Meet the Other Phone. A phone that grows with your child.

Meet the Other Phone.
A phone that grows with your child.

Buy now

Please or to access all these features

Feminism: Sex and gender discussions

Disappointed that Chimamanda Ngozie Adichie is promoting her use of surrogacy as compatible with feminism

296 replies

Carla786 · 20/04/2026 01:36

I loved Purple Hibiscus and recently got through the rest of her books from my library. I really like her novels and especially her GC stance, but I was discussing her on a feminist subreddit recently and her use of surrogacy came up. It's disappointing she promotes it here as compatible with feminism,

https://www.premiumtimesng.com/entertainment/naija-fashion/791804-ive-no-regrets-welcoming-my-twins-through-surrogacy-chimamanda-adichie.html

Infertility is of course extremely painful, but I don't think that justifies using another woman's womb.

‘I've no regrets welcoming my twins through surrogacy’ - Chimamanda Adichie

“I want more women to feel less ashamed of talking about reaching motherhood through non-traditional means.”

https://www.premiumtimesng.com/entertainment/naija-fashion/791804-ive-no-regrets-welcoming-my-twins-through-surrogacy-chimamanda-adichie.html

OP posts:
Thread gallery
5
GlovedhandsCecilia · 20/04/2026 11:31

WydeStrype · 20/04/2026 11:28

But you ignore the child in this, don't you?

It is so fundamental, that babies should not be deliberately conceived to be traded/gifted/sold. The women are part of but not in any way the sole consideration.

We always ignore the baby's thoughts when we conceive one.

GlovedhandsCecilia · 20/04/2026 11:34

selffellatingouroborosofhate · 20/04/2026 10:59

That baby knows the heartbeat of its mother from within the womb, before birth. The very first breath it takes, it inhales its mother's smell. Newborns instinctively seek their mothers' breasts to feed.

Handing the baby to the commissioners breaks that bond that predates birth.

Why do you think all birth plans mean handing the baby straight over?

KnottyAuty · 20/04/2026 11:35

GlovedhandsCecilia · 20/04/2026 10:40

Does it show that with surrogates? Can you show that information? Because the information I am privy to says the way we adopt in this country is what causes the infants trauma. The multiple caregivers before permanent placement etc. These things are not the case for surrogates.

"the way we adopt in this country is what causes the infants trauma"

I am sure the process for adoption is problematic but we cannot escape our genes or the resulting brain chemistry. The circumstances leading to adoption are very complicated and genetic factors cannot be parented out.

GlovedhandsCecilia · 20/04/2026 11:38

KnottyAuty · 20/04/2026 11:35

"the way we adopt in this country is what causes the infants trauma"

I am sure the process for adoption is problematic but we cannot escape our genes or the resulting brain chemistry. The circumstances leading to adoption are very complicated and genetic factors cannot be parented out.

Research says otherwise : - D

Humptydumptysat · 20/04/2026 11:47

GlovedhandsCecilia · 20/04/2026 11:34

Why do you think all birth plans mean handing the baby straight over?

So you think the baby spending a few hours or perhaps days strengthening the bond with its mother won’t make the separation more traumatic?

Humptydumptysat · 20/04/2026 11:47

GlovedhandsCecilia · 20/04/2026 11:38

Research says otherwise : - D

What research says genetic factors can be parented out? Please provide a link to research supporting your position,

OpheliaWitchoftheWoods · 20/04/2026 11:48

GlovedhandsCecilia · 20/04/2026 10:40

Does it show that with surrogates? Can you show that information? Because the information I am privy to says the way we adopt in this country is what causes the infants trauma. The multiple caregivers before permanent placement etc. These things are not the case for surrogates.

Then you need to get privy with a bit more information really.

In the States where adoptive parents are present in the room when the mother gives birth, where they take the baby immediately, some of those children still present with trauma and attachment needs, some of whom can suffer severely. Those stories are easy to find if you follow attachment and trauma studies, and the programmes and approaches families are involved in.

It's rather like transitioning isn't it? Because it works out ok on the roulette board for some kids, why worry about the ones it damages and has a lifelong impact on?

It is people trafficking, with all of the many issues involved, and that's before you look at the profound selfishness of commissioning a child with the open intent of depriving it of its mother at birth. The child is a commodity in this; it's feelings aren't considered relevant compared to the adult's desire to parent it. Pre adoption training for adults starts with the explanation that adoption is rooted in loss for all concerned; at least it is honest about this.

KnottyAuty · 20/04/2026 11:52

ladykale · 20/04/2026 11:19

The comments about being a surrogate to a SIL or family member are so weird.

Does this means mums can’t do sky diving because there’s a risk? Can’t climb Mount Everest? How about skiing off piste - notable number of deaths from avalanches / other accidents?

If you have excellent healthcare, are in good health yourself, have been pregnant before and had had low risk pregnancies and are below a certain age, it’s hardly 50/50 risking death is i
I have had all my kids and I’m still at an age where I would happily act as a surrogate to my sister if she couldn’t otherwise have children! No family pressure needed - I’d be very happy to do it!

It is all about different experiences and perspectives isn't it?

