Meet the Other Phone. Only the apps you allow.

Meet the Other Phone.
Only the apps you allow.

Buy now

Please or to access all these features

Feminism: Sex and gender discussions

Muslim charity run

1000 replies

Thomasina79 · 12/10/2025 08:10

Has banned women and girls over the age of 12 from participating. Thoughts?

OP posts:
Thread gallery
12
Thissickbeat · 12/10/2025 09:27

forcrafty "it’s surely exactly what we would be campaigning for over on the sex and gender boards.".

No, men and women always run together and it's fine. Every marathon, 5k and trail race is open to both sexes.

BetFreda · 12/10/2025 09:27

Perhaps our complaints should be made to the council for allowing a discriminatory event to take place on their land. https://towerhamletsportal.icasework.com/resource?id=20231742&db=towerhamlets

Linenpickle · 12/10/2025 09:27

This charity is subject to a regulatory warning by the charity commission. No one should be donating to them, noting that their income was over £5m somehow.

it is disgraceful. This is an example of why this country has gone to pot.

Shedmistress · 12/10/2025 09:27

ForCraftyWriter · 12/10/2025 09:23

I can’t see any problem with a women’s charity race. Nor a men’s charity race. Nor a men’s or women’s competitive race. That it’s bundled in a “Muslim” wrapper makes no difference at all.

This isn't a 'men's' charity race. It is for everyone apart from females 12 and over. Do you not think there is a problem with that?

ThatSpryShaker · 12/10/2025 09:28

User37482 · 12/10/2025 09:23

Sikhs and Hindus 2nd gen onwards basically just marry people they have been dating. You may get some help with introductions but arranged marriages are not really a thing for those groups anymore. I literally don’t know anyone after my parents generation who has had an arranged marriage, actually some of my aunts are married to men they dated at uni.

I also don’t think such a large differential is due to just missing all the other girls. Thats a massive gap, 7% from India and 93% from muslim majority countries. I really don’t think there are loads of sikh girls being forced into marriage that just hasn’t been uncovered.

Obviously there should be zero and if someone tries to force a marriage then they should be denounced by the community and prosecuted to the fullest extent of the law as far as I’m concerned and I don’t give a fuck if they happen to be a member of my particular demographic, abuse is abuse, they aren’t absolved of responsibility and I don’t think they make me look bad, they make themselves look bad.

We should be rooting out discrimination against women wherever we find it, not turning a blind eye because of religion or colour. I want my DD to live in a country where she is seen as equal citizen first and has exactly the same rights and protections as a white woman. Anything less than that is not satisfactory. I will include muslim women in my feminism because they are women. Asking other women to ignore it because it’s uncomfortable is poor. It’s saying that as a country we will tolerate bad behaviour from a religious community as long as it is only targeted at the women within it.

That is absolutely not true. Love marriages are about as equally common in all South Asian communities in the UK. They happen more often among all religions, but arranged and forced marriage are also a feature.

Anecdotally, in my London girls' school, the girls least likely to go onto further education because they were getting married where Sikh. Hindus next. The vast majority of Muslims were going to college. We did this internal study for Sociology ourselves in the academic year 2000-2001. East London school. 180 girls.

RedToothBrush · 12/10/2025 09:28

Keepoffmyartichokes · 12/10/2025 09:23

Whilst I do agree this is very wrong I wonder if there was the same public outcry back when the Race for Life excluded men. It was only from 2019 when men were allowed to enter that race.

This doesn't fall foul of the Equality Act because of the presence of a legitimate aim.

Women participate less in sport and are more likely to do so without the presence of men. So the legitimate aim is to improve women's health, increase health awareness for women and to increase inclusion of women.

A male only race for Muslim men COULD have similar arguments EXCEPT it falls foul of that because it then includes girls to a certain age. That's clear and deliberate sex discrimination using religion as an excuse. That's not ok. It's not integral to worship and it asks questions about what efforts are being made for Muslim women's sport where uptake is even lower.

BunfightBetty · 12/10/2025 09:30

ThatSpryShaker · 12/10/2025 09:11

You shoukd spend your energy addressing the issues that are in your home before you think about what might be happening elsewhere. Nice boys from good homes are raping their girlfriends because they dont understand consent. Male bosses are oppressing and sexually harassing their female employees and colleagues. These are issues from your community and haven't been solved. Focus on those. It will be better for everyone.

When you say ‘your community’, what are you referring to?

