit down with the kids and explain how deliberately deceptive and illogical the TRA propaganda is.

OP posts:
Ereshkigalangcleg · 20/07/2026 15:45

Try changing the url

ParsleySageToiletDuckAndBinBags · 20/07/2026 15:50

This reply has been hidden

This reply has been hidden until the MNHQ team can have a look at it.

Justme56 · 20/07/2026 15:57

I’ve seen the clip now. Managed to squeeze in that puberty blockers are no longer available into it too.

puyr · 20/07/2026 16:10

Justme56 · 20/07/2026 15:57

I’ve seen the clip now. Managed to squeeze in that puberty blockers are no longer available into it too.

without mentioning that blocking puberty is the worst form of child abuse and any parent who’s gone along with it for a quiet life, needs their head wobbling.

StandingDeskDisco · 20/07/2026 16:11

OneUniquePearlFish · 20/07/2026 09:56

Focusing on a few extreme protest signs and using them to judge an entire group is a textbook example of prejudice. Most trans people are just ordinary people trying to live their lives, working, spending time with family and friends, and dealing with the same everyday challenges as everyone else. They're not a single, monolithic group, and there's no good evidence that trans people as a whole pose a threat to women.

In fact, the evidence points in the opposite direction. Study after study has found that transgender people are far more likely than cisgender people to experience violence, harassment, and other forms of victimization. One nationally representative analysis of the U.S. National Crime Victimization Survey found that transgender people were victims of violent crime at about four times the rate of cisgender people. The UK's Office for National Statistics has also reported higher rates of crime victimization among transgender respondents, while noting that its gender identity data has only been collected since 2019 and is still relatively limited.

Claims that trans people are inherently more criminal often rely on a misunderstanding of a 2011 Swedish study. The study's lead author has repeatedly said her work has been misrepresented. She has explained that the research looked at a historical group of people living under very different social and legal conditions, and that it should not be used to argue that trans people are naturally more criminal or to draw conclusions about transgender people today.

There's nothing wrong with criticising violent or hateful rhetoric at protests. But judging an entire group by the words or actions of a small minority is neither fair nor supported by the evidence.

They're not a single, monolithic group
So do you advocate for separating out the overall category of 'transwomen' into separate groups? So for instance allowing those with diagnosed gender dysphoria or gender dysmorphia into women's spaces, but refusing access to the AGP's and the self-identified?
How would that work in practice?

there's no good evidence that trans people as a whole pose a threat to women
But some trans people are a threat to women, so until you can identify and separate out the bad ones, they all must stay out of women's spaces.
Back to first principles of safeguarding: all male people over age 8 are not allowed in women's spaces.

But judging an entire group by the words or actions of a small minority is neither fair nor supported by the evidence.
Totally agree. I don't judge all transwomen negatively, that would be prejudice.
But they all have to stay out of women's spaces. Because they are men.

PachacutiOfTheRPA · 20/07/2026 18:02

OneUniquePearlFish · 20/07/2026 10:43

Isla Bryson is a convicted criminal who was rightfully imprisoned. Do you honestly believe that all trans people are rapists? Focusing entirely on one bad person to paint an entire population as a threat is incredibly dishonest. Every demographic contains bad actors, but weaponising the actions of one terrible person to justify a blanket hostility toward an entire group is textbook prejudice.

Not all transwomen are rapists, but any rapist can say he's trans. And until recently that was enough to be given free access to women's spaces.

ScrollingLeaves · 20/07/2026 18:35

StandingDeskDisco · 20/07/2026 16:11

They're not a single, monolithic group
So do you advocate for separating out the overall category of 'transwomen' into separate groups? So for instance allowing those with diagnosed gender dysphoria or gender dysmorphia into women's spaces, but refusing access to the AGP's and the self-identified?
How would that work in practice?

there's no good evidence that trans people as a whole pose a threat to women
But some trans people are a threat to women, so until you can identify and separate out the bad ones, they all must stay out of women's spaces.
Back to first principles of safeguarding: all male people over age 8 are not allowed in women's spaces.

But judging an entire group by the words or actions of a small minority is neither fair nor supported by the evidence.
Totally agree. I don't judge all transwomen negatively, that would be prejudice.
But they all have to stay out of women's spaces. Because they are men.

Like all other males, the majority of whom are good men who would never harm anyone.

TakingMyChancesWithTheRabbits · 21/07/2026 04:01

NotBadConsidering · 20/07/2026 12:30

It’s just bad telly, if you’re happy for “LGBT+ youth” to be represented by such average quality, good for you.

Personally, it was like watching a dumbed down version of Hollyoaks for over an hour.

Given that Hollyoaks always felt like a dumbed down version of Brookside, that's really not a good sign.

MarieDeGournay · 21/07/2026 14:49

OneUniquePearlFish They're [transpeople] not a single, monolithic group, and there's no good evidence that trans people as a whole pose a threat to women.

I disagree. Going beyond the anecdotal ' just ordinary people trying to live their lives, working, spending time with family and friends, and dealing with the same everyday challenges as everyone else, trans people do form a a single group in that they believe, against all serious scientific consensus, that human sex is not immutable and is not binary, and/or that there is something inherent called 'gender' which is more important than biological sex.

That is a threat not just to women, because it undermines our identity as a specific social group, but it also undermines a fact-based system which relies on empirical evidence and peer-review and objectivity and ethics and all that jazz..

Future generations of sociologists will have a field-day trying to work out how the unsupported, unprovable minority opinions of such a tiny percentage of the population have gained disproportionate influence in so many society parts of society - media, medicine, law, education, language..

The word 'threat' can mean more than the threat of physical harm. There's plenty of evidence of other kinds of harm.

SinnerBoy · Yesterday 05:24

Yes, sorry - transcrime.co.uk

Sodding autocarrot...

New posts on this thread. Refresh page