Meet the Other Phone. Protection built in.

Meet the Other Phone.
Protection built in.

Buy now

Please or to access all these features

Feminism: Sex and gender discussions

Grace Campbell - Alastair Campbell

597 replies

BlueLegume · 17/04/2026 18:24

If I have missed any threads already started about this then apologies.

I am literally lost for words on the post she added to her podcast along with Charlie Craggs.

My own daughter has been lost to this cause. I am hoping I get her back. How utterly vile can a young woman be - Grace Campbell - towards women who have worked so hard to give her such privilege. I might be ugly and a freak Grace with awful hair. But I am not a mean girl.

OP posts:
Thread gallery
27
StillSpartacus · 20/04/2026 07:56

Personally, I think “why” is the interesting bit. I don’t think there is any dispute that what she said was appalling, but I am curious to understand why she is still so utterly captured by an ideology that has caused her harm and hurt.

We can see her fear of upsetting CC in the video. We hear her misogynistic criticism of other women. We sense the undercurrent of centuries old tropes about rape and we feel the trauma that underlies it.

We understand that Grace isn’t the independent young woman she claims to be, and we recognise this phase. Many of us too, have had to learn that being a feminist still means living in the world as it is, not as we think it should be. It’s beyond frustrating that Grace and others of her ilk can identify the problem of VAWG and not the cause - or the necessary steps to protect all biological women.

TL:DR Grace has yet to learn to listen to women and stop centring men.

DrBlackbird · 20/04/2026 07:57

Much of liberal feminism is just misogyny in a new disguise, though.

Depressingly true.

Depressing because of how many young women have been told bullshit lies dressed up as liberal feminism. That pole / lap dancing is empowering and that ‘sex positivity’ is women claiming their sexuality or that ‘open’ relationships are progressive or having a ‘safe’ word whilst being choked is normal, that vanilla sex is boring and and, of course, the main one sold to girls at university that ‘sex work is work’ and a harm free way to make money.

All of those serve some not very nice men. Definitely are not serving our daughters. Definitely not progressive.

TransParentlyAnnoyed · 20/04/2026 08:20

BlueLegume · 19/04/2026 09:37

Thank you to all contributors to this thread. I include those posters who slightly derailed it as well. As with much in the world of trans ideology the words and language used to affirm this madness, yes I mean madness, see people who must know what reality is dance around twisting language to ‘be kind’.

Being kind for me is acknowledging truth not affirming lies.

Being kind is normal, and should be what everyone aspires to.

Reality, I'm afraid, very much includes trans people. Getting vexed about their existence, supportive parents, clothing choices and even adjectives (!!) is a ridiculous waste of time.

Raging that trans people dare to exist and express themselves without your permission is controlling behaviour, as is demanding that a child falls into line & agrees with you.

Please get help. Seriously.

TheKeatingFive · 20/04/2026 08:25

TransParentlyAnnoyed · 20/04/2026 08:20

Being kind is normal, and should be what everyone aspires to.

Reality, I'm afraid, very much includes trans people. Getting vexed about their existence, supportive parents, clothing choices and even adjectives (!!) is a ridiculous waste of time.

Raging that trans people dare to exist and express themselves without your permission is controlling behaviour, as is demanding that a child falls into line & agrees with you.

Please get help. Seriously.

No one is questioning anyone's right to 'exist'.

You already know that though - you just need to twist the narrative. We get what you are trying to do. But no one is buying it.

What is being questioned is that humans can change sex. We all know they can't. Or that some nebulous concept of 'gender' is more important than sex for wider society. It transparently isn't.

Telling lies about any of this, to vulnerable young people, is the opposite of kind.

Neurodiversitydoctor · 20/04/2026 08:27

POWNewcastleEastWallsend · 19/04/2026 22:33

As the thread is about Grace, I went and read that Guardian article again - and have just seen that ArabellaScott read it too.

I made a name for myself with ‘sex-positive’ comedy. Then I was raped on a night out. Would my openness be used against me?
6 Aug 2022

IMHO the saddest, most disturbing thing about Grace's article, recounting events from when she was 27, is not that she was raped but that in the very first line she explains that, on the bounce from a series of failed relationships, she decides to be what used to be known as a "groupie":

"Last November, after a string of relationships with men had gone wrong, I decided to go to Los Angeles for a few months to try to fulfil my lifelong dream of having sex with an A-list celebrity."

For those too young to know, "groupies" were usually schoolgirls who, from the age of 13-14, dressed-up to look well beyond the age of consent in order to hang out with and shag musicians, football players, etc. then brag about it the next day at school. The ones who had notches on their bed posts for scoring house-hold name pop and rock stars sometimes featured in the gutter press but they were just the tip of the iceberg.