If all your children are healthy and well it won't have occurred to you but since having my DS I am very aware that if something were to happen to me. other people wouldn't look after him well because he is not an easy person to care for. I know that he would be treated poorly or with indifference because that is our experience from school/medical so far. If I werent here (and even if it were his DF as carer in my absence) things would be very horrible for him.

Personally I found that my attitude to risk did change al lot after parenthood. I do worry about accidents and dying more than I used to. Even about injury - and I got breast cancer a couple of years ago and that has made it even worse! I am now very focussed on arrangements to make sure my DS will be cared for if I am not around. But that happened (to a lesser degree) even before my cancer or that I knew he would have additional needs - at a few days old even when the responsibility of what I had done hit me!

Anyway all that is only relevant in the sense that I have become acutely aware that there seems to be a "bekind" issue with surrogacy. It seems to encourage women to remain naive to a lot of the significant difficulties until it is too late. It will be years before the results of studies are available but my hypothesis is that the outcomes will be around the same as adoption - where at least prospective parents are screened and counselled to an degree that doesn't seem to be the case with surrogacy.

GlovedhandsCecilia · 20/04/2026 11:53

Humptydumptysat · 20/04/2026 11:47

So you think the baby spending a few hours or perhaps days strengthening the bond with its mother won’t make the separation more traumatic?

Not necessarily. I think we were thinking of more a transition over a few days/weeks where we both care for the baby.

Humptydumptysat · 20/04/2026 12:00

GlovedhandsCecilia · 20/04/2026 11:53

Not necessarily. I think we were thinking of more a transition over a few days/weeks where we both care for the baby.

What a lovely incredibly naive idea for everyone involved.

KnottyAuty · 20/04/2026 12:00

GlovedhandsCecilia · 20/04/2026 11:38

Research says otherwise : - D

I am not familiar with the research but please do post more details here.

I understood from the twin adoption studies from the 1980s that the genetic component was found to be the majory factor. Sorry I don't have a link - but the rate was something like 50% for identical twins compared to 5% for non identical for different behaviours like risk taking and psychiatric problems

selffellatingouroborosofhate · 20/04/2026 12:17

GlovedhandsCecilia · 20/04/2026 10:47

Her husband. Her on laws. Her parents. Her community. Society? Could be anyone. Shes been groomed since birth, remember?

Most men are pretty indifferent to having children. In societies where contraceptive use is normal, it's predominately the woman driving the pregnancy decision.

I'm not sure how having a baby is "kind" to any of the other people you list. They aren't involved in raising the child. They aren't craving a baby to cradle in their arms and raise according to their values. The "kindness" of the surrogate mother is in relieving that craving for another woman, which is where the conditioning to be kind and sacrifice herself for others kicks in.

selffellatingouroborosofhate · 20/04/2026 12:23

GlovedhandsCecilia · 20/04/2026 11:34

Why do you think all birth plans mean handing the baby straight over?

Most of them do, to try to spare the surrogate mother the heartbreak of bonding further with the baby she nurtured inside her and then breaking that strengthened bond.

Underthemoon1 · 20/04/2026 12:25

It's great to have a thread debating surrogacy, but very unnecessary and distasteful to link it to Adichie while she greives after the recent death of one of her children.

selffellatingouroborosofhate · 20/04/2026 12:39

Underthemoon1 · 20/04/2026 12:25

It's great to have a thread debating surrogacy, but very unnecessary and distasteful to link it to Adichie while she greives after the recent death of one of her children.

Edited

She wrote a defence of surrogacy. Her recent tragic loss of a child doesn't make her immune to having that defence critiqued.

OpheliaWitchoftheWoods · 20/04/2026 12:47

GlovedhandsCecilia · 20/04/2026 11:53

Not necessarily. I think we were thinking of more a transition over a few days/weeks where we both care for the baby.

To what end?

The desired goal here is to separate mother and child isn't it?

How does it help for the mother to increase her attachment to the child she is about to permanently hand over? And how does it help the baby to bond further to the mother it is about to be permanently deprived of?

Who benefits from this? Other than perhaps the removing party feeling a little better about themselves and what they are doing to these two other humans?

Humptydumptysat · 20/04/2026 13:04

Underthemoon1 · 20/04/2026 12:25

It's great to have a thread debating surrogacy, but very unnecessary and distasteful to link it to Adichie while she greives after the recent death of one of her children.

Edited

Grieving for a child doesn’t mean their actions or statements cannot be held to examination.

Carla786 · 20/04/2026 14:58

BootMaker · 20/04/2026 02:35

Nice argument if it makes it ok to use another woman's womb to your benefit.

As I said, I'm hard line, as far as I'm concerned this shouldn't even be a conversation.

I see no hypocrisy in my stance.

It's a hard no. Not even worth discussion unless you see others as body parts to be used to your benefit.

And before you ask, I'm as philosophically hard-line regarding organ donation. Death or infertility aren't the worse things that can happen to a person, they're very individual and one is universal. The idea of living in a society where we're just a tool-box of organs for others is worse.

The idea that we're just bits dehumanises us all.

