Meet the Other Phone. Protection built in.

Meet the Other Phone.
Protection built in.

Buy now

Please or to access all these features

Feminism: Sex and gender discussions

Good Law Project are now selling "JK Rowlling is a transphobe" stickers

201 replies

BambooLampshade · 30/04/2026 14:55

I think this is really poor. It seems to go well beyond their original remit.
They seem to have turned themselves into a ranty uni-soc type of outfit.

I wonder how JKR will respond, if she does.

https://goodlawproject.org/product/jk-rowling-is-a-transphobe-stickers/

‘JK Rowling is a Transphobe’ stickers | Good Law Project

Get your stickers.

https://goodlawproject.org/product/jk-rowling-is-a-transphobe-stickers/

OP posts:
Thread gallery
11
WhatterySquash · 03/05/2026 21:04

FlirtsWithRhinos · 03/05/2026 20:14

Do they really need to go more frequently, or do they just not feel they have to hold it like women have to?

I am reminded of an old joke...

Q: "Why do dogs lick their own balls?"
A: "Because they can"

Edited

To be fair I think a lot of older men genuinely do need to go a lot.

FlirtsWithRhinos · 03/05/2026 21:25

WhatterySquash · 03/05/2026 21:04

To be fair I think a lot of older men genuinely do need to go a lot.

They do - but they aren't usually the ones pissing in the street.

Datun · 03/05/2026 22:11

FlirtsWithRhinos · 03/05/2026 21:25

They do - but they aren't usually the ones pissing in the street.

Ha! True.

SidewaysOtter · 03/05/2026 22:23

DontStopMe · 03/05/2026 11:05

Some deflectors in London

https://londonist.com/london/secret/urine-deflectors

I believe you can also get paint that has a similar effect.

I’ve seen these and always wondered what they were! Thanks ☺️

Hedgehogforshort · 03/05/2026 22:23

My DH needs to Pee far more often than he used to, but his doesn't just piss anywhere.

mind he does piss me off far more than he used too.

WittyLimeBiscuit · 04/05/2026 06:56

BambooLampshade · 30/04/2026 14:55

I think this is really poor. It seems to go well beyond their original remit.
They seem to have turned themselves into a ranty uni-soc type of outfit.

I wonder how JKR will respond, if she does.

https://goodlawproject.org/product/jk-rowling-is-a-transphobe-stickers/

The fundraising for lost causes grift is drying up, they need a new one

MarieDeGournay · 04/05/2026 10:28

I've been researching the distinctive Harry Potter font used in these stickers, I found an interesting website:
Harry Potter font: where to find and how to use

The original logo was created by Mary GrandPré, the illustrator behind the U.S. editions of the books. She used hand-drawn letters inspired by medieval calligraphy, giving the title a timeless and enchanted look. The lightning bolt incorporated into the “P” symbolized Harry’s famous scar soon became inseparable from the franchise itself.
...
However, the typeface was never officially released as a font, meaning it was custom lettering, not a standard typeface file. Fans and designers later created digital replicas so that anyone could cast a bit of wizardry into their own projects.

It looks like the downloadable replica fonts have the usual 'free for personal use' clause - is making stickers 'personal use'? Possibly, I don't know.

However, I can imagine the holders of media rights not being very happy that a typeface 'inseparable from the franchise itself' is being used in the negative word 'transphobic', which is being used in reference to the holder of the literary and creative rights.

Thin ice, I think.

thirdfiddle · 04/05/2026 11:29

Making stickers and selling them is definitely not personal use.

JKR and Warner typically give a fair amount of leeway to fans doing things that will help promote their brand. This is not that. More a question of whether he's worth the trouble. Though could be funny - JM bigs up his court case with JKR and Warner's junior copyright lawyer's deputy's nanny turns up.

BambooLampshade · 04/05/2026 12:23

WittyLimeBiscuit · 04/05/2026 06:56

The fundraising for lost causes grift is drying up, they need a new one

The thing is, they'r enever going to grift much from this tedious stunt, and they know that.

It's all about publicity, trying to keep up their activisit image with the troons, and hoping to get some attention from JKR.

Honestly, it's like a toddler saying "I didn't eat the biscuit!" when their mouth is covered with chocolate. Completely transparent.

OP posts:
sanctuaryy · 04/05/2026 12:44

Igmum · 02/05/2026 20:37

Bet they’re printed by his daughter and her mates on the home office printer. This reeks of teenager thinks it’s a good idea vibes.

I had exactly the same thought.

The "Never had to deal with any real world problems" teenager written all over it.

MyAmpleSheep · 04/05/2026 12:49

thirdfiddle · 04/05/2026 11:29

Making stickers and selling them is definitely not personal use.

