Mass Shooting in Tumbler Ridge Canada

[fromorbit]

Looks like it was a man in a dress. Another tragedy. More lives lost. Boys with violent tendencies cannot be told they are actually girls. The violent background of trans activism is a problem.

REDUXX
https://x.com/reduxx/status/2021483339719311435

BREAKING

The identity of the Tumbler Ridge shooter can now be confirmed as Jesse “Jess” Strang.

Strang is a biological male who started to “identify” as a "girl" around 2023.

Strang was raised in a family that valued hunting, and began learning how to shoot rifles when he was just a child. Many guns were kept in the family's residence.

Facebook posts from his mother indicate he may have struggled with behavioral issues, including violent tendencies, from a very young age.

Strang fatally shot 10 people prior to taking his own life.

In 2021, Strang launched a YouTube channel that was promoted by his mother on her Facebook. The channel was dedicated to "hunting, self-reliance, guns" and his other interests. At some point, Strang deleted the content on the channel and changed his handle from "Jesse Boy" to "JessJessUwU." The only remaining post on the channel was made 6 months ago and reads "I've been pretty, um, aimless."

The things that never happen just keep happening.

It's almost like these kids need some kind of mental help with their issues rather than hormones and affirmation.

Sky News just had a discussion about how unusual it is for women to do something like this. Anyone relying purely on mainstream media for information is being deliberately lied to. School shootings carried out by teenage boys and young men are the norm. The misogyny is off the scale.

Female in a dress. Rang immediate alarm bells.
Can't help thinking it must have done with most right thinking people

How long are we going to be gaslit about this male crime?

https://x.com/JournalismSEEN/status/2021507665512337628?s=20

Wow, it took a while for my replies on the BBC News FB article to get posted, they are obviously having comments which are "problematic".

Of course it[s hugely unusual. I mean, I[m here because I saw the report and thought the same as everyone else here. Just saying it[s not never happened.

God, this annoys me. Why is it so hard for media to be honest? This was not a woman, it was a trans-identified man. If nothing else, data matter. These are not the crimes of a woman.

More on the ball than me!

To be very it was deleted very quickly it disappeared as soon as I'd read it

This being Canada, it's highly likely to be recorded as a crime committed by a woman.

There will inevitably be a long line apologists lining up with an outpouring of sympathy for this poor, misunderstood woman who was much maligned and rejected by a cruel, heartless proportion of mainstream society, which caused her to need to do this heinous thing. It was clearly a cry for help and an act of desperation against the unfairness of a world that refused to accept her as the authentic woman that she was .

We have all been warned that trans-identified people are at a high risk of suicide so we should hang our heads in shame that we didn't make life easier for her before she felt she had no choice but kill herself while murdering several others. Or some such shit.

Mark my words, tiktok and X and Threads will be full of it.

I miss when we felt bad for the actual victims rather than the perpetrator.

That is EXACTLY what will happen. It will be the fault of evil TERFs: women in general (who are gatekeeping the identity of 'woman' to the exclusion of The Most Marginalised, Vulnerable And Oppressed) and quite probably JKR specifically.

Yes but being confused about actual sex when confronted by an individual in a dress just really isn't a thing. Men and older teen boys still look like men or older teen boys, no matter what they wear. Their gait, their muscle structure. Their lower jaw structure. How they move and run. The descriptor given by an eye witness is more likely to be 'male teenager wearing a dress' than an accidental 'woman in a dress, oh, oops'.

(I meant to reply to the post above the quote)

As a matter of interest I've looked at the wording being used in the Fail.

It says in the main article:
"The shooter, believed to be a woman, appeared to have died from a self inflicted gunshot wound at the scene"

"The attacker has not yet been named and their motive remains unclear. They were described as a 'female in a dress with brown hair', according to an emergency alert sent to phones.

"He did not confirm if the suspect found dead at the school is the same person described as a woman in a dress with brown hair an [sic - this is what the Mail have written) the active shooter alert sent out on Tuesday"

There are no references to gender. So arguably its actually currently worse than the BBC. However it also looks like they are setting up the authorities for criticism in the way they've worded it too.

Radio 2 news at 10.00, still saying ‘described as a female with brown hair, dress’, followed by ‘name and gender not yet released’.

This is a nonsense. I am no researcher, but early this morning, when unable to sleep, I read about this and thought immediately that won’t be a woman. Within 10 minutes I managed to find photos and reports that confirmed that it was indeed NOT A WOMAN.

What I want to know is why is the BBC still reporting this misinformation? How can they justify this? This doesn’t fit within their impartiality, truth guidelines.
Surely an easy win here would be to cut out the ‘female/dress/brown hair’ and just say that the Canadian authorities have not yet released a name or gender of the shooter.

The damage is done, for years to come people will incorrectly refer to the ‘female’ that killed those poor children in Canada.

Could it be that the BBC have to regurgitate whatever Canadian authorities have said and Canadian authorities are very captured?

However it also looks like they are setting up the authorities for criticism in the way they've worded it too.

I don't doubt they are. Because they're as capable as anyone else of looking on the sites that give a name and details of the shooter.

They're sticking by IPSO rules for now, whilst preparing a rant for when/if the truth comes out in an undeniable form. And the rant wouldn't be unjustified.

I think this seems likely.

Interesting sub reddit being mentioned...
... lets see where reporting goes.

Please can posters on this thread be sensible with their posts,

The thread in AIBU has a photo posted which is not of the killer.

Whenever I read about how captured Canada is on the issue of trans, I'm reminded of that excellent documentary that Liz Carr made on the issue of assisted dying. She visited Canada and explored how horrifyingly out of hand and perverse their system of assisted dying has become - how an initially humane impulse has been converted into a grotesque parody of compassion.

There was a Canadian official involved in the administration of assisted dying who was interviewed by Carr, and she was positively creepy, genuinely strange.

All of that seems to resonate with how the trans issue has developed there. A kind society that seems to have corrupted what began as kindness into something surreal and frightening.

I think many of us posting on this board have already seen the pics of the other man floating around with the correction that it is not him. AIBU don’t seem to have caught up yet.

As soon as I saw the first reports of this and they said the shooter was a "female in a dress" I thought, it's going to be a male in a dress.

Even when they are actively involved in mass murder their delusions about gender have to be centred in case feelings are hurt. It is insane.

Not wishing to deflect from this, but assisted dying in Canada is terrifying and I believe the authorities, are using it to avoid healthcare costs on very vulnerable people.

Even after we knew the offender was a male, the BBC were still saying that they were initially looking for a female in a dress. There was no need for that.