Kellie-Jay Keen (AKA Posie Parker) removed from IWD event by police

[ImTooMessyButImTooClean]

https://x.com/theposieparker/status/2029940578528473283?s=46&t=p6GESSn09HWHVXYgTLIbJg

“My removal from the international women’s day event by the police.

I had been asking women’s organisations whether their services were for women only. This caused alarm and distress and the venue, claimed to be privately owned when it’s owned by the council, asked me to leave for asking questions.

I have footage of every interaction that I will upload later so you can see what those questions were and you can judge for yourself.”

You are lucky you had any fresh milk left she curdles all the milk in my house at the mere mention of her name. Oh bugger, done it again.

Yes.

I've been through the whole thread and I've not seen a single derail that disputes the report that women were removed by police from an International Women's Day event for asking organisations whether their services were for women only.

I wasn't there but I have a hunch that, if there were any credible evidence to the contrary, it would have been posted by now.

You shouldn't need to like KJK to find that disturbing.

I so wish we could have the laughing emoji back.

Did you just use AI to summarise Wikipedia? This is hilarious.

I recommend that you also look at the threads for Moira Deemings case against Pesutto and what the Judge thought of the dossier that someone who was supposed to be doing serious political research but compiled using Wikipedia.

By the way, Jean Hatchet tweeted about going to a LWS event in Sheffield and speaking there.

It has not updated the database about the fact that Jean Hatchet apologised and said she was wrong to have started all that in the first place.

Things PP didn’t say!

It seems so…

But then if anyone looked further than Wikipedia and understood fhe background, they would know that Jean Hatchet has been supporting Let Women Speak and has publicly be seen beside KJK for quite a while yet.

They would also know that any person attempting to fix the errors in that Wikipedia page gets blocked and the page reverts back to false representation edition.

It's absolutely crazy, isn't it?
The question could have been easily answered with "yes, we're a women's organisation only" or "well we also work with men in xyz circumstances".
The fact they can't answer without getting upset is ridiculous.

According to the police officer, she caused ‘alarm and distress’ by asking some people of the service they provided were actually single sex services.
Why that would cause anyone alarm or distress is very odd. Surely you’d just answer yes or no? Maybe they were alarmed or distressed at the thought of being outed by KJK if their supposed women only services actually included men in the definition of women.

Right.
You forgot the part where it was acknowledged by the Australian courts that the people who appeared at the rally were absolutely nothing to do with her? You also forgot the part where not all women may think the same way about everything but that we can all agree with her that men cannot become women and that girls should be guaranteed single sex spaces in schools and sports?
In addition, you’ve forgotten the part where she stands up for girls and women who are victims of grooming gangs and that all of those grooming gangs have one thing in common - they’re male Muslims. Are we not allowed to speak about that?

Nottingham has a large and vocal anti-women contingent.
The phrase "big units" is appropriate here.
All fully supported by local brain-of-Britain MP Nadia Witless.
Tell me they had nothing to do with this.
They boasted of driving KJK out of town when she did the LWS in Notts.
Which, incidentally, Jean Hatchet was at.

Well I'm proud of Nottingham police who have helped to produce a great video clip which will get traction on SM, a thread on MN and peak more people than if they had just ignored KJK.
Seems that the IWD event was run by the Office of the Police and Crime Commissioner for Nottinghamshire, so I can imaging there are going to be questions around their use of the police as bouncers.

Yeah, I would think that it is more that they didn’t want their services to be outed as being mixed sex.

Nottingham is a quiet stronghold of the WPATH child mutilation network so it is no wonder that they will hold out until the whole shitshow collapses, like the preverbial soldier in the forest. It usually keeps schtum on the topic until KJK shines a spotlight on it.

ETA Although Julie Bindel did sue the NCC for refusing to allow her to speak in a small library a few years back. Not sure any of the other TM approved 'Genuine GC Activists' have ever done anything else there in recent times.

Is this a real friend or one of the voices?

https://x.com/WRNDerbyshire/status/2030032560969892031

This. Honestly, the absolute silliness of the TRA stance on everything. It's like listening to a 13 year old. Or a 4 year old. (No offence meant to kids!)

Thank you.

So, a LWS rally was allowed to be drowned out on IWD in Nottingham by a group of largely men, but a group of people centring male people effectively. Because let’s face it, when someone yells ‘trans rights are human rights’ it is not really in support of female people with transgender identities who are protected under those rights that protect female people.

What a remarkable day. When male people are centred instead of female people.

Reminds me that Sal Grover had her ticket rejected for a group of male people holding an exclusively male IWD in Australia. Surely they cannot reject someone legitimately purchasing a ticket when you consider lesbians cannot hold female only events there?

Is this the kind of 'verbal abuse' you mean? Because that's just asking a man to leave a women's toilet.https://youtube.com/shorts/zITVOItE2U4?si=ExxyOp_jZeTzE4vq

"You can dislike KJK and still be outraged that she was ejected from a women's event by asking if organisations for women excluded men"

But she was ejected for upsetting other women at the event. She further said she has video records of all these discussions. Perhaps some of those women were unwilling to be filmed and she obviously filmed them anyway. Regardless multiple women must have complained.

Some of these women might have been employed of whatever organisation they were representing and not in charge of deciding policy but still subject to code of conduct etc.

What would be remarkable is if this interaction with a poster’s friend is not on the hundreds of hours of footage that KJK collects. And collects for her own safety as much as for publishing.

Given that she is collecting footage, I also doubt she would ‘abuse’ someone as she has been accused here on this thread. It would also be remarkable that she would have two conversations with a person with a transgender identity where she mentions god and mentions their mother.

And if she has had more than one of these interactions and the one posted is not the one being referred to, what are the chances that it was ‘abusive’ when this one linked to the thread was not.

I think when the term ‘abuse’ is applied to someone being told they are male when they are indeed male, that perhaps the term becomes meaningless

Why should a person not want to explain the policies of the group or organisation they support on camera?

Is that the original aspect of woman or
the brave new world “womxn” for
whom the crime of upsetting them is as pp, responded to with doxxing, threats of violence, rape, beheading?
So POLICE because they’re ‘upset’ but others being upset is fine?

"Why should a person not want to explain the policies of the group or organisation they support on camera"

Yes because no one has ever been sidelined in their position / been subject to discrimination / fired from their role or has to go to tribunals or court due to their views on "inclusiveness"....