Meet the Other Phone. Only the apps you allow.

Meet the Other Phone.
Only the apps you allow.

Buy now

Please or to access all these features

Feminism: Sex and gender discussions

Always been GC, but now afraid I'm becoming transphobic

674 replies

HouseOfGuineaPigs · 30/09/2025 23:07

I've always been gender critical and 100% in support of safe spaces for natal women only. I'm completely comfortable with being gender critical. But I'm concerned I've crossed a line into becoming a full on bigot, which is something I don't want to be. Due to my own background of mental health and trauma issues I follow pages on this issue on Facebook. I just saw one with a graphic post saying Using Preferred Pronouns Is Suicide Prevention and it made me want to scream and throw things.

I've been suicidal, I've attempted. I've battled see harm and self destructive behaviours since childhood. I should be sympathetic about the struggles people are having . But I feel manipulated seeing posts like that one. I use preferred names when I'm addressing trans persons. I am kind to them, I don't mention their issues. I treat them the same as anyone else. I will call a bloke Sue even if his real name is Bob, it feels odd, but I will do it to be respectful . But calling a he a she is a step too far. I would either use their name or use they.

Why do I feel so strongly that I'm being manipulated ? None of the trans people I know have abused me in any way. They haven't infringed on my boundaries . I have 2 trans friends, another who is non binary and 2 acquaintances. They have all been decent .

I just feel resentful that I'm being made to feel responsible for someone not taking their life because I don't affirm their identity ?

I'm horrible aren't I ? Please sort my head out !

OP posts:
Thread gallery
31
LoftyRobin · 01/10/2025 10:49

Hoardasurass · 01/10/2025 10:46

Yes it does, it removes our humanity. Or in parlance that you may understand better, it invalidates us and our lived reality when you chose not to acknowledge our identity and use our preferred language 😉

So by saying pregnant women and people, I take away your humanity as both a person and a woman?

NeonFish · 01/10/2025 10:49

LoftyRobin · 01/10/2025 08:46

But people in the field of psychology and psychiatry don't agree with your opinion that trans people are mentally unwell. And even if they were, they aren't mentally distressed by being trans identified. So your wish that they feel "well" by not being trans identified is misplaced and rather moot. If you really cared about their emotional wellbeing, you'd support them in being happily trans identified if that's where their happiness lies.

You only want them to be happy if they can be without a trans identity.

So again, you want them to be happy in ways that you agree with and will make life difficult for them if they cannot. You will do that by using whatever power and authority you possess to challenge their identity, and generally speak about them as a monolithic predatory group of people. All because they won't be happy in a way that you find acceptable.

That's a problematic take on life and its inhabitants.

But people in the field of psychology and psychiatry don't agree with your opinion that trans people are mentally unwell.

From researching, many/most in those fields do agree that it is mental illness. Gender Dysphoria is even listed in the DSMV.

HardyQuoter · 01/10/2025 10:51

This reply has been deleted

This has been deleted by MNHQ for breaking our Talk Guidelines.

TheTealPanda · 01/10/2025 10:51

Greyskybluesky · 01/10/2025 10:49

Whut? Do feminists not have hair appointments? 🤔

Of course 😄

It was the poster's tone I was referring to.

NeonFish · 01/10/2025 10:51

LoftyRobin · 01/10/2025 08:52

There isnt any point when there is a whole feminist board dedicated to the group hatred of trans people. For years, people have gotten away with saying the most sweeping statements about trans identified people, why would the site put a stop to it now?

This is just more overwrought transperbole. And it is very manipulative in it's intent. No one here 'hates' trans people.

The issue is men in womens spaces and removing all womens hard won gains.

Hoardasurass · 01/10/2025 10:52

LoftyRobin · 01/10/2025 10:49

So by saying pregnant women and people, I take away your humanity as both a person and a woman?

No not by say pregnant women only by saying pregnant person, birthing person/parent and/or chestfeeder.
Hope that helps 😊

FlirtsWithRhinos · 01/10/2025 10:53

LoftyRobin · 01/10/2025 09:45

I'm not angry or derailing. I am talking about the radical extreme bigoted "GC" views on the site.. it sounds like you want me to shut up about them....

Sigh.

Yes, suggesting you to post a dedicated thread about a topic you want to talk about so it's really visible on the board is exactly the same as wanting you to "shut up".

I apologise for thinking this topic actually mattered to you.

I realise now that you aren't actually bothered by trans maternity support now, it's just about you and your angry feelings from the last thread and your need to be right.

I apologise wholeheartedly for my error in thinking anyone else's interests in this thread or in the original topic should matter when you have things you want to say about a totally different topic.

