From having read the Particulars, it's clear Lisa was pushing for a bilateral orchidectomy even when told that a procedure such as a cord block was standard for testicular pain and orchidectomies only done in severe cases, such as cancer or extreme pain. He did have cord blocks but then claimed they didn't resolve the pain, even though prior to the procedure his pain was not extreme, usually at the level of three out of ten (more energy he was tucking).
The whole paragraph that seems to explain the reasons given as to why the orchidectomy surgery was apparently cancelled is redacted.
The waiting time between the cord block and the supposed date of the orchidectomy was only about two months, incredibly little time for Lisa to have recovered from the cord blocks and seen to what extent they worked, to be re-examined and accepted for a bilateral orchidectomy and then to be given a date.
Seems like Lisa had always been pushing for a bilateral orchidectomy, even though he was told such procedures are used in rare circumstances, usually life threatening, and his pain level was not severe. After the supposedly "failed" cord block procedures, the doctors must have realised that Lisa wanted the orchidectomy not for pain management reasons but for psychological reasons.