This is what was said:
TS: There was one of your patients, one of Gender GP's patients, who was diagnosed with autism. This is Child J, 15 years old, diagnosed with autism and anorexia in 2020, sectioned under the Mental Health Act for treatment in 2021 after incidents of self-harm. First made contact with Gender GP in October 2022 with support of his mother. Two months later, after a fee was paid and a questionnaire completed, a prescription was issued for testosterone and puberty blockers. What medical assessments had been carried out by Gender GP on that child's needs?
HW: Well, how am I supposed to know who J is, what, who the doctor was, what assessments were done? You need to give me a few more details, or what? You want me to share medical records online with you today?
TS: What is the process then by which a child diagnosed with autism and anorexia, sectioned under the Mental Health Act, would be able to get a prescription for testosterone?
HW: You missed the diagnosis of gender incongruence there, was that deliberate or you're just not admitting that?
TS: It doesn't suggest that there is one.
HW: Then why would they prescribe the medicine for gender incongruence?
TS: You tell me, it's your organisation.
HW: Well, it's my organisation but does that make me responsible for every single thing? But, but, listen a doctor wouldn't prescribe testosterone....
TS: The every single thing is that this child was prescribed a potentially fatal dose of testosterone.
HW: If this is the case that you're talking about in The Times I am not and can't talk about that today. But from a medical point of view you would prescribe testosterone to a child if they had a diagnosis of gender incongruence.
TS: The judgment says no medical examination or blood testing....
HW: Tom, I'm not able, I cannot talk about that case.
TS: I'm just making it clear to my listeners - no medical examination, blood testing or other clinical evaluation was undertaken. Child J had not had any direct communication with a doctor at any stage during the referral.
HW: How the hell did he get his prescription then?
TS: You would have prescribed it.
HW: Me?
TS: Gender GP. Your organisation.
HW: Gender GP. (mumbled) not LBC. A doctor... you can't get a prescription from an organisation. You can't get a prescription from me. So let's just be clear to your listeners (sarcastic tone) who you're guiding down this conversation, a doctor will have made an assessment and written a prescription.
TS: Again, the judgment says there was no direct communication with a doctor at any stage during the referral...
HW: I can't talk about that judgment.
TS: Well you just said, you just suggested that there was...
HW: I am talking generally about the way medicine works.