Meet the Other Phone. Only the apps you allow.

Meet the Other Phone.
Only the apps you allow.

Buy now

Please or to access all these features

Feminism: Sex and gender discussions

International Olympic Committee announcement today! Will it be regarding female sports?

370 replies

Helleofabore · 26/03/2026 12:41

The IOC is making an announcement today. Here is the Youtube link for the live stream.

15.15 UK time. Let's hope it is the speculated announcement that they have decided to exclude any male person who has undergone androgenisation at puberty.

https://t.co/rm06rZDB0u

OP posts:
Thread gallery
27
TheKeatingFive · 26/03/2026 14:05

Great news.

WandaSiri · 26/03/2026 14:05

nauticant · 26/03/2026 13:43

As I understand things, people with PAIS and CAIS have the SRY gene. Which means this could be a broad and useful prohibition against males in the female category.

Edit: Ahh, should have read more carefully, CAIS will have its own loophole.

Edited

Gah.
I'm with you! I hate to be a curmudgeon but I surely male CAIS athletes should also be prohibited from competing in the female category. All males should be because the category is for females.
The policy focuses on the effect of testosterone, but male muscle and skeletal development is still different to female, and confers an advantage - albeit much smaller - regardless of the inability to benefit from testosterone.
This policy is much better and much clearer than the previous dog's dinner but it is still not entirely fair to women and girls. Plus the restriction of its application to elite competition undermines the whole policy.

ItsCoolForCats · 26/03/2026 14:06

From what I have seen so far, the policy looks great. I can't see any loopholes. Please let this be the beginning of the way back to sanity for many other orgs.

Bobblebottle · 26/03/2026 14:09

Does this mean olympic boxing will have to follow these rules or is it still devolved to World Boxing?

PauliesWalnuts · 26/03/2026 14:09

Fantastic news!

Helleofabore · 26/03/2026 14:10

WandaSiri · 26/03/2026 14:05

Gah.
I'm with you! I hate to be a curmudgeon but I surely male CAIS athletes should also be prohibited from competing in the female category. All males should be because the category is for females.
The policy focuses on the effect of testosterone, but male muscle and skeletal development is still different to female, and confers an advantage - albeit much smaller - regardless of the inability to benefit from testosterone.
This policy is much better and much clearer than the previous dog's dinner but it is still not entirely fair to women and girls. Plus the restriction of its application to elite competition undermines the whole policy.

I suspect that there will be more research and performance reviews about those athlete's performance.

OP posts:
Helleofabore · 26/03/2026 14:12

Bobblebottle · 26/03/2026 14:09

Does this mean olympic boxing will have to follow these rules or is it still devolved to World Boxing?

From memory, any Olympic sport will need to follow these guidelines at a minimum.

OP posts:
Tiddlywinkly · 26/03/2026 14:13

That's great news. Sadly, a tad late. I assume it's not retrospective?

murasaki · 26/03/2026 14:15

The Guardian has picked it up and even says that Khelif has male chromosomes. Took them long enough.

Helleofabore · 26/03/2026 14:15

Tiddlywinkly · 26/03/2026 14:13

That's great news. Sadly, a tad late. I assume it's not retrospective?

No. It does say it is not in the new policy sadly.

OP posts:
murasaki · 26/03/2026 14:16

Tiddlywinkly · 26/03/2026 14:13

That's great news. Sadly, a tad late. I assume it's not retrospective?

It won't be. Although they do manage to redistribute medals after time delayed doping violations come to light, so they could.....but they won't.

WandaSiri · 26/03/2026 14:16

For those asking, the policy is not retroactive.

ItsCoolForCats · 26/03/2026 14:16

I just saw a clip on Sky News where the reporter must have said biological sex and biological women about 20 times 🤭 Heads will be exploding all over the country at such transphobic language, what with biological sex being such a nebulous category, apparently.

Helleofabore · 26/03/2026 14:21

I am also going to be watching Sports Australia for their reaction too. I hope that Kieran Perkins will finally acknowledge this.

OP posts:
AnAlpacaForChristmasPleaseSanta · 26/03/2026 14:21

ItsCoolForCats · 26/03/2026 14:16

I just saw a clip on Sky News where the reporter must have said biological sex and biological women about 20 times 🤭 Heads will be exploding all over the country at such transphobic language, what with biological sex being such a nebulous category, apparently.

Poor old India Willoughby has had to flee to Germany to escape hearing such hurty words, like No. With any luck they'll stay there.

ItsCoolForCats · 26/03/2026 14:22

I wonder if FIFA will move now?

NotDarkGothicMama · 26/03/2026 14:23

About time. It's a pity this decision has come too late for the women injured or displaced by male athletes.

Helleofabore · 26/03/2026 14:23

I really hope so ItsCoolForCats.

I also suspect some player retirements will be announced for FIFA when they finally change the policy.

OP posts:
Bobblebottle · 26/03/2026 14:25

Helleofabore · 26/03/2026 14:12

From memory, any Olympic sport will need to follow these guidelines at a minimum.

Thanks, that should be interesting to see what happens with Lin Yu Ting

tobee · 26/03/2026 14:27

I got news notifications on my phone on this. BBC News says “restricted to biological women only” but Sky News goes with “transgender women banned”. I feel like Sky News has gone for the rage bait headline.

It’s about biological women. Their rights, safe guarding and dignity of women. I’m sick of it being all framed around trans women, around men. Setting men up as victims.

loislovesstewie · 26/03/2026 14:28

Just come along to say that this is great news! Just read the article on the Guardian website, God I expect they are crying into their drinks now!

OP posts:
RareGoalsVerge · 26/03/2026 14:29

So as the 15:15 expected time approaches, and we all take a moment to send a message to all the news outlets that this is not banning transwomen from any sport. They are still able to participate in any sport. It is just that they are confirming that the segregation in sport happens on biological sex not gender identity. The compassionate and inclusive response is not to rail against this sensible ruling but to ensure that in all sports the "male" category becomes joyfully and explicitly a gender-neutral open-to-all category where transwomen are fully welcome and included to compete at whatever level their skills allow them to reach without denying their gender identity.

StuntNun · 26/03/2026 14:29

WandaSiri · 26/03/2026 14:05

Gah.
I'm with you! I hate to be a curmudgeon but I surely male CAIS athletes should also be prohibited from competing in the female category. All males should be because the category is for females.
The policy focuses on the effect of testosterone, but male muscle and skeletal development is still different to female, and confers an advantage - albeit much smaller - regardless of the inability to benefit from testosterone.
This policy is much better and much clearer than the previous dog's dinner but it is still not entirely fair to women and girls. Plus the restriction of its application to elite competition undermines the whole policy.

Women with CAIS don’t go through a male puberty and can’t respond to testosterone so there isn’t the huge athletic advantage that males with PAIS have over females. There may potentially be a small advantage as a result of their Y chromosome but it’s difficult to tell whether this makes any difference. Women with CAIS are slightly overrepresented in sport compared to the general population but this may be accounted for by the fact that they don’t have periods which can have an impact on training and sporting performance.