Meet the Other Phone. A phone that grows with your child.

Meet the Other Phone.
A phone that grows with your child.

Buy now

Please or to access all these features

Feminism: Sex and gender discussions

Is there ANY concern among Trans Rights Activists for the health wellbeing of adolescents receiving gender affirming drugs that the findings of the Finnish study might be true

1000 replies

mardirousse · 10/04/2026 15:21

You would expect Trans Rights Activists to be concerned about the physical mental health of gender questioning children, yet I haven't seen a single TRA express the slightest concern that gender affirming care might be causing harm to young kids, who they see as transgender. Not here, not on r/transgenderuk, not on x.
They are attacking the credibility of the study, but given its size and the very shocking findings, why aren't at least some of them expressing a little concern that there might be something in it? I mean, these are vulnerable kids, and they're taking really powerful drugs with major long-term consequences, and now it looks like there's evidence that it may be doing the opposite of what it's supposed to...
How could you not be concerned, whatever your agenda? They're kids!
Aren't trans rights activists interested in the right of trans kids to be safe and healthy?
Am I missing something?

OP posts:
Thread gallery
6
22ztr · 15/04/2026 12:02

NotBadConsidering · 15/04/2026 12:01

You’re the one saying it’s just like other treatments. Why don’t you explain it?

It’s not my viewpoint. Wouldn’t do it justice. I’m just aware it exists and it needs researching

TriesNotToBeCynical · 15/04/2026 12:03

22ztr · 15/04/2026 11:57

I’d say the same about your view on pronouns. Let’s agree to disagree

The analogy between pronouns and drugs has been made.

RedToothBrush · 15/04/2026 12:05

TriesNotToBeCynical · 15/04/2026 12:03

The analogy between pronouns and drugs has been made.

Quite.

Disingenuous bullshit.

RedToothBrush · 15/04/2026 12:07

It's starting to sound a lot like mansplaining again. Talking at us and over us and not actually listening or taking on board because they know better and soon they will be in charge before a new thinking which understands the world better blah blah blah.

Disrespectful offensive nonsense.

I believe I can fly. Splat.

TriesNotToBeCynical · 15/04/2026 12:09

22ztr · 15/04/2026 11:59

Hehehe you assume I use the nhs 😜

In principle, doctors outside the NHS are bound by the same law and the same ethics. Drug peddlers, not so much. I am sure it is possible to buy guns, too.

NotBadConsidering · 15/04/2026 12:09

22ztr · 15/04/2026 12:02

It’s not my viewpoint. Wouldn’t do it justice. I’m just aware it exists and it needs researching

It was your viewpoint just a few pages that because HRT is prescribed for mental health issues it’s just an example of “off label” prescribing that is similar to trans people getting CSH.

So your viewpoint is wrong because your comparison is wrong, because they are world’s apart. Unless you can explain your viewpoint better.

22ztr · 15/04/2026 12:12

Hahaha I love it when you guys argue with me and call me a man and start saying my beliefs are dangerous because the holes you find in them belong to the system and not to me. Kind of like what the TRAs do with you hey?

peace for your lives lovelies and when something else peaks my interest I will be back with my observations 👀

NotBadConsidering · 15/04/2026 12:14

*piques

If you’re going to flounce, at least do it with proper grammar.

RedToothBrush · 15/04/2026 12:14

22ztr · 15/04/2026 12:12

Hahaha I love it when you guys argue with me and call me a man and start saying my beliefs are dangerous because the holes you find in them belong to the system and not to me. Kind of like what the TRAs do with you hey?

peace for your lives lovelies and when something else peaks my interest I will be back with my observations 👀

😂

MagpiePi · 15/04/2026 12:14

Was that a flounce? I'm completely baffled by 22ztr...

Shedmistress · 15/04/2026 12:20

This reply has been deleted

Message deleted by MNHQ. Here's a link to our Talk Guidelines.

GreyskySexRealistsky · 15/04/2026 12:20

Well, that was really fucking immature!

Wearenotborg · 15/04/2026 12:51

22ztr · 15/04/2026 09:07

Look your trying to pull me into a semantics arguement again. I agree on single sex spaces. You are preaching to the choir. Why not tell me your thoughts on restricting access to hormones because that will impact me. I want all the drugs to go through menopause and I want drs happy and confident prescribing them. If tras get me that by shouting loudly fab.

Did you nor see there is worldwide shortage of HRT? So in your opinion, who shout get priority? Menopausal women or trans identified males? Why would the ability of men being able to access HRT impact your ability to access HRT?

TheBroonOneAndTheWhiteOne · 15/04/2026 13:16

NotBadConsidering · 15/04/2026 12:14

*piques

If you’re going to flounce, at least do it with proper grammar.

I was just about to post that.
Grin

Helleofabore · 15/04/2026 13:35

i see.