The wannabe-groupies I remember from my all-girls school were all very beautiful, elegant, aloof, middle-class and considered themselves to be "trés sophis". They looked down on the rest of us, who were shyly holding hands with boys who offered to carry our satchels home from school, because the night before they had been out getting spit-roasted by members of a 3rd tier rock band or 4th Division football club.

Some disappeared from school for a while. When they returned they were quiet and withdrawn, as well they might be after an abortion or giving birth out of town to a baby who was immediately given up for adoption. (Those were the days when it simply wasn't done for a nice, middle-class girl to have a baby out of wedlock.)

Some had mental breakdowns and/or got hooked on drugs supplied to them by the men they were hanging out with.

Some came out of it unscathed but the most beautiful of the bunch, who was a lovely girl and not part of the "snobby set", killed herself after someone sent an envelope full of incriminating Polaroid photos to her parents.

Pre-social media it was Polaroid photos that were the undoing of the unwary. Apparently, none of the men were recognisable as only their disembodied shagging parts were pictured but IIRC there was thereafter closer supervision of some of the football players and a couple of them accidentally walked into doors.

It would be miracle of none of those girls were not raped. I am sure some of them must have been.

None of us thought any the worse of those girls for their under-age sexual exploits. It was the snobbishness and superiority (of most of them) that pissed us off. If any of those girls had killed themselves I don't think we would have been bothered but everyone was upset and distressed when that beautiful, sweet girl killed herself.

The schoolboys who never stood a chance of dating her, and had never mentioned her before, were emboldened to repeat the one "joke" they had landed on to demean and degrade her memory, "More pricks than a dartboard!"

Grace Campbell, living in Cloud Cuckoo Guardian Reader Land, learned at 27 that men who were schoolboys in the 2000's were not so very different to men who were schoolboys in the 1960's and 70's.

Back to the article . . .

"The first time I visited LA, I went to Lady Gaga’s house. The second time, I danced with Drake’s dad in a club in west Hollywood."

Equally despised by those with whom they hung around, were "Liggers", including "wannabe groupies" on the look out for "prizes" to shag.

At 27, Grace seemed to be operating at the same level of maturity as schoolgirl groupies and liggers. She just happens to be well-connected and well-off, so is hobnobbing with the Stars in Hollywood and LA, rather than inviting D-Listers to gang-bang her on the pub pool table after hours.

What is different is that Grace thought that men were different now to when her parents were her age, whereas most of us know that that ain't so.

Or maybe she just thought that men of her elite leftie class were different? Not like those 'orrible oiks, chavs, gammons, etc. (who voted Blair into power and gave Daddy such an important job).

At least she recognises that her status might have counted for little if she had reported the rape:

"In the last decade, we’ve seen time and again that rape victims do not receive adequate protection from legal systems. My friends and I follow rape trials and the way they can end prematurely, because we want to know what might happen to us if we went to the police. We have memorised the facts. We know that in the year to September 2021, in England and Wales alone, 63,136 allegations of rape were taken to the police. Only 820 resulted in a charge or summons. That’s 1.3% of rape accusations.

The physical evidence that can ensure a conviction needs to be collected within a week, so if someone decides weeks, or months, or even years later that they want to go to the police, their case could be weakened. All too often, it’s your word against theirs, and their word is male, and it is louder than yours.

As one woman who went to police with an allegation of rape told the BBC: “It felt as though I was the one being investigated.” Her case didn’t make it to trial. When you go to the police, your phone can be taken away from you. Past messages, photos and correspondence on dating apps can be used as evidence, along with medical records, including alcohol use, mental health issues, STI history. Not every survivor of rape is equipped for the stress that all of this entails."

So she is grounded in reality enough to know that her public "sex positivity" might have affected how the Police, here and in the USA, would have dealt with her. Also that women generally are subjected to yet another ordeal if they decide to report that they have been raped.

Yet she seems to think that this is an institutional anomaly, something that does not reflect attitudes towards women and women as sexual beings generally:

"I had really thought that more was changing in terms of the collective male psyche. I’d hoped that since #MeToo, men now had a better understanding of consent, of why certain events or actions aren’t acceptable. But after Las Vegas, I’ve had a few uncomfortable experiences talking to men that have made me question that."

One of those men was someone she was dating and another was a male friend. She is shocked, shocked I tell you, that some of the men she dates and is friends with are sexist pigs. Shocked that #MeToo did not change how men think about and sometimes behave towards women.

