GLP v EHRC judgement is coming tomorrow

[DownhillTeaTray]

Listing in the Administrative Court for tomorrow not before 11am: read out of the judgment in our challenge to the EHRC Interim Guidance.

https://bsky.app/profile/goodlawproject.org/post/3meo6ow7ow22k

And no more social transitioning at school without parents knowledge.

🍿

There shouldn’t be any social transitioning if it requires other dc to comply.

🍿

I think that is called swift, justice.

Fingers firmly crossed for tomorrow.

Well the Fox Killah had been hoping for an a "christmas present" ruling, so maybe not so Swift! 😆 But then he got given the PA case, so I guess it all took longer.

Total unashamed derail:
DownhillTeaTray - I'll be watching out for you at Milano Cortina, I think we've a good chance of medalling😁

Da da DAAAHHH!!!

Limbers up

DownhillTeaTray · Today 17:45

Well the Fox Killah had been hoping for an a "christmas present" ruling, so maybe not so Swift! 😆

I'm hoping it's going to be the sort of Xmas present Auntie Eunice used to give in her dotage. A pair of underpants, knitted in orange nylon, with no elastic.

Could someone explain what this case is about please and the ramifications

GLP claiming that the EHRC interim guidance was issued in contravention of the proper procedure, misrepresented the SC ruling, and went beyond scope by mentioning employment as well as services.

(As it has been withdrawn, and nobody took a blind bit of notice of it, I don't know what remedy they had in mind.)

In the alternative, if it (and by implication the currently pending guidance) correctly reflects the ruling, then a declaration of incompatibility is sought between EA2010 and the Human Rights Act.

I'm hoping he'll give them the brush off based on the SC being bound by the HRA and him being bound by their ruling. Or maybe he'll reason it all out from first principles, as he's seen evidence that the first instance court in FWS did not?

I'm not sure that he couldn't avoid ruling on the employment issue altogether, because out of scope, but he heard evidence on it, so could find a sex means sex interpretation of the workplace regulations and that they are not incompatible with the HRA (we can hope).

It's a Valentine present instead 💋

😆

That nice Mr Jolyon is going to explain it tomorrow.

Then the BBC will have its turn. Ah, those halcyon days. ‘Hello children, everywhere!’ said the BBC.

www.bbc.com/mediacentre/proginfo/2014/34/childrens-hour

Lol at Fox Killah, is that his drill name? That & the bad boy PFP are a winning combo

🎶 here comes the fox killah (murderer)
he's a legal griftah (murderer)
excuse me court officer (murderer)
still losing like that (murderer) 🎶

*with apologies to Ini Kamoze

Will be be able to watch this live?

Loving it! "Still losing like that" 😆Nah, na na na nah, na na na nah na na na na nah...

Yes, I dubbed (see what I did there) him Fox Killah, on another thread.

Tomorrow will be interesting...

Thank you for the heads up OP 🤞

Place marking to see the reactions tomorrow

Thank you for heads up - let’s see what happens!

Sex segregation = facism
Gender segregation = utopia

Make it make sense.

He really does though!

Even Maugham knows not to shoot his mouth off about what he's seen in preview until after the judgment is delivered.
If only he could manage similar restraint instead of giving in to tantrums against individual judges when they're unimpressed by a GLP case.

@theilltemperedamateur Is this the outcome of the rolled-up hearing from November? He is so very litigious that I confess I've rather lost track of all his lightly-legalled hissy fits.

Edited to fix an errant hyphen