JKR and Warner typically give a fair amount of leeway to fans doing things that will help promote their brand. This is not that. More a question of whether he's worth the trouble. Though could be funny - JM bigs up his court case with JKR and Warner's junior copyright lawyer's deputy's nanny turns up.

is the font registered as a trade mark?

Trade mark law is such that if you fail to protect your mark you can quickly lose it. If it were I think cease-and-desist letters would already have been sent.

Copyright law is different.

DontStopMe · 04/05/2026 12:55

Thanks, MyAmpleSheep. I had a vague recollection of there being something like that, maybe related to the McDonalds case.

DontStopMe · 04/05/2026 13:00

I'm sure the combination of JK Rowling's lawyers and Warner Brothers' lawyers will be able to handle whatever they need to do.

Llamasarellovely · 04/05/2026 13:02

There's a bit in Dorothy L Sayers' Gaudy Night where Harriet squishes Lord St George (who is being outrageous basically to get a rise out of her) using what was apparently a classic put down from a Brasenose porter along the lines of "It's no use you making a noise, the Dean ain't coming down tonight".
Essentially, even though you're begging for attention, I'm not going to rise to the bait.
For some reason that's been in my head since I saw this. Can't think why.

thirdfiddle · 04/05/2026 13:27

Love that book llamas. Despite the male hero eventually turning up so much of it passes the bechdel test. And fascinating insight into oxford culture at the time.

MarieDeGournay · 04/05/2026 13:58

MyAmpleSheep · 04/05/2026 12:49

is the font registered as a trade mark?

Trade mark law is such that if you fail to protect your mark you can quickly lose it. If it were I think cease-and-desist letters would already have been sent.

Copyright law is different.

It was never released as a font, and so there are lots of looky-likeys which are perfectly legal - but have 'personal use' clauses.

It's probably unlikely that Warner Bros et al will do anything about it, but the use of such iconic lettering in such a negative way just might rattle somebody's cage..

Keeptoiletssafe · 04/05/2026 14:32

I am raising to the bait. Apologies. I can’t get over how he raised £500k to try and get rid of single sex toilets. I am doing this out of the free goodness of my own heart!

In my more charitable ‘why is he doing this?’ moments, trying to understand his misguided obsession with ‘gender neutral’ toilets, I wondered if Jolyon has a more personal reason.

With my research I have been looking at who wants what, and what happens when they get it.

So, for gender neutral toilets: It’s young women who tend to want them. Particularly those identifying as non binary. They do not want to be in the ladies or the men’s. It is rare to come across a woman who really prefers to use the men’s. But men, particularly older men, who don’t want to be in the men’s, also don’t want to be in gender neutral. They want to be in the women’s toilets.

So then we have the parents. I haven’t got much information on any demographic other than the parents of younger women, who campaign for gender neutral toilets for their offspring. They don’t want their children in the men’s.

This fits in with Jolyon, wanting to do the best for his family.

BUT when gender neutral toilets are in place Jolyon needs to know the next bit for people who don’t want to be in the toilet for their sex. The men don’t like them - they want to be in the women’s (this is where his moan about disabled toilets comes from). The women don’t like them because they smell, they are dirtier and they feel uncomfortable and sometimes scared (this is where his basement comment also comes in) but try and put up with it for the validation of not being in female toilets. If you are in a private, sound resistant, mixed sex design, it doesn’t matter if it’s in a basement or a busy station, you are isolated in that space. It takes a lot of courage to admit it’s a mistake, but many of the women go back to using women’s toilets as they grow up (in age and experience). The privacy of the gender neutral toilets is a target for men who want a ‘sit down’, and people who want to use misuse toilets for other things than excretion. The women don’t like men using their gender neutral toilets for this.

‘Basements’ feature a lot in feelings about toilets and changing rooms. It’s short-hand for isolation. Sandy Peggie, the pending case with the NHS, Jolyon’s musings all mention basements. Everyone should want to avoid isolating vulnerable people. That’s why the traditional unisex toilet in a school is usually designed to be in the most obviously watched place - by reception.

So, as I said before, he’s got two demographics that he’s trying to please that have sexed-based responses. What he needs to do is think it through for his children and his wife if they are in a vulnerable situation or less salubrious surroundings. Even basements. Think about health and safety rather than validation. Then he needs to stop reinventing toilets, wasting time and money on trying to make all toilets mixed sex.

If he’s got some spare change I could do with some. I am a David to his Goliath. But this Dave has a lot of loo knowledge in her sling.

BiologicalRobot · 04/05/2026 15:08

Can we stop with the gender neutral term and just say what it really means please. Mixed sex.