(I also see very clearly now why you empathise so much with trans people's need to control language.)

Greyskybluesky · 01/10/2025 10:53

Howseitgoin · 01/10/2025 10:41

When we say that people can't change sex, we call that scientific fact. You call it ideological dogma.

You're unable to recognise your dogma because you don't understand what social constructions are. You falsely believe the concept of 'woman' is some sort of never changing set in stone 'fact' when all it is is a socially constructed word based on cultural associations.

Words come in to being by social associations not by a particular phenomena. Phenomena might be related to the concept via cultural association but they are not what determine it. It's cultural associations or agreed cultural meaning. That's why word meaning evolves over time because culture does. Hence 'chair' once only meant a 'seat' but has now evolved to mean a 'position' in a meeting. That they are both phenomena that exist in the world isn't what determines the word its agreed social associative meaning that does.

'Woman', theoretically for most people has biological associations however in practice socially we usually don't know the reproductive traits of a person but determine whether they are a woman or man based on stereotypical associations hence a 'woman' factually can be a person with either biological or stereotypical associations. Now you might say as I'm sure you will 'but stereotypes are wrong' but that's irrelevant to the fact that stereotypes are overwhelmingly used to determine gender.

"Does this apply to everyone, however they want to be referred to? Should I respect Rachel Dolezal's identity as a black woman? Should I respect Stephonknee Wolscht's identity as a 6-year-old girl? What about that bloke who stands in the shopping centre declaring that he's Jesus?

The context here is pronouns & its not as if preferred pronouns don't have any basis in facts as in cultural associations because they do as I just mentioned.

"What about criminals like Isla Bryson and Sarah Jane Baker?
If a male person assaults me and it ends up in court, can he still decide that I should refer to him as he chooses? Whose rights should be more important here? The criminal or his victim?"

If you've ever been in court you might notice alleged criminals are still afforded basic civilities. That they might of committed a crime does not mean they forfeit their rights to be treated humanely.

"But once again, you seem to have forgotten that respect should go both ways. How is it showing respect to me to expect me to lie? That's not respect, it's coercion."

This is silly. You aren't lying. Respecting someones wishes isn't the same as endorsing them.

"It's not about preferences. If I demanded that it was my preference to be referred to as Her Supreme Majesty the Wonderful and Amazing Old Crone, you might (quite reasonably) say no. Would it change your mind if I said I'd kill myself if you didn't (and it would be your fault)? Is it discrimination to say no to my declared preference?"

Firstly, preferred pronouns are based in reality as discussed unlike your examples. Secondly I'm not suggesting suicidality is a justification rather consistency in maintaining social conventions.

If gender identification is a fact, perhaps you could give a definition. Your second sentence seems to be anti-feminist bollocks.

It's interesting that those who claim to be aligned with reality are often those who can't accept it. Something about ideological dogma? Gendered identification with gendered social roles are adhering to societal expectations dictating how individuals should act, feel, and behave based on their gender. That society has certain gendered expectations right or wrong is a fact.

This is one of the most incoherent and inaccurate posts I've read on here for a long time.

You falsely believe the concept of 'woman' is some sort of never changing set in stone 'fact' when all it is is a socially constructed word based on cultural associations.
Words come in to being by social associations not by a particular phenomena. Phenomena might be related to the concept via cultural association but they are not what determine it. It's cultural associations or agreed cultural meaning.

This really is utter nonsense.

TheTealPanda · 01/10/2025 10:54

NeonFish · 01/10/2025 10:51

This is just more overwrought transperbole. And it is very manipulative in it's intent. No one here 'hates' trans people.

The issue is men in womens spaces and removing all womens hard won gains.

No one here 'hates' trans people.

Absolutely, this space is one of the most supportive of trans people I've seen on the internet.

LoftyRobin · 01/10/2025 10:55

EmmyFr · 01/10/2025 10:48

Well maybe that means I've moved from GC to bigot, but I don't want bearded transmen in general breastfeeding groups. Not because I feel uncomfortable breastfeeding in front of them, I wouldn't, but because I would feel horrible thinking of the poor baby being fed artificial hormones in front of me, and I would have trouble resisting the urge to protest. It's child abuse imo. And don't get me started on transwomen "breastfeeding". 😖

We've literally never discussed males lactating on an NHS training course.

Can someone taking Testosterone lactate? I'd assume it would inhibit milk production given that it is used medically for that reason.

But good to know you'd want trans men excluded from maternity services if they pass well enough..