Hang on, you think ALL organ donation is immoral? Even by dead donors?

OP posts:
MarmaladeorJam · 20/04/2026 15:10

2021x · 20/04/2026 03:54

I come at this from the stance that children are not a human right.

I agree that if the woman is prepared to take the risk of the pregnancy and the birth, there is not a lot anyone -including the law- can do about it.

I also see a hell of a lot of room for exploitation of vulnerable women to happen here. Also some room for desperate exploitation of the would-be-parents.

There is also this underlying uncomfortable idea that women’s bodily functions are fine to be sold. The same prostitution… that the reason there is a market is because of the entitlement for others. It doesn’t sit well
with me, and I would be very concerned about anyone entering into an agreement.

Edited

It always strikes me that women's organs are for sale - vaginas for sex, womb for babies.

Let's sell kidneys? After all, we could share the market place with the menfolk - males and females all have two each. It is unfair that we hoover up all that lovely money.

But - selling kidneys is not ethical...

SpidersAreShitheads · 20/04/2026 15:22

I will just mention at this point that Cecilia has a fun habit of inserting herself into a debate and making the whole post about her.

She’s also got a habit of not backing women. Shes under the impression that a man telling a woman to go and fuck herself with a splintered rolling pin is a perfectly normal thing to say and not in any way violent.

I’m not going to waste my time responding to someone who is so very clearly and consistently anti-women. It’s not about differences in opinion - it’s about not wasting my time on someone who clearly doesn’t consider women’s rights important.

GlovedhandsCecilia · 20/04/2026 15:28

OpheliaWitchoftheWoods · 20/04/2026 11:48

Then you need to get privy with a bit more information really.

In the States where adoptive parents are present in the room when the mother gives birth, where they take the baby immediately, some of those children still present with trauma and attachment needs, some of whom can suffer severely. Those stories are easy to find if you follow attachment and trauma studies, and the programmes and approaches families are involved in.

It's rather like transitioning isn't it? Because it works out ok on the roulette board for some kids, why worry about the ones it damages and has a lifelong impact on?

It is people trafficking, with all of the many issues involved, and that's before you look at the profound selfishness of commissioning a child with the open intent of depriving it of its mother at birth. The child is a commodity in this; it's feelings aren't considered relevant compared to the adult's desire to parent it. Pre adoption training for adults starts with the explanation that adoption is rooted in loss for all concerned; at least it is honest about this.

I think we have to be actually factual about what we are saying. Adoptive kids with fewer caregivers have less trauma. A surrogate goes from one parent to the other. the baby only knows one home and additionally,;typically lacks the genetic and social factors that predispose them to trauma. Drugs arent likely to be a factor. Nor is serious mental illness.

I get that you want people to be convinced by your arguments, but making things up isnt the way to go about it. Its okay for you to be against surrogacy just because it squicks you out. You dont have to make things up for your opinion to be valid.

Carla786 · 20/04/2026 15:28

Summerhillsquare · 20/04/2026 07:24

These are class issues. Yes she is a feminist and a great writer but she's also from an upper class background and is used to servants and things done for her. Such people simply pay others to solve their problems.

Love the art not the artist!

This was my thought too.
A lot of the Nigerian and other African writers who break through seem to be from pretty well-off backgrounds. I wonder if there are any exceptions? This affects the kind of view we hear, especially as Adichie was anointed the voice of Nigeria & Nigerian women in some ways

OP posts:
GlovedhandsCecilia · 20/04/2026 15:30

SpidersAreShitheads · 20/04/2026 15:22

I will just mention at this point that Cecilia has a fun habit of inserting herself into a debate and making the whole post about her.

She’s also got a habit of not backing women. Shes under the impression that a man telling a woman to go and fuck herself with a splintered rolling pin is a perfectly normal thing to say and not in any way violent.

I’m not going to waste my time responding to someone who is so very clearly and consistently anti-women. It’s not about differences in opinion - it’s about not wasting my time on someone who clearly doesn’t consider women’s rights important.

I ahbrnt made the post about me, i gave my experience and then again, because you all find it really hard to take when a woman disagrees with you, you all have to continually question me about my views. You can't help yourselves.

Then when that doesnt work, you try to Badmouth me. It's really becoming tedious. You wont get women to agree with you by trying to bully and ostracise them. Be better than that.

Dodorogers · 20/04/2026 15:31

Carla786 · 20/04/2026 01:57

Yes. Taking advantage of poor women is one factor. Another is, as you say, someone maybe getting almost addicted to being pregnant (which can give a massive high, after all- my mother was crazy to get pregnant again as soon ad I saw born. A few weeks later, she was glad she didn't

Addicted to pregnancy? If someone wants to be a surrogate surely that is a woman’s choice. The issue is when it is purely for money and there is a wealth/power divide surely

GlovedhandsCecilia · 20/04/2026 15:32

Carla786 · 20/04/2026 14:58

Hang on, you think ALL organ donation is immoral? Even by dead donors?

Yes. She's thinks small children who need a liver transplant should just die because death isnt the worst thing that can happen to a person (or their parents, i guess).