The plane of unreality that these people attempt to inhabit must drive them mad with cognitive dissonance.

The only big difference from the schoolgirl groupies of the 1970's is that it seems very unlikely that Grace would have killed herself if someone had sent her parents photos of her being consensually gang-banged. Which is nothing to do with "sex-positivity" because I also doubt that they would have greeted her with, "Hey Grace, looks like you had a great time last night gobbling those cocks!"

The article ends:

"The world loves to praise a sex-positive woman until she is challenging the very things about the world that have made her want to be sex-positive."

"The world" . . . that would be:
a) men and
b) "feminist" Guardian columnists?

"I can be a cocky, self-proclaimed slut, who wears revealing tops, and writes shows about being obsessed with men, and I can also be raped. Those two things can exist at the same time. I know this, because it’s what happened to me."

Yes, but it is hardly the discovery of the age that #MeToo did not change this.

Is she equating "sex-positivity" with being a "slut"?

I don't know anything about her apart from this article and the video of the cringe-worthy conversation with her mate Charlie Craggs.

Is she "reclaiming" slut and seeking to purify the term of its derogatory connotations?

Or is she revelling in what she perceives as clique-approved transgressive behaviour, which she celebrates as being the actions of an aren't-I-just-wonderful "slut"?

https://www.theguardian.com/society/2022/aug/06/sex-positive-comedy-las-vegas-rape

She seems very childish and I kept thinking, "Who is she doing this for? Is it really for her "sex-positive" self? If not, who is she trying to impress?"

I agree, I really hope she can find peace and happiness som

5MinuteArgument · 20/04/2026 08:32

I've met quite a few people like Grace Campbell. They're the type of people who go on pro-Palestine marches and say spiteful things about Jews, who sing along to hip hop lyrics that glorify violence, and excuse terrible behaviour when it's their side.

They're part of the 'in' group and that gives them full licence to attack the 'out' group (gender critical women are of course part of the 'out' group). There are many examples of this mentality: high school 'mean girls', office bullies, all the way to witch hunters, totalitarian regimes etc.

I have no sympathy for people who behave like this. Their behaviour is toxic.

Datun · 20/04/2026 08:36

"Last November, after a string of relationships with men had gone wrong, I decided to go to Los Angeles for a few months to try to fulfil my lifelong dream of having sex with an A-list celebrity."

Bit of an eye-opener. Because, to me, this practically shouts low self-esteem, compounded by too many relationships with twats and so deciding that her only possible currency and value lies in her fuckability.

Furthermore porn is littered with men for whom that lack of respect for women is a massive turn on. And men who want to be women epitomise this. AGP has turned contempt for women into a fetish, ffs

Maybe Grace wanting to please this man, whilst clearly being rather worried about him, being encouraged to disrespect other women, and finding value in that, isn't much of a surprise.

I bet her dad's attitude hasn't helped either.

If she ever reads this, my advice would be to find value in something else. Maybe writing, which she would appear to be rather good at.

BeSpoonyTurtle · 20/04/2026 08:38

BlueLegume · 17/04/2026 19:35

Let us not get the nepotism baby pile on. I think Eve Hewson is fabulous. I think Liza Tarbuck is fabulous.

Grace Campbell - I am aghast, or am I. You had a great education. How did this end up being your opinion.

You do not know me. You called me ugly. You told me my hair was ugly. You discussed my clothing.

I might not look cool but I have worked a lifetime since the age of 12 with men feeling me up in working men’s clubs. Supermarkets - staff/customers thinking it is ok to comment on my looks. I wasn’t at an all girls selective school protected from boys. I was at a massive comprehensive school. I had no privilege.

It might be sensible to consider we do not all have your privilege. Or looks.

Edited

At 32 Grace Campbell is not a baby, and she has this platform purely because of her parentage.

BackToLurk · 20/04/2026 08:39

TransParentlyAnnoyed · 20/04/2026 08:20

Being kind is normal, and should be what everyone aspires to.

Reality, I'm afraid, very much includes trans people. Getting vexed about their existence, supportive parents, clothing choices and even adjectives (!!) is a ridiculous waste of time.

Raging that trans people dare to exist and express themselves without your permission is controlling behaviour, as is demanding that a child falls into line & agrees with you.

Please get help. Seriously.

What’s truly ridiculous is imagining that sex is neither fixed nor central to female oppression.

soupycustard · 20/04/2026 08:45

BackToLurk · 20/04/2026 08:39

What’s truly ridiculous is imagining that sex is neither fixed nor central to female oppression.

Indeed.

ArabellaScott · 20/04/2026 08:54

TransParentlyAnnoyed · 20/04/2026 08:20

Being kind is normal, and should be what everyone aspires to.