Shedmistress · 12/10/2025 09:31

RedToothBrush · 12/10/2025 09:28

This doesn't fall foul of the Equality Act because of the presence of a legitimate aim.

Women participate less in sport and are more likely to do so without the presence of men. So the legitimate aim is to improve women's health, increase health awareness for women and to increase inclusion of women.

A male only race for Muslim men COULD have similar arguments EXCEPT it falls foul of that because it then includes girls to a certain age. That's clear and deliberate sex discrimination using religion as an excuse. That's not ok. It's not integral to worship and it asks questions about what efforts are being made for Muslim women's sport where uptake is even lower.

What would be the 'legitimate aim' to this 'no females 12 or over' restriction?

I'm guessing if we made a suggestion as to why, we'd get banned from here.

ThatSpryShaker · 12/10/2025 09:31

RedToothBrush · 12/10/2025 09:28

This doesn't fall foul of the Equality Act because of the presence of a legitimate aim.

Women participate less in sport and are more likely to do so without the presence of men. So the legitimate aim is to improve women's health, increase health awareness for women and to increase inclusion of women.

A male only race for Muslim men COULD have similar arguments EXCEPT it falls foul of that because it then includes girls to a certain age. That's clear and deliberate sex discrimination using religion as an excuse. That's not ok. It's not integral to worship and it asks questions about what efforts are being made for Muslim women's sport where uptake is even lower.

What is the participation in sport like specifically for observant Muslim men?

ThatSpryShaker · 12/10/2025 09:32

BunfightBetty · 12/10/2025 09:30

When you say ‘your community’, what are you referring to?

The community of the poster I am talking to. Are these problems not present in some communities?

cuberoot · 12/10/2025 09:34

ThatSpryShaker · 12/10/2025 08:37

You know what is fucking hilarious about the uproar around this? British men make jogging a bloody hellhole for women. You know how many women are sexually harassed while out running? So theyre upset at the Daily Mail that Muslim women have been banned from taking part, but when women do take part, Daily Mail type men sexually harass them!

This. I bought a treadmill and run outdoors only for organised races exactly because of this (not only sexual harassment, but insulting, fat shaming etc etc etc)

That said, that exclusion is only an aspect of a bigger cultural problem around girls and women above puberty age, so not sure why anyone would find it surprising.

Shedmistress · 12/10/2025 09:34

ThatSpryShaker · 12/10/2025 09:31

What is the participation in sport like specifically for observant Muslim men?

What would be the 'legitimate aim' for this 'no females aged 12 or over' restriction, in your eyes?

BunfightBetty · 12/10/2025 09:34

ForCraftyWriter · 12/10/2025 09:17

Yes in a women’s race. Men in a men’s race. Men and women in an open race or a race for families.
I don’t see why this is controversial, it’s surely exactly what we would be campaigning for over on the sex and gender boards.

I wonder which posters have another agenda here that’s got nothing to do with women’s rights?

Where’s the women’s race here?

There’s only one race being organised from the mosque. And it excludes females over 12.

Naunet · 12/10/2025 09:34

ThatSpryShaker · 12/10/2025 09:31

What is the participation in sport like specifically for observant Muslim men?

Surely you mean muslim men, boys and girls under 12? This is not a mens run.

EdithStourton · 12/10/2025 09:34

ThatSpryShaker · 12/10/2025 09:21

The Beth Din decide a hell of a lot more than that. There has been an ongoing issue with Jewish women getting a divorce.

Yes, and there has been pressure within the Jewish community to change that. A Jewish man who won't grant his wife a divorce can find himself a social pariah, Jewish women can insist on a clause about the granting of a divorce in their marriage contracts, and so on.

TheywontletmehavethenameIwant · 12/10/2025 09:35

Keepoffmyartichokes · 12/10/2025 09:23

Whilst I do agree this is very wrong I wonder if there was the same public outcry back when the Race for Life excluded men. It was only from 2019 when men were allowed to enter that race.

Did the Race for Life exclude men but allow boys under the age of 12 to compete, otherwise it's a false equivalence.

AllPlayedOut · 12/10/2025 09:36

Yes there’s a big difference in allowing exemptions to fulfil a real need such as Men’s Sheds, which I am a big fan of or a group for women’s mental health for example and those which exclude people out of sexism and not legitimate need such as all the golf clubs who wanted and many still do, to keep women out of the clubhouses due to pure sexism which also meant that many of them were discriminated against not only in regards to sport but also in business and employment as so many contacts and deals are made in the clubhouses.

