Glamour Magazine UK celebrates nine men as Women Of The Year

[PoetryEmotion]

As trans rights face increasing threat in the UK, Glamour honours nine of the community's most ground-breaking voices at this year's Women of the Year Awards. From fashion and music to charity and activism work, these trailblazers work tirelessly to empower, uplift and celebrate trans voices.

And naturally the article is written by Shon Faye 🙄

Archive link, so as not to give them the clicks:

https://archive.is/MiNAL

A fantastic article! Thanks for sharing. This bit tickled me as well.

Andrew Tate, that arch-hater of women, has a routine where he talks about how it’s ‘gayer’ to have sex with an ugly woman than with a beautiful transvestite. Wouldn’t it be great if these two could get together and take each other off the market? Because despite their apparent differences, Tate and Bergdorf – both strange, sexually-tormented outliers of the men’s rights movement – are two testicles of the same scrotum.

I might have to steal ‘two testicles of the same scrotum’ at some point.

Victoria Smith has a small piece in Unherd about this:

https://unherd.com/newsroom/glamour-magazines-trans-cover-shames-women/

https://archive.is/HG4G8

‘Protect the dolls’ is misogynistic, objectifying crap. Every time I see it it reminds me of Andrea Chu Long saying that the epitome of woman was “an open mouth, an expectant asshole, blank, blank eyes.”

I ticked "agree," but on second thoughts, I'd rather not!

Yup. I don’t think you are wrong. Every protect the dolls t shirt should have this further elaboration printed on it too. So the women wearing them know exactly what it means – the dolls believe real women’s normal, healthy genitals smell. And I’m shocked The Times article didn’t use this quote. It’s horrific but sums up exactly who they are and what they think of us. Both them and the mag.

https://www.condenast.com/brands

For avoidance.

https://www.condenast.com/privacy-pages/uk/complaints/policy

'UK Editorial Complaints Policy
The Condé Nast Publications Ltd.
We take all complaints about editorial content seriously and are committed to abiding by the Independent Press Standards Organisation ("IPSO”) rules and regulations and the Editors' Code of Practice that IPSO enforces (the "Editors' Code").

1. What is a complaint?

When making a complaint, you must clearly state that your complaint is a formal complaint under this policy.

1. What does this policy cover?

This policy only applies to complaints about editorial content in our publications and digital services that we control in the UK, Channel Islands and Isle of Man. It does not cover: Complaints about TV and radio services (which is regulated by Ofcom, ATVOD and/or the BBC Trust) complaints about advertising (as that is regulated by the Advertising Standards Authority); concerns about matters of taste/decency and due impartiality; complaints about books; complaints about 'user generated content' (i.e. material on our digital services e.g websites or apps that was not posted by us or on our behalf) which we have not reviewed or moderated; any complaint that falls outside the remit of IPSO

1. How we deal with complaints

Complaints will only be accepted within four months from the date of the behaviour or first publication of the article that you are complaining about. Where an article remains accessible on our website, complaints will be accepted up to 12 months from the date of the behaviour or first publication of the article that you are complaining about. We will consider complaints from (a) any person who has been directly affected by the matter complained of; or (b)from a representative group affected by an alleged breach of the Editor's Code which is significant and of substantial public interest; or (c) from a third party seeking to correct a significant inaccuracy of published information We reserve the right to reject, without further investigation, complaints that show no breach of the Editor's Code; or that are trivial, hypothetical, gratuitously abusive or offensive, or otherwise vexatious or insignificant; If you are taking legal action, we may be unable to consider your complaint.

1. What happens to your complaint?

The complaints process is free of charge irrespective of the outcome of your complaint We aim to acknowledge your complaint within 5 working days of receipt. You agree to respond promptly to any request for further information. If we receive multiple complaints about the same issue we may make one response to all. We will resolve your complaint within 28 days of receiving everything we need from you to allow us to investigate. If we fail to meet this timescale, you can take your complaint to IPSO. We will always treat you courteously and with respect. We expect the same from you.

1. Complaint to IPSO on exhaustion of our complaints procedure

If you are unhappy with our final response to your complaint you may complain to IPSO. IPSO offers without charge a complaints handling service to the public in cases where there has been a disagreement between a complainant and us about whether the Editors Code has been breached. We will be asked to confirm that our complaints procedure has been exhausted and will do so in writing.

1. Policy Changes

We reserve the right to amend this policy as required to ensure compliance with IPSO regulations. We will publish the current policy on our website. Your complaint will be considered against the published policy on the date of receipt of your complaint.

1. How to complain

When making your complaint, you must include: a copy of the article in question, or a link to the relevant webpage or a web address, if the complaint is about published material (or reference to the publication title, issue date, page and article title if a copy is unavailable); a written explanation of your concerns with reference to the Editors' Code any other documents that will help us assess your complaint. Complaints received without this information cannot be considered. We may seek further details after your initial contact. If you cannot provide the requested information we may be unable to consider your complaint. Please send your complaint to the relevant inbox: ... Glamour: [email protected] '

I hadn’t read that before, it was glorious.

Thanks @Helleofabore

A few days back Glamour Mag decided to really lean in to their stance:

https://x.com/OkayBiology/status/1991141579617108261

archive.ph/PrMVn - scroll down to find the photo with its porny overtones

But then the UK Supreme Court ruled that trans women with Gender Recognition Certificates aren’t protected against sex discrimination under the Equality Act.

That's just not true. This is such an irresponsible and ignorant article.

Nobody is preventing any of these people from playing mixed sex football or setting up a mixed sex league if that is what they want to do.

The mainstream media need to pick up this story and include the attached image.

Because it exemplifies the depth of lunacy women are facing...even from within our own ranks. 😡

It's an astonishing image but even more astonishing is that the people who created it seem to be unaware of what they've revealed in terms of the true nature of genderism.

Excellent.

"Bergdorf is one of those rich transvestites who’ve spent a fortune on facial surgery – unlike the poor ones, who tend to resemble bricklayers – but it hasn’t really worked, unless the aim was to look like something off Doctor Who. "

Yes, whoever thought a woman kissing the filthy shoe of a man was a symbol of acceptance and female empowerment?

I am really beginning to wonder how long Conde Nast will continue to indulge Glamour Magazine UK with all this trans nonsense. Will it go the same way as Teen Vogue?

It's a free website without much content.

Had anybody clicked on it recently for any other reason?

Perhaps this is the business plan.

That image of a young woman kissing a man's muddy boot is just disgrace. It shows exactly what the real TG agenda is, total submission of women to men pretending to be women.

While cupping a ball in one hand. With her having her thighs wide open.