Reality, I'm afraid, very much includes trans people. Getting vexed about their existence, supportive parents, clothing choices and even adjectives (!!) is a ridiculous waste of time.

Raging that trans people dare to exist and express themselves without your permission is controlling behaviour, as is demanding that a child falls into line & agrees with you.

Please get help. Seriously.

Your approach seems very muddled, and based on some very odd beliefs. That's fine in itself, you're entitled to your view, but to preach at other people and try to pressurise or coerced them into going along with what you think is the correct way to think and act is not healthy.

So, gently, can I suggest you think about taking your own advice?

allthingsinmoderation · 20/04/2026 09:32

TransParentlyAnnoyed · 20/04/2026 08:20

Being kind is normal, and should be what everyone aspires to.

Reality, I'm afraid, very much includes trans people. Getting vexed about their existence, supportive parents, clothing choices and even adjectives (!!) is a ridiculous waste of time.

Raging that trans people dare to exist and express themselves without your permission is controlling behaviour, as is demanding that a child falls into line & agrees with you.

Please get help. Seriously.

if being "kind" puts women and girls in danger, discomfort or disadvantages them, thats suicidal empathy and we should be wary of being coerced into doing what some males want at our detriment and at risk of our rights.
I agree,that trans people exist and its not my business what they wear or call themselves. If their parents are supportive great with the exception of the medical and surgical transition of children ,thats abusive. If being kind means male trans people try to access female single sex spaces ,services and sports then it's a no from me.
The "raging" is understandable when people use misogyny (as in GC and CC did in the subject of their thread ,they weren't very "kind" to women and girls) to threaten women's rights.
Please get help . Seriously.

5MinuteArgument · 20/04/2026 09:44

The fact that Grace Campbell is well educated is part of the problem. It's mainly middle class, educated people who buy into the TWAW and TMAM propaganda. I count myself as middle class, but I know the type.

If she'd been poorly educated, she would be far more rooted in reality.

TransParentlyAnnoyed · 20/04/2026 09:56

allthingsinmoderation · 20/04/2026 09:32

if being "kind" puts women and girls in danger, discomfort or disadvantages them, thats suicidal empathy and we should be wary of being coerced into doing what some males want at our detriment and at risk of our rights.
I agree,that trans people exist and its not my business what they wear or call themselves. If their parents are supportive great with the exception of the medical and surgical transition of children ,thats abusive. If being kind means male trans people try to access female single sex spaces ,services and sports then it's a no from me.
The "raging" is understandable when people use misogyny (as in GC and CC did in the subject of their thread ,they weren't very "kind" to women and girls) to threaten women's rights.
Please get help . Seriously.

Jesus actual Christ. You're a bit late, perspective was discovered several centuries ago.

borntobequiet · 20/04/2026 09:59

Ms Campbell is uncouth, unfunny, unpleasant and uninformed, despite her privileged background and connections, and seems to have a habit of making very poor life choices. That’s about all you can say about her.

I’m actually finding the derails more interesting, because once again they expose the idiocy of genderism. The logic on display here is especially egregious (love this word).

allthingsinmoderation · 20/04/2026 10:01

TransParentlyAnnoyed · 20/04/2026 09:56

Jesus actual Christ. You're a bit late, perspective was discovered several centuries ago.

What "perspective" do you think i don't have on this?

Gloriia · 20/04/2026 10:09

TransParentlyAnnoyed · 20/04/2026 08:20

Being kind is normal, and should be what everyone aspires to.

Reality, I'm afraid, very much includes trans people. Getting vexed about their existence, supportive parents, clothing choices and even adjectives (!!) is a ridiculous waste of time.

Raging that trans people dare to exist and express themselves without your permission is controlling behaviour, as is demanding that a child falls into line & agrees with you.

Please get help. Seriously.

Being kind is indeed normal. Tell that to this podcaster and her pal shrieking 'ugly!' and cackling about allegedly bad hair dos.

No-one denies anyone's right to exist, such a typical dramalama ally comment . What we have said is you cannot change sex and use womens facilities. Fixed that for you.

Gasp0deTheW0nderD0g · 20/04/2026 10:21

Nothing about gender ideology has ever made any sense to me. I am unable to go along with it for a great many reasons but the root cause is that it's nonsense. Nobody can change sex. How people dress, how long their hair is, whether they wear makeup, flat shoes etc etc, which hobbies, toys and interests they choose - all aspects of personality. Nothing whatsoever to do with the unavoidable reality of going through life in a female body or a male body, which is not a choice, it's the end result of the chromosomes we acquire at conception.

