From NW
NC the 3 July email - its status appears to be in doubt in this claim. SD does not deal with it in his subs. As a matter of fact the 3 July must be dealt with - even if SD persuades you it was not part of C's pleaded case. It's nevertheless of enormous relevance
... it is a set of facts or fact of the most enormous evidential sig. So the reason behind that email being sent is something the tribunal will have to determine. If that email was sent with wholly innocent intent the contention in q would fail. If you find...