Actually on the Dutch model, and The Netherlands has one of the very best health service in the world, I'd certainly vote for that. The NHS is dysfunctional, the way it is managed and incentivised leads to worse outcomes than we could have with a very different approach.
Bit of info on how the Dutch do it -
The Dutch system combines universal healthcare with regulated competition, rather than requiring the state to own and manage most healthcare services directly. Everyone must purchase a standard insurance policy from a competing insurer, but the government defines the essential care that every policy must cover. Insurers must accept every applicant regardless of age, health or medical history, and receive additional risk-adjusted funding for patients who are likely to require more expensive care. Low-income households receive financial support, children are covered without premiums, and everyone retains access to the same core package. People who want additional services or greater flexibility can pay for supplementary insurance.
Unlike the NHS, where patients are often tied to their local provider and poorly managed organisations can continue receiving public funding despite long waits or poor service, Dutch insurers contract with independent hospitals and clinics and negotiate over price, capacity and quality. Patients can choose between insurers and providers, while insurers can direct business away from inefficient or consistently poor-performing services. This does not magically eliminate mismanagement, but it makes it harder for dysfunction to continue without financial consequences and gives successful providers an incentive to expand.
The result is a system that maintains almost universal access while generally delivering greater patient choice and better access than the UK. OECD figures show that the Netherlands performs above the OECD average on nine out of ten measures of access and quality, compared with six out of ten for the UK. Only 0.6% of Dutch people reported unmet healthcare needs, compared with 4.5% in the UK, while satisfaction with the availability of quality healthcare was 83% in the Netherlands and 61% in the UK. Dutch mortality following heart attacks and strokes was also substantially lower. These differences cannot be attributed solely to competition, particularly because the Netherlands spends more on healthcare, but they demonstrate that universal coverage does not require an NHS-style state monopoly.