Thank you for your thoughtful reply.
For example, the Pope speaks the word of God and the Bible (any translation) is unequivocal about following Jesus and his teachings, so I'm not sure it's that different in the grand scheme of things.
What I am looking for in a report on any failure such as this is:
A recognition of what happened to the victims (I think the report is successful here)
An examination, agency by agency, of what went wrong and why from the perspectives of victims and those working within them and what may prevent the failings from being repeated (largely absent)
A set of recommendations that distils all the evidence (those offered may be flawed and incomplete because the second part is lacking)
Lastly, to deliver successful lasting change and prevent as many future victims as possible, a cross party or politically independent panel/authorship is best. This report doesn't have that and, even within his own part of the political spectrum, RL is divisive as the repeated spats between himself and Reform demonstrate.