Educational Psychologists Rejecting the School Guidance Around Single Sex Spaces

[ONTHEPREMISES]

These are two senior educational psychologists, both involved in the training of EPs, this week discussing why children should use spaces based on gender ID not sex, why there doesn't need to be caution around social transition in schools and why Cass is wrong.

This is why it's going to be hard getting this ideology out of schools.

Schools are going to be turning to these people as the 'experts' to advise on social transition when they are unsure:

Oh, and they're both blokes by the way.
In case it's not obvious...

Maybe instead of filming YouTube videos they could crack on with assessing kids awaiting their EHCPs.

Dr Cora Sargeant has skin in the game.

Indeed.
And he uses his 'lived experience' to present himself as the expert.

And the idiot EPs lap it up throwing safeguarding to the wind.

Oh it was- it really was

Experts???
If I roll my eyes much more this week, I'll do myself a mischief

Lived experience - wasn’t it this person who joked about the consequences of being looked after by a young attractive nurse on a MS society video a couple of years ago?

Two grown men advocating for males to be admitted to girls' changing rooms? Not a good optic is it.

Didn’t get any further than their insistence we have to use their terminology as it was already tedious.

However yes, while people who have invested their entire life into attempting to appear to be the opposite sex are heavily influencing the situation for children, it is never going to be possible to take a rational and unbiased view of the situation.

That's why it had to go through the SC.

Opinion is irrelevant now. Women and girls have rights under law. End of. Comply or deal with the legal action. People like this demonstrate exactly why those rights are there and are needed.

TW says TW should be given anything they jolly well want because - well they just should, that’s all. Man agrees.

Smug gits

Not sure if you would have seen my AI (ChatGPT) exercise on Substack https://dbuck.substack.com

and matching questions asked of the GROK AI app on LinkedIn?
https://www.linkedin.com/in/dr-david-buck-b6a79747/recent-activity/all/

I left the answers unedited and was surprised at the levels of 'risk' identified on both apps when asking exactly the same questions about the "EDPSY" blog, the "Classroom Psychology" podcast and the BPS! E.g.

These two EP trainers place schools in position of “High Risk” of litigation if their advice is implemented!

You have to be a special kind of psychopath to go into a career that necessarily puts you in close contact with vulnerable, confused, impressionable children and then actively choose to deliberately lie to and betray them like that for your own indulgent made up ideology.

Douglas Murray a while back expressed the opinion that society (mainly the West) losing any ability to say "no" to things, to not express distaste with certain opinions, to refuse to be creeped out/weirded out however outré the phenomenon, are part of the breaking down of barriers which are there for a reason, safeguarding of children surely top of the list.
Why it was so damn clever for the T to parasitically leech onto the LGB, hard fought gay rights giving ultimate cover to the fake analogue of trans "rights".
That's why a man here IDing as a woman can freely flaunt the idea of males in female spaces, including in girls.
And another man just nods along as if it's totally natural, fine and dandy.
And so much of the rest of civic society, including the so-called most intelligent often in charge of public policy including schools, nod along as well.
The autogynephiles currently running this social revolution have worked hard to get this point, and must be absolutely chuffed how the decision makers and allies have fallen in line like useful idiots and nodding dogs.

Yes.

Parents need to be scrupulously careful to avoid anyone like them.

Jesus. This is chilling

When you couple stuff like this with stats that show social workers are more likely to be trans identified, there really is no hope.

It is awful.

Do you have a source for that claim?

Yep

https://x.com/meitham/status/2030379556021145768?s=46&t=A2fpFNgDRyXF2d6ye97wEA

Of the 104,857 registered social workers in England, 6.4% identify as transgender or non-binary, more than 12 times the estimated 0.5% prevalence in the general UK population, according to Office for National Statistics (ONS) figures. Similarly, while 93.6% of the UK identifies as heterosexual, only 81.7% of social workers do—a gap of nearly 12 percentage points.1

im fighting through a mild migraine to be sure my remark is sourced! Had to scroll for a while mind you

Sure, not that I disbelieved you, more that it's such a bold stat.

There was absolutely no mention of the impact on other students

they claim that separating them would be outing, but surely their penises would be outing if allowed into girls changing spaces? M

and don’t girls (especially faith believers) get to consent to which sexes they are naked in front of?

Also, I don’t think it’s outing to have a separate changing area. Most trans student I know want this, they want privacy they don’t want to intrude on female peers but want to be separate from the ‘cis’ male peers too. They almost exclusively have autism so if any really are able to ‘pass’ and they’re challenged about their use of diffenet spaces it’s quite likely to (truthfully really!) say it’s due to their autism needs