PPW, I'm going to try a slightly different tack here.
I know GPs who have treated people who are, likely, in a similar position to you (obviously just brief and anonymous references to lifelong transexuals by intelligent professionals for whom I have deep respect). They always emphasise that such patients are a vanishingly small, even "once-in-a-career", minority, and express their concern for the challenges they face. I shared their concern then, and I still share this concern now. I wondered what it must be like then, and I still do now. I wondered how society could be changed to support such people, and I still do now.
In becoming gender critical, I haven't been "captured" by some niche ideology, or radicalised by Mumsnet, or whatever else. My views are much as they always were, really: I've always believed in empathetic accommodation of such individuals where possible.
But the political landscape around me has changed, and I've read widely on both sides of this debate and engaged in hour upon hour of conversations with, (hopefully) good-faith visitors like yourself. And as a result of this - of external forces and influences - my previously expansive "where possible" has been squeezed, brutally, into a regrettable fragment of what it was before. It no longer feels possible to me to give you what you want, because it asks too much - not just of me, but of women the world over; and because it takes too much - from research, from infrastructure, I'd even argue from your own demographic (and others who don't belong to it, but are swept up in it). From a personal but also a ruthlessly utilitarian, an ethical, and even a holistically empathetic perspective - all those - I just can't.
I notice that you've still not addressed my earlier monster-post, and several since, about the wider implications (again, the political, ethical and practical - on an historical and global scale) of leaving adult human females without a word of their own.
In my own posts on this, I've cited women's history - our clarity, continuity and ownership. I've examine the ongoing global oppression of women, with specific reference to the women in Afghanistan, with anecdotal evidence of what's at stake. The fact that women continue to be injured and die in their tens of thousands right here, in the UK, because of their ongoing invisibility in medicine and health and safety - before we even get to pregnancy and childbirth. Women's frighteningly recent acquisition of a political identity and voice, in the vote. Women's terrifyingly recent acquisition of physical autonomy in marriage - marital rape. The corruption of research studies seeking to mitigate physical harm to women by the shift in meaning of that word.
Other women on this thread have mentioned the slippery slope argument, referencing the now undeniable exploitation of our redefinition by AGPs and other dangerous males.
And behind all this has been a litany of shared experiences of individual women's trauma.
Prisons. Sports. The crippling terror of the women with PTSD in the toilet they thought was single sex. The life-changing disillusionment of the girls training 15 hours a week only to lose to a male. We all have our stories, and could fill at least as many posts with them as you have with your own. They're just as valid. And they're legion.
Are you really, truly arguing that, in all of the above - as you appeared to suggest in an earlier response to me - that "women" should be replaced by "adult human female"? Or that from now - the early 21st century - and forever after, any and all readers will somehow be able to recognise when accounts like all of mine above refer only to one "type" of women, and when it includes the other? That we should assume they will? That this is good enough for women?
I don't yet see from your posts how your determination to use our word is anything but what posters here are suggesting: a matter of urgent personal imperative. And if it is, please note: such deep-seated need is worth our empathy, and thought - and accommodation in wider society. But as long as posts like your own here also demonstrate a corresponding blindness to women's need in turn - on a personal, and political; historical and global scale; in our billions - they also demonstrate how dangerous it is for us to concede one inch in this matter at this time, even if we wish to do so. And, in this way, this movement's resistance to ceding women so much as a word of their own is harming you and your own - fatal flaw, Greek tragedy, it's all right here in this story.
Do you have arguments beyond the personal, that address these wider issues?