If my daughter had ever told me she believed she was actually male I would be kindly but firmly telling her that she was and always would be female. I would also be seeking mental health support for her. I would want to find out what she thought would change about her life if she belonged to the opposite sex.

The key difference that nobody can do anything about is reproductive roles, which is a function of biology. Women and girls are treated differently in many ways because of their biology and because of illogical beliefs about how that biology limits or shapes their life options. This can be challenged. It's desperately sad that some confused young women have been conned into thinking that they can opt out of that sexism by pretending to be male. Much healthier to face reality.

I wouldn't be taking to the internet to try to cajole others into going along with her deluded beliefs.

Ormally · 20/04/2026 10:23

Tell that to this podcaster and her pal shrieking 'ugly!' and cackling about allegedly bad hair dos.

Yes, it's not struck me before, but this level of comedy is of the ilk of (say) Benny Hill or 'Take my wife...please', and that didn't age well. They say one of the recipes for comedy is Tragedy plus Time - we certainly have the first.

BendoftheBeginning · 20/04/2026 10:28

SionnachRuadh · 17/04/2026 23:20

That's another cautionary tale. If Gary Lineker had just stuck to what he was good at - reading out the football scores, laughing at Alan Shearer's terrible jokes, and advertising crisps - he still might be well thought of today.

He’s still pretty well thought of, just not by right wing activists. The average person isn’t that political and not that bothered - they only paid attention to the football scores in the first place.

BendoftheBeginning · 20/04/2026 10:33

Gasp0deTheW0nderD0g · 20/04/2026 10:21

Nothing about gender ideology has ever made any sense to me. I am unable to go along with it for a great many reasons but the root cause is that it's nonsense. Nobody can change sex. How people dress, how long their hair is, whether they wear makeup, flat shoes etc etc, which hobbies, toys and interests they choose - all aspects of personality. Nothing whatsoever to do with the unavoidable reality of going through life in a female body or a male body, which is not a choice, it's the end result of the chromosomes we acquire at conception.

If my daughter had ever told me she believed she was actually male I would be kindly but firmly telling her that she was and always would be female. I would also be seeking mental health support for her. I would want to find out what she thought would change about her life if she belonged to the opposite sex.

The key difference that nobody can do anything about is reproductive roles, which is a function of biology. Women and girls are treated differently in many ways because of their biology and because of illogical beliefs about how that biology limits or shapes their life options. This can be challenged. It's desperately sad that some confused young women have been conned into thinking that they can opt out of that sexism by pretending to be male. Much healthier to face reality.

I wouldn't be taking to the internet to try to cajole others into going along with her deluded beliefs.

Yes, and I think this is the crux of why people like Grace Campbell act the way they do. Deep down they KNOW their position is indefensible, and that they’ve chosen to Be Kind to a few people they know personally and then extend the “kindness” into national policy no matter what the actual outcomes are for everyone else.

Their only fallback is deciding that everyone else is bad and they are good, so anything they do is justified. It’s where the thought terminating cliche starts.

TheKeatingFive · 20/04/2026 10:34

BendoftheBeginning · 20/04/2026 10:28

He’s still pretty well thought of, just not by right wing activists. The average person isn’t that political and not that bothered - they only paid attention to the football scores in the first place.

Any woman paying attention to issues around women's sport will be feeling utterly let down by him. He's been appallingly cowardly on that issue.

ArabellaScott · 20/04/2026 10:35

TransParentlyAnnoyed · 20/04/2026 09:56

Jesus actual Christ. You're a bit late, perspective was discovered several centuries ago.

Perspective has always been there. Its simple physics.

What Renaissance painters explored about how to portray that natural phenomenon (they didn't discover it) was a bit more complex, and largely to do with how religious representations had flattened the picture plane during the medieval period. Giotto reasserting human scale and place in the world was part of the precursor to the Enlightenment.

There are parallels (ha!) here with the assertion that a gendered soul outweighs biological sex.

ArabellaScott · 20/04/2026 10:36

'The world goes on being round" 'eppor su muove', etc. Forgive my maybe misremembered spelling.

TheKeatingFive · 20/04/2026 10:57

For the parents of gender confused children out there who have made a choice to confirm.

That was your choice to make. None of us have insight as to how and why you made that decision. It is not our business.

However, you made that decision without wider buy-in that this was the right thing to do for society at large. Given this, you could not expect everyone else to affirm also.

There are multiple good reasons why people refuse to pretend that men can become women and vice versa. You have no right to try to emotionally blackmail or intimidate people into supporting the position you took. That is the bottom line.