Help protect children from gaming harms.

Take our survey

Please or to access all these features

Feminism: Sex and gender discussions

GCSE pupils taught toilets provided by biological sex is discrimination - according to new GCSE Revision book.

33 replies

SingleSexSpacesInSchools · 08/05/2026 11:36

https://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/2026/05/06/gcse-pupils-taught-its-their-civic-duty-not-to-offend/?mc_cid=6392355406&mc_eid=15dd08d58f

https://archive.ph/lY7YY

"The textbook also states that it is “discrimination” to provide lavatories only for men and women and that “human rights come ahead of the right of a country to conduct its own affairs”.
As examples of discrimination, it includes “gender reassignment discrimination, eg toilets provided only for men or women”."

https://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/2026/05/06/gcse-pupils-taught-its-their-civic-duty-not-to-offend?mc_cid=6392355406&mc_eid=15dd08d58f

OP posts:
TheSmallAssassin · 09/05/2026 23:30

I think it is discriminatory if you don't have some unisex provision, if we are going to say that with single sex toilets transmen have to use the female toilets and transwomen have to use male toilets, everybody should be able to use the toilet with dignity.

POWNewcastleEastWallsend · 10/05/2026 02:24

Yes, "dignity" is a very important consideration. Nothing undignified at all about these individuals accessing female-only spaces but heaven forfend they should suffer the indignity of having to use male-only spaces.

https://www.mumsnet.com/talk/womens_rights/5521856-5521856-biggus-titus-of-oxford-university

GCSE pupils taught toilets provided by biological sex is discrimination - according to new GCSE Revision book.
GCSE pupils taught toilets provided by biological sex is discrimination - according to new GCSE Revision book.
GCSE pupils taught toilets provided by biological sex is discrimination - according to new GCSE Revision book.
GCSE pupils taught toilets provided by biological sex is discrimination - according to new GCSE Revision book.
Keeptoiletssafe · 10/05/2026 08:25

TheSmallAssassin · 09/05/2026 23:30

I think it is discriminatory if you don't have some unisex provision, if we are going to say that with single sex toilets transmen have to use the female toilets and transwomen have to use male toilets, everybody should be able to use the toilet with dignity.

The problem being unisex provision is always going to be inferior to single sex provision in terms of health and safety, because the design is completely private.

ExtraordinaryMachine1 · 11/05/2026 14:55

I just had a depressing thought. Normally, I buy (and recommend) secondhand books in order to pre-date this ideology. But this textbook is the secondhand book of tomorrow, isn't it? This book is going to be on charity shop shelves in the next few months or so and will stay there for years.😔

ScrollingLeaves · 11/05/2026 15:23

ExtraordinaryMachine1 · 11/05/2026 14:55

I just had a depressing thought. Normally, I buy (and recommend) secondhand books in order to pre-date this ideology. But this textbook is the secondhand book of tomorrow, isn't it? This book is going to be on charity shop shelves in the next few months or so and will stay there for years.😔

Unless action is taken to make transactivism on children illegal, and they are all too weak to do this, it is going to go on and on. It is in all sorts of books.

OpheliaWitchoftheWoods · 12/05/2026 10:42

This reply has been withdrawn

This has been withdrawn by MNHQ at the poster's request.

PollyNomial · 13/05/2026 10:08

Current GCSE pupils will have started on their syllabus 2 years ago and that will have been written at least 1-2 years ahead of that (so 2022-23).

It's very likely not to be the last syllabus that isn't reflecting the fws judgement. The syllabus will get there but for obvious reasons, the children, parents and teachers aren't fans of a syllabus changing while studying it.

MrsOvertonsWindow · 13/05/2026 10:53

PollyNomial · 13/05/2026 10:08

Current GCSE pupils will have started on their syllabus 2 years ago and that will have been written at least 1-2 years ahead of that (so 2022-23).

It's very likely not to be the last syllabus that isn't reflecting the fws judgement. The syllabus will get there but for obvious reasons, the children, parents and teachers aren't fans of a syllabus changing while studying it.

Children, parents and teachers also aren't very keen on legally incorrect materials or transactivists pushing their niche anti social beliefs at other people's children via exam boards.

Can't imagine why 🙄

New posts on this thread. Refresh page
Swipe left for the next trending thread