I agree with this. It is public attempt at manipulating someone.
But also shows that those doing this have no idea what MN actually is, other than media cliches about it. ie the poltical interviews, the biscuit question.
First of all Justine Roberts owns the web site. She isn't the editor, nor the policy maker of what the site is substantially ie a wide range of posters who will argue every point, sometime for no reason than to have an arguement! Nobody speaks for MNers!
There isn't any precedent for JR to decide as an individual that MN (its thousand of users) say about an issue.
I said in an earlier thread trying to exploit her in public is disgusting.
But they could have, for instance, asked for a guest post (with a poll?). And be prepared to engage with the range of responses they would get. First of all it would make them have to be prepared to argue through what they believe, and do a lot more brain work than signing some virtue signally statement.
Even if, in some bizarre way, their attempt at manipulation means JR makes a policy statement, it will only be her own opinion.
And certainly one that the majority of posters on MN would then pick apaprt. In a sisterly way of course!
So as much as anything JR should NOT give in to this claque of luvvies as it would be a betrayal of what the web site actully represents.
Worse still if she did give in' and somehow appears to have responded to their pressure, she will leave herself open to a wide range of self important campaigners who will demand that she should promote their view point.
(I had thought of posting something like this on site stuff but cant quite make the points I want to make. But basically "free mumsnet from interferring outsiders"!)