Glinner Bullseye comment on X

[Thatcatsaflippingnightmare]

Always trying to explain Glinner to DH, today he showed me on X JD Vance defending murder of the woman by ICE. Glinner had replied something like 'bullseye', as in agreement. I tried to comprehend with "satire?" but he said no he's on Liz truss show these days. I said well he's always been about protecting women and children, he's not suddenly supporting femicide, but the post convinced DH otherwise. Any insights? I'm not on social media

HE was a stalker and and harassed Linehan, even the judge said this.

There's dark money available? Where's mine? CatOfHate's catnip doesn't pay for itself.

'Sophia' needs to respect the right of Glinner to be left alone in public and not stalked and harassed.

HE was an almost adult stalking and harassing Glinner. This was the judgement of the court.

It is FEMINISTS that are reacting to Trans Terrorism; we are given rape threats and death threats, 72 year old women are having their eye sockets fractured, feminists have been beaten up and left with bruises all over their arms and backs, and children are being beaten up by transgirls at school, some girls won't go to school when on their period because males mock them and upend sanitary bins in the mixed gender toilets. You have NO IDEA how bad it truly is. Or maybe you do but don't care because women and girls are acceptable collateral damage in the fight for Male Supremacy. Women and girls have had enough. And we are fighting back. And we mean to win, and we are winning the war. It's really that simple.

.

He was almost an adult, stalking and harassing an older man.

Females have single sex communal spaces. Because our foremother feminists fought hard for them. And we will NEVER ever, ever, ever give them up. So you just need to accept the L and cope.

I will never understand how posters can look at what's clearly a man and call him a woman.

I just could not pretend to be that stupid.

@TransParentlyAnnoyed "Sophia" Brooks went into an indoor feminist meeting and filmed people at very close quarters, ignoring their refusals and circumventing their attempts to block his camera. Footage of him doing this. When men ignore women's boundaries, we rightly name that as abuse.

He repeated the trick outside the venue with Glinner and found out that irascible middle-aged men react a little more... physically... than women do. i believe that the term you are looking for is "fuck around and find out".

That's an interesting question. I know in Australia police are taught to shoot to stop the threat, not necessarily kill. It does seem in America they shoot to kill regardless, ask questions later.

I don't really have much of a view on the shooting tragedy, because of all the conflicting information, I can't figure out the reality or what happened at this stage. I guess more will come out eventually.

In that comment, I used the words ‘I suspect’ rather than ‘I predict’. The meaning is quite different. One is also talking about the past, the other the future.

The one where you click on their name in Companies House, and both organisations are listed.

@TransParentlyAnnoyed You keep accusing Glinner of posting nudes of "Sophia" Brooks. If Glinner was doing this, and it's a big if, how did he get hold of them?

What's your evidence that he did it?

I’ve never seen any proof that he was a “child” in any case and I don’t think he was required to prove it to the courts.

"Don't vote for the right, terrible things might happen, but I'm not going to tell you what they are."

If Glinner had been, do we think there'd have been a million threads about it? Or would it have simply passed everyone by?

Agree.
Including the rights of Renee Good
Including the rights of young Hispanic women being dragged of the street by masked men or harassed in female toilets. It should be possible to do it without making it easy for men with bad intentions.

i can’t tell you what they are before they occur. I would be paid billions if I could perform that trick.

Finally! Common sense does exist!

What does that even mean, 'look at yourselves'? I note there are two posts to your name, both on this thread, so I don't think I'll actually get an answer.

Yeah, I always think that’s an interesting claim. Regardless of the Democrats shambolic campaign, anybody that can justify voting for the moral cesspit that’s Trump in 2024, was never going to vote Democrat.

A lot of people repost things; reposts don't always mean endorsement.

Not one person on the planet is pure enough for some people.

But everyone is flawed.

Any people that rant and rave about how bad some people who believe in biological sex are, whatever their take on it, are more than welcome to post their social media accounts on here and let them be ravaged and picked apart.

My guess is that will never happen.

It is like the Puberty Blocker Trial petition. Loads of people are moaning on X that the wrong person started it. I don't care who started it, I genuinely don't. I don't care who signed it. Good people, bad people, in between people. Don't care. Anything that draws attention and gets this abysmal trial at the top of the agenda again.

Lots of usually Democrat voters did indeed vote for Trump.

It's a shame that Harris didn't have her change of heart about women's sports before the "Harris is for they/them" advert went out, isn't it?

Trump won because Harris was unelectable. She didn't even win a primary, but was bumped up when Biden retired. Her party telling parents that their DDs would have to change with boys was part of her being unelectable. All that stuff with ICE is happening because Harris was unelectable.

Wait... so he through his tweet is somehow 'responsible' for other people attacking her? I think this is gaslighting, really. It's the same nonsense TRAs do when they blame Rowling for people tweeting bad things at trans people. They even blamed JK Rowling personally for Brianna Ghey's death. How about we grow up and realise Glinner is not responsible for what anyone else says or does (nor is Rowling, Rosie Duffield, or any other GC person), and put the blame squarely where it BELONGS; on the people making those comments.