Grrrrrrrrrrrrrrrr · 12/10/2025 09:36

ThatSpryShaker · 12/10/2025 08:37

You know what is fucking hilarious about the uproar around this? British men make jogging a bloody hellhole for women. You know how many women are sexually harassed while out running? So theyre upset at the Daily Mail that Muslim women have been banned from taking part, but when women do take part, Daily Mail type men sexually harass them!

The solutions to this issue are 1) educating boys that this is unacceptable and 2) actual consequences for the men who engage in such harassment. Banning women and teenage girls from running is NOT the solution 🙄

Bigpinksweater · 12/10/2025 09:36

ThatSpryShaker · 12/10/2025 09:11

You shoukd spend your energy addressing the issues that are in your home before you think about what might be happening elsewhere. Nice boys from good homes are raping their girlfriends because they dont understand consent. Male bosses are oppressing and sexually harassing their female employees and colleagues. These are issues from your community and haven't been solved. Focus on those. It will be better for everyone.

No.

This is all of our country. This is Britain in 2025. We will not turn a blind eye to blasphemy laws, misogynistic policies and extrajudicial courts because the women involved are painted as willing participants.

Does anyone remember Shafilea Ahmed? I always think of her when this issue arises.

JudgeJ · 12/10/2025 09:37

ViaRia01 · 12/10/2025 08:18

It’s a men’s race. I don’t find that disgraceful.

is there some controversy or issue that I have missed?

Ha Ha Ha!

Redberryhot · 12/10/2025 09:37

RedToothBrush · 12/10/2025 08:17

How does this not fall foul of the Equality Act?

It does.

Rosscameasdoody · 12/10/2025 09:39

ViaRia01 · 12/10/2025 08:18

It’s a men’s race. I don’t find that disgraceful.

is there some controversy or issue that I have missed?

It’s only a men’s race because females over the age of 12 have been banned. Surely you can see the distinction ?

YorkshirePuddingsGreatestFan · 12/10/2025 09:39

ThatSpryShaker · 12/10/2025 08:21

Are Muslim women allowed to take part in running competitions generally?

I've ran with a Muslim woman before. She wears leggings with a long sleeved tunic type top that comes down to her mid thighs and a built in hijab. She said it's comfortable and gives her the same freedom of movement as everyone else but still covers her modesty.

ERthree · 12/10/2025 09:40

I am amazed that anyone is shocked.

BundleBoogie · 12/10/2025 09:40

ACynicalDad · 12/10/2025 08:19

Thought about complaining to the park owners, it’s Tower Hamlets Council so no point. So wrong.

This appears to be part of the issue in having Muslim run areas in the country. They feel free to ignore UK law. It is a mystery why the current Mayor of Tower Hamlets, Lutfur Rahman was ever allowed to stand for election again and now he has pushed out all who challenger him and created an environment where they see it perfectly acceptable to run events that exclude women and ignore our laws.

Matthew Swipewright shared a clip in X with a Muslim leader sitting with Humza Yousaf explaining how Muslims like him want more power and influence and are reaching a tipping point where if they don’t achieve their aims, they will do something different. There are a number of Muslims are already in many positions of power at the very top.

From the article linked below

“Toxic” was the standout word from a recent damning report into Tower Hamlets council and how it is run under independent mayor Lutfur Rahman.
A secretive culture permeates a town hall where “many good managers" have quit as a result of "speaking truth to power”, was the thrust of a government ordered investigation.
One councillor told the Standard that the atmosphere inside the local authority was "often dysfunctional and, at best, childish".

When Mr Rahman, a former solicitor, was re-elected the independent mayor of Tower Hamlets in May 2022 it was a comeback that the political establishment dreaded.

Sensationally forced out of government seven years earlier, a specialist court found him guilty of vote-rigging and religious intimidation which resulted in 2014 local elections being annulled.

The election court in 2015 heard Mr Rahman made false statements about his rival Labour’s John Biggs, administered council grants in a way that constituted electoral bribery and spiritually intimidated voters.

www.standard.co.uk/news/politics/lutfur-rahman-tower-hamlets-mayor-aspire-b1205024.html

Please create an account

To comment on this thread you need to create a Mumsnet account.

This thread is not accepting new messages.
Swipe left for the next trending thread