Glinner Bullseye comment on X

[Thatcatsaflippingnightmare]

Always trying to explain Glinner to DH, today he showed me on X JD Vance defending murder of the woman by ICE. Glinner had replied something like 'bullseye', as in agreement. I tried to comprehend with "satire?" but he said no he's on Liz truss show these days. I said well he's always been about protecting women and children, he's not suddenly supporting femicide, but the post convinced DH otherwise. Any insights? I'm not on social media

What do you expect us to say? "Glinner retweeted something awful, and Glinner thinks women don't have penises, therefore women must be able to have penises"?

Glinner put his head above the parapet fairly early on and it cost him a lot. He's since said some very nasty things. The two can both be true. Again, enough with the purity spiralling and guilt by association.

Well said.

Again, you don’t have a crystal ball.

Have you ever heard the term ‘white sepulchre’’? I think that applies here. It looks good on the outside, but inside is packed with corruption. It is women, ultimately, that could pay the price. And I see you do admit the EOs were not signed for pure reasons.

The point is that I don’t agree with them on other points, just this one 🙄

The million dollar question.

There are lots of posters here, presumably rather sheltered and not visiting certain male centric subreddits, who think Reddit is the best thing since sliced bread.

David Lammy MP, on trans-identifying men: "I understand that a cervix is something you can have after various procedures, hormone treatment, all the rest of it."

Dr Beth Upton, as in "Peggie v NHS Fife and Upton", claimed to be a "biological woman" in court.

Do you want to carry on spinning that lie that TRAs aren't claiming that people can change sex?

Ooh also grifter Veronica Ivy and India Willoughby. They both claim to be female despite being male. India also claims to have a cervix.

Who has said that exactly?

I don't need a crystal ball when I can read the Harris campaign endorsements from trans groups. She rowed back on men in women's sports in her memoir only after she lost.

You say that women could end up paying the price? What price is this? Women were already paying a price for so-called "trans rights", the price was men in rape crisis centres, men in DV shelters, men in women's prisons, men in women's sports, men in women's changing rooms, men naked and semi-erect in front of minor girls at Wii Spa, the list goes on.

Dworkin said that the only difference between left misogynists and right misogynists is where they place the boot on women's necks. I've told you where the left were already putting and wi continue to place the boot, you tell me where the right will place it.

Plenty of people. I’m not talking about this thread necessarily. But there does seem to be some naivety about it in general.

The vast overwhelming majority of the GC movement are left wing.

Transwomen are not 'unnoticed' when they are in our spaces. Saying males 'have always broken the law and violated our spaces so lets throw our hands up in the air, give in, and let them continue breaking the law and violating womens boundaries and spaces is not an argument you want to run with...
I do not believe there is an uptick in females being attacked and assaulted for looking 'too manly'. So I do not believe your account. Any time a woman question's another woman, when we see them turn around, hear their voice etc, the mistake is obvious. I know a couple of 'butch' lesbians have said they are happy to be asked because they know that woman is coming from a place of safeguarding the space. It seems only trans activist women with an agenda ever take offence. Women and girls are too afraid to confront these men by and large, and, you are ignoring the fact women and girls would not be on high alert, if males had no been violating those spaces, in the first place! What you are doing is victim-blaming women for naturally being on high alert for something males did. See my image.

Glinner was being stalked and harassed by another (trans identified) male. That is what the court found, too. Glinner was the victim. The other male was the instigator. Are you saying Glinner should have just put up with being harassed, stalked and a phone constantly put in his face? Would you just put up with that and take it? Well would you?

Lastly, I cannot remember any time any GC person, here or anywhere, was reacting with any 'glee' over a teenager's murder (I presume you are talking about Brianna Ghey? If it is someone else, please correct me), I think you are outright lying there and making it up on the spot. What I saw were trans activists basically salivating at the death as a chance to weaponise it and promote their agenda.

Please provide evidence of him doing any of this at all.

So not this thread. No, we’re not naive, thanks.

Not naive about how much of a misogynistic cesspit Reddit is? Glad to hear it.

I don’t know. I don’t have a crystal ball.

Anything to say about the actual points @selffellatingouroborosofhate made, based on your own comment in which you were quite happy to make predictions without a crystal ball? 🙄

You obviously didn't do your research well at all. This is only 5 as there is a 5 image limit per post but I have a lot more than that (and by the way, it's not just about assault, but about privacy and dignity away from the male gaze):

Oh and here's two videos of two males being in the ladies in states of arousal (so advance fair sensitivity warning to readers, note there is not actual nudity they are clothed):
https://x.com/SalemThe5th/status/1978609255239594394

https://x.com/listen2tish/status/2007959774604984591

Harris, Biden and the democrats handed the election to Trump and we are watching the consequences.
Honestly, if an aggressive man pointed a gun at me and was yelling in the midst of a hubbub of noise, I would be so terrified I wouldn't be able to follow an instruction, make a sensible decision or react calmly at all.
I doubt that many people would.

Oh not those 'now any male can masquerade as a trans man' bs argument that has been debunked literally 40 thousand times over. We know what a male looks like, we even know what a trans man looks like. They look like small furry and hairy females. Most of the time we can still tell. That now they'll pretend their trans man bs is a last dying gasp desperate attempt from trans activists to defend their attack on the sex-based spaces of the female sex. And we're not buying it. We never did, we don't know. We see through it for what it truly is.

Any male causes an issue to women, girls, and women like me with rape survivor trauma when they are in our spaces. And transwomen sexually offend at 5 times higher the rate that so-called 'c1s' males do.

Yep, I picked that up too. Only Trans Ideologists deep in the cult who have never been feminist or Gender Critical would ever use those cult buzzwords.

So you want me to choose a known and awful for women outcome over a partly unknown and partly good for women outcome?

The US electorate thought that was a terrible idea too.

Germaine Greer was GC in the 1970s, she wrote warning of transvestite males entering female spaces in 1979. Is Greer a fascist?
The UK Communist party manifesto is pro GC. Are they fascist?

No, neither of them are. You've been brainwashed by patriarchal tin foil hat conspiracist propaganda. And you can't see it.

I'm several pages back, so it may still happen, but I wouldn't be surprised if that poster starts bringing up lizard people and adrenochrome or whatever the substance is.

You mean the boy who was harassing Glinner, and the judge found that, too?

You don't care about fully intact nude males, some with erections, (vis WiSpa and other toilet episodes) being in women and girls locker rooms, now you're going to pretend you care about people posting nudes? Pick a lane and stick to it.