Rowling Makes a Stand

[JadeLeader]

Ok, so I know the educated classes hate us and our Dear Leader, but she's really not doing herself any favours here...

Not in other countries such as Norway and Sweden.

I'm guessing that's a self-portrait.

Yes the but are strictly regulated and restricted to tightly controlled investigational treatment pathways.

😂😂

So she claimed a simile to Stalingrad but wants the outcome to be different? 😂🤡

Err no. She claimed a simile but didn't understand the context of the simile which made her look like a …..fool.

Er…no. She claimed a simile where she pointed out turning back WPATH would be a major turning point, just like repelling the Nazis was at Stalingrad, and you claimed the opposite which make you look like a…fool.

Duh. That she AND you failed to understand the full context (& irony) of Stalingrad by using that simile & continued to deny it even when finding out is chef's kiss!

Then please enlighten us: what is the "full context (& irony) of Stalingrad" ?

Double down, triple down, quadruple down. You’re not convincing anyone 😂😂

Explain it again then, for everyone’s amusement.

JKR said “taking down WPATH would be the gender critical Battle of Stalingrad”.

JKR means, obviously, that beating WPATH would be the equivalent of winning the Battle of Stalingrad. Because it’s not like she’s hoping to lose, is she?

Who lost the Battle of Stalingrad? The Nazis. So clearly she isn’t advocating for that, is she? She’s advocating for being the side that came out victorious after a relentless onslaught of gender ideology Nazi attacks.

The only way to deliberately misinterpret this is if you believe JKR wants an alternative history to prevail in which the Nazis won. The only way to do this is if you’ve decided JKR is a Nazi already, then apply this idiotic logic to her tweet.

It’s laughably pathetic. You’re either incredibly dim, or malevolent. There’s no alternative explanation.

I’m going for the former 😂😂

You’re either incredibly dim, or malevolent.

Por qué no los dos? I vote it's both, considering how hatred is so visibly pouring off them.

"JKR means, obviously, that beating WPATH would be the equivalent of winning the Battle of Stalingrad. Because it’s not like she’s hoping to lose, is she?"

Again, duh. We know what she meant. The point is she didn't know the battle details that positioned her 'side' as the aggressor arrogant anti queer Nazis whose monumental hubris was their downfall. There's this thing called 'irony' & as has already been covered on page 1 of this thread, the irony of her using Stalingrad was lost on her despite her intentions otherwise.

And to add to her stunning hubris & grandiosity as already covered upthread, she mistakenly assumes that temporarily pressuring governments to slow down the implementation of ideas kills them when in actual fact governments come & go & are at the mercy of the younger generations who are more trans friendly.

"You can kill a man but you can't kill an idea" & "winning a battle isn't the same as winning a war" come to mind.

Are you really this much in denial or just slow?

As someone who had relatives on the winning side in the Stalingrad campaign, I understood her point.

The point is she didn't know the battle details that positioned her 'side' as the aggressor arrogant anti queer Nazis whose monumental hubris was their downfall.

Again, please enlighten us about those details, since obviously we don't know them. You can't want to educate us, and then not educate us when we beg you to, can you?

"The point is she didn't know the battle details that positioned her 'side' as the aggressor arrogant anti queer Nazis whose monumental hubris was their downfall."

The point is she didn't know the battle details that positioned her 'side' as the aggressor arrogant anti queer Nazis whose monumental hubris was their downfall.

Why on earth do you think she “positioned her side” as the aggressor, not the defender?! 😂

That’s just a silly inference isn’t it? Just seeing what you want to see. This is only happening inside your head. HTH.

Obviously she sees herself as a victim. We are talking about what she actually is in "taking down" (her words) an established respected global medical entity without any authority as an invader would.

Okay, so it makes sense now, it IS just your silly inference. You have interpreted “taking down WPATH” to mean “taking down Stalingrad”. What a silly sausage you are!

Taking down WPATH would be like taking down the Nazis trying to claim Stalingrad. That’s obviously what she meant. The fact you’ve put a great deal of stock into the words “taking down” is quite hilarious.

Oh, and WPATH is very far from “an established respected global medical entity”. They are not respected at all. They are an established global lobbying group.

Do you respect WPATH? Do you respect their chapter on Eunuch identity and its collaboration with a CSA fetish website?

I mean “JKR said ‘taking down’ ergo she’s a Nazi” Is a hell of a take, but you went there 😵‍💫

Taking down WPATH would be like taking down the Nazis trying to claim Stalingrad.

Again Duh. We know that in her head she fantasised she was the 'the good guy' in the Stalingrad scenario on the road to victory.

But again the reality is she is attempting to claim territory she has no authority to like the Nazis. Her own government's systemic review Cass supports PB trials as do all other European/Scandinavian countries that have conducted systemic reviews that aren't WPATH related & yet she thinks she knows better.

The fact you can't accept your lack of authority or expertise on this issue is probably why you can't comprehend how the aggressor & defender dynamic works in war & this scenario. The Nazis like GC ideology had no authority to invade & as such are the aggressors.

But again the reality is she is attempting to claim territory she has no authority to like the Nazis.

This sentence makes no sense grammatically, even when you put “no authority” in bold. Can you rephrase to readable English please?

So now your take is “she doesn’t have authority to criticise WPATH, the Nazis didn’t have authority to take Stalingrad, ergo she’s a Nazi”?

It gets wilder and wilder 😵‍💫

Do you genuinely believe WPATH is untouchable? 😵‍💫😵‍💫

But again the reality is she is attempting to claim territory she has no authority to like the Nazis.

Quite the contrary: the territory she's trying to protect, not reclaim, is - as it's always been - women's rights. WPATH is trying to bulldoze over women's rights just like the Nazis were trying to bulldoze over Europe, and WPATH's downfall would be like the Nazis' defeat in Stalingrad.

Your mistake, as always, is that you're terminally self-centered, so you can't even conceive of the fact that she might not be after you at all, that her battle might not be about taking down trans rights, but about protecting women's rights. There's a massive difference between those two stances, and you are completely blind to it. Your problem, not ours.

TRAs are on the side of nazis. With their silencing of people, their medical experiments on children. WPATH/Nazis were defeated by the good people which is our side. WPATH is the nazis. And they lost.

Oh for goodness sake, are you still at it? Please, move on. Your stance is just plain daft. And the discussion about celery was far more sensible. Women will not surrender their rights, just like the Russians would not surrender Stalingrad. And celery is great in spag bol.

“Terminally self-centred”

Perfect!