There are too still too many people who think TW are biological women pretending to be men or not realising gender neutral isn't individual cubicles because the language isn't clear anymore. But everyone understands the words mixed sex.

Sorry, just my pet peeve.

Keeptoiletssafe · 04/05/2026 16:55

BiologicalRobot · 04/05/2026 15:08

Can we stop with the gender neutral term and just say what it really means please. Mixed sex.

There are too still too many people who think TW are biological women pretending to be men or not realising gender neutral isn't individual cubicles because the language isn't clear anymore. But everyone understands the words mixed sex.

Sorry, just my pet peeve.

I agree. I was putting it into the language used by the girls and young women and Jolyon. It can mean so many different variations of designs. But all mixed sex. In ‘inclusive’ (!) design, it often means private full height partitioned cubicles that men and or women can use and then shared mixed sex hand basins. This, I believe, is Robin Moira White’s preferred choice. It’s one of the most dangerous options.

Gender neutral has no regulated design - it’s not a term used in legislation or regulation. It made a brief appearance for a few years in Department of Education design guidelines and this year has disappeared! No mention of gender in design. It was daft - the guidance had a unisex toilet by reception and a recommendation for a gender neutral toilet on every floor.

A unisex toilet follows the universal design. It is private and resistant to sound. Toilet facilities provided in a fully enclosed room which contains a water-closet and washbasin and hand-drying facilities, and is intended for individual use by persons of either sex. It is the design required by the 1992 Health and Safety legislation for a toilet used by both sexes, and for building regs and British Standards.

That’s the design Jolyon wants in schools, ironically in his submission for Keeping Children Safe in Education. In design terms, ‘facilities’ means sinks, toilets and hand dryer:
Contrary to how the guidance is framed, schools are under no obligation to provide any single-sex facilities whatsoever. It would be entirely lawful and legitimate for a school to provide toilet and changing facilities entirely in self-enclosed lockable rooms, designed for use by one pupil at a time. Indeed, where this is practicable, this may be the most sophisticated way of addressing the needs of all pupils. The guidance should make this clear.’

He’s wrong, of course. Forget about the legislation, regulations, guidance, loss of the amount of provision, safety and health, has he any idea how much that ‘sophisticated’ way would cost schools? He’s out of touch.

This is a quote from a pupil using a Jolyon preferred toilet design- from someone who was really keen to use a ‘gender neutral’ (their words) rather than single sex design:
I consider everything in the third floor bathroom a biohazard. Almost every time I make the mistake of going in, I leave trying to purge my mind of the horrors I just witnessed. Whether it is people having sex, poop smeared on the walls, or the toilet being clogged with an entire roll of toilet paper, horrible things have happened in that bathroom’.

Vaping and drugs were specialities on the other floors.

Jolyon, meet reality.

BiologicalRobot · 05/05/2026 09:39

I'm so sorry KTS, I'd reached my limit and it just so happened to be your post that set me off. Please know that I really appreciate all you are doing, your time, your energy, everything, in your quest (? brain fart) for keeping us all that little bit safer, whether against men or medical episodes. You absolutely rock ❤

Keeptoiletssafe · 05/05/2026 10:00

BiologicalRobot · 05/05/2026 09:39

I'm so sorry KTS, I'd reached my limit and it just so happened to be your post that set me off. Please know that I really appreciate all you are doing, your time, your energy, everything, in your quest (? brain fart) for keeping us all that little bit safer, whether against men or medical episodes. You absolutely rock ❤

oh don’t apologise - gender neutral term annoys me too because it’s a nonsense - it’s not a regulated, defined design. There are so many toilets out there that don’t meet regulations.

As you say, the factual term they can be defined as is mixed sex.

I was trying to shorten a lot of research and I didn’t explain that I was phrasing it how it was written in the articles and podcasts etc I have watched. People don’t campaign for mixed sex toilets, funnily enough! They certainly don’t campaign for mixed sex toilets with door gaps.

This is a really valid point for people to consider, so thank you for raising it.

DrudgeJedd · 05/05/2026 23:16

Looks like someone has come to their senses, the link to buy the stickers comes up with a 404 now.
Silly sods

SidewaysOtter · 06/05/2026 10:29

DrudgeJedd · 05/05/2026 23:16

Looks like someone has come to their senses, the link to buy the stickers comes up with a 404 now.
Silly sods

Looks like someone remembered what “intellectual property infringement” is then…

BambooLampshade · 06/05/2026 11:30

Ha ha ha. I gave it a week, and that's how long it lasted...

OP posts:
DrudgeJedd · 06/05/2026 11:30

Knicked from X 😁

Good Law Project are now selling "JK Rowlling is a transphobe" stickers