"rabid anti-trans ideological stance"
"hateful rantings"
If this is what you say about a group of parents who believe in single-sex spaces for their children, what language do you use to describe the minority of people out there who truly wish trans people actual, physical harm? I mean the genuine bigots who would swearily abuse trans people in person, and commit acts of violence against them? The ones who argue they should be forbidden any kind of recognition or support?
Because if you use those words for people using the word "boy" as the only way to emphasise that trans girls bodies are different to those of their daughters (which they are, of course, or why would they be trans girls?)...
...You've nothing left for the others. Nothing left to describe the kind of attitudes the Jews faced in Nazi Germany, or Uighur Muslims encounter in China, or the thinking that led to the brutal murder of 8000 men and boys in the Bosnian genocide. Don't these groups deserve the language necessary to describe the horrors they've faced? The above suggests that even "boy" is forbidden them by your standards, or at best reduced to meaning something different to how they would use it. Would you call surviving Bosniaks bigotted simply for using a word lets them verbalise their own understanding of what happened back then?
Hyperbole like yours is both ridiculous and dangerous.
Please don't degrade our language in this way.
It leave people unable to recognise or describe actual prejudice in its very worst forms.