Another, I just want to have my opinion heard no matter how much it is based on flawed logic and if you challenge me, I am going to consider it hostile and unwelcoming. While praising the male poster who is actually really disrespectful in many ways, just not noticed by the poster and cannot support his arguments at all except for reference to beliefs and emotional reasoning.

it feels like a script. I wonder if it is the ‘be kind’ influence. The ‘I will treat all people’s opinions like they are all valid and accurate’ approach even when the opinion is plainly flawed.

nutmeg7 · 15/04/2026 13:48

MagpiePi · 15/04/2026 10:24

What?

How would the effects of oestrogen on a male body be any way relevant to its effects on a menopausal female body?

I think @22ztrhas bought into the belief that make and female bodies are no different at the cellular level, and in how we process drugs.

He’s very wrong of course. It seems to be an ill informed belief that our bodies are just a blank canvas onto which we can pour one set of hormones or the other with no regard to the underlying female or male body. These people don’t seem to understand that male/female differences go way beyond visible sex characteristics.

Not sure what we can do about the ignorance. I don’t think we can sort it out here.

nutmeg7 · 15/04/2026 13:49

22ztr · 15/04/2026 12:12

Hahaha I love it when you guys argue with me and call me a man and start saying my beliefs are dangerous because the holes you find in them belong to the system and not to me. Kind of like what the TRAs do with you hey?

peace for your lives lovelies and when something else peaks my interest I will be back with my observations 👀

Piques my interest.

anyolddinosaur · 15/04/2026 13:49

Another who wishes to detract from the study. I've read some of the "criticism" and it's the usual sort of thing you expect from TRAs - resistance to normal scientific practise and complaints that the authors dont rush to affirm so are horrible meanies and nothing they say can be trusted. If there is sensible criticism of the study perhaps someone will post it.

MagpiePi · 15/04/2026 14:02

nutmeg7 · 15/04/2026 13:48

I think @22ztrhas bought into the belief that make and female bodies are no different at the cellular level, and in how we process drugs.

He’s very wrong of course. It seems to be an ill informed belief that our bodies are just a blank canvas onto which we can pour one set of hormones or the other with no regard to the underlying female or male body. These people don’t seem to understand that male/female differences go way beyond visible sex characteristics.

Not sure what we can do about the ignorance. I don’t think we can sort it out here.

I read it more as a mash up of 'female hormones cause problems in men, many of which are not fully documented, therefore female hormones are dangerous, therefore they won't be allowed to prescribe them for menopausal women' along with something about trans people and destransitioners should all be included in studies on the effects of taking hormones because of their mental health...or something. I really don't know!

I think he just got himself into a hole and kept on digging then had to resort to name calling and flouncing off when he couldn't get out.

GreyskySexRealistsky · 15/04/2026 14:12

Just to point out that that poster was probably not a "he". She said "I’m going to be menopausal within the next ten or so years".

That was the basis of her argument (such as it was).

MissGendering · 15/04/2026 14:20

nutmeg7 · 15/04/2026 13:49

Piques my interest.

Sometimes peaks is appropriate tbh.

onepostwonder · 15/04/2026 14:40

Helleofabore · 15/04/2026 07:09

And again with the passive acceptance.

If you were truthful and honest, you would get a different result from some, if not the majority of people. Relying on that passive acceptance is not an honest way to live. It is a comfortable place for you, sure. But it is not getting full and freely given consent.

I understand that you think no one correctly identifies your sex, but having interacted with you, I suspect that I know why no one has told you before, including that it would be a pointless exercise.

Thing is, the law around single sex provision in the UK is clear. Will you follow the law or just ignore the law?

This has never happened to me, but I've seen of women post in FWR to say they've been approached in toilets, etc. by women concerned that the poster is in the wrong space. They are happy to report that they open their mouths and speak and all is made good in the world.

What is different if I were to turn around and speak?

onepostwonder · 15/04/2026 14:50

Helleofabore · 15/04/2026 07:28

The study has shown that claims that treatment and surgery improve mental health for adolescents is again not a claim that can be made, and yet has been made repeatedly by those in authorative and influential positions.

It also shows that the lack of extensive mental health support is an acute issue, in countries such as the UK, both before and after diagnosis and before and after treatments. If Finland, with its high standard of care is showing these issues are not improving then where less mental health support is given it is a very concerning issue.

There is another thread discussing the study. This study was specifically about whether or not a group of people have concerns about adolescents currently receiving treatment.

But it doesn't. It shows appointments to specialist psychiatrists are made at some point after intake and specifically after the start of "gender treatment" which can be a wide variety of things these days.

The study would have to identify actual diagnoses to then claim improved or worsening mental health.

GreyskySexRealistsky · 15/04/2026 14:52

What is different if I were to turn around and speak?

What's the difference whether you speak or not, really?

The onus is - and has always been - on the individual to ensure they enter the correct space for their birth sex.
You've made it quite clear you're not going to do that and you're going to ignore women's wishes and do exactly what you want.

onepostwonder · 15/04/2026 14:53

Helleofabore · 15/04/2026 07:31

So you are specifically a specialist researcher in medical treatments for gender dysphoria ?

How many of the participants in this thread are researchers in medical treatments for gender dysphoria?

I'll start. Not me.

Please create an account

To comment on this thread you need to create a Mumsnet account.

This thread is not accepting new messages.