LoftyRobin · 01/10/2025 10:56

Hoardasurass · 01/10/2025 10:52

No not by say pregnant women only by saying pregnant person, birthing person/parent and/or chestfeeder.
Hope that helps 😊

Even if women is included?

Or if you only use neutral terms?

RareGoalsVerge · 01/10/2025 10:56

EmmyFr · 01/10/2025 10:48

Well maybe that means I've moved from GC to bigot, but I don't want bearded transmen in general breastfeeding groups. Not because I feel uncomfortable breastfeeding in front of them, I wouldn't, but because I would feel horrible thinking of the poor baby being fed artificial hormones in front of me, and I would have trouble resisting the urge to protest. It's child abuse imo. And don't get me started on transwomen "breastfeeding". 😖

But most transmen are visually indistinguishable from a butch lesbian. The ones that grow beards are a minority (and still look like a woman with a stick-on beard most of the time). The majority generally should be welcone in any women's space or service they want to use, and do not get genuinely perceived as remotely masculine unless you are discomforted by any woman having short hair and wearing trousers and a lumberjack shirt. The few that don't are the ones who have gone to extreme measures (hyper-body building) to make themselves appear threatening.

Hoardasurass · 01/10/2025 10:59

LoftyRobin · 01/10/2025 10:56

Even if women is included?

Or if you only use neutral terms?

Yes as 9nly women and girls can get pregnant, give birth or breastfeed anything else is ideological dogma that has no place in medicine
Glad to be of help ☺️

tragichero · 01/10/2025 11:00

Hi, I don't really want to comment on the gender issue as I think everyone has already said everything about that.

But what struck me about your post OP is that you are not in any way "afraid" you are becoming transphobic. Because you have done the exact thing most likely to confirm you in your views, by coming onto a site where you know full well many people are proud to describe themselves as transphobic, in the certainty they will endorse and salute your position.

Not saying this to be judgemental or start any kind of argument - I am just pointing out an obvious fact.

NeonFish · 01/10/2025 11:01

LoftyRobin · 01/10/2025 09:45

I'm not angry or derailing. I am talking about the radical extreme bigoted "GC" views on the site.. it sounds like you want me to shut up about them....

I think your definition of what is "radical extreme bigoted" differs from 99.9999% of people. You are calling perfectly normal, scientific, mainstream and standard beliefs "radial extreme bigoted". Have you ever considered the possibility that it is you that is "radical extreme bigoted"?

Greyskybluesky · 01/10/2025 11:03

tragichero · 01/10/2025 11:00

Hi, I don't really want to comment on the gender issue as I think everyone has already said everything about that.

But what struck me about your post OP is that you are not in any way "afraid" you are becoming transphobic. Because you have done the exact thing most likely to confirm you in your views, by coming onto a site where you know full well many people are proud to describe themselves as transphobic, in the certainty they will endorse and salute your position.

Not saying this to be judgemental or start any kind of argument - I am just pointing out an obvious fact.

You assume she hasn't posted on any other sites?
Reddit, for example?
How do you know?

HardyQuoter · 01/10/2025 11:04

This reply has been deleted

This has been deleted by MNHQ for breaking our Talk Guidelines.

NeonFish · 01/10/2025 11:05

This reply has been deleted

This has been deleted by MNHQ for breaking our Talk Guidelines.

rabid, hostile anti-trans rhetoric of MN

Yet no comment about the rabid, hostile anti-women rhetoric of trans activists who threaten to rape, bomb, stab and burn alive feminists. Who pull out their penis and urinate over feminist statues in public. Strangely no comment at that.

But feminists fighting for our most basic human rights are "rabid, hostile anti-trans".

In truth you simply sound rabid, hostile and anti-women and misogynistic.

TheTealPanda · 01/10/2025 11:06

tragichero · 01/10/2025 11:00

Hi, I don't really want to comment on the gender issue as I think everyone has already said everything about that.

But what struck me about your post OP is that you are not in any way "afraid" you are becoming transphobic. Because you have done the exact thing most likely to confirm you in your views, by coming onto a site where you know full well many people are proud to describe themselves as transphobic, in the certainty they will endorse and salute your position.

Not saying this to be judgemental or start any kind of argument - I am just pointing out an obvious fact.

In what way could FWR be described as transphobic?

You're deluded.

HardyQuoter · 01/10/2025 11:09

This reply has been deleted

This has been deleted by MNHQ for breaking our Talk Guidelines.

TheTealPanda · 01/10/2025 11:10

This reply has been deleted

This has been deleted by MNHQ for breaking our Talk Guidelines.

If being 'anti-trans' mean supporting and caring for people with extreme metal illness then I would describe myself as such.

NeonFish · 01/10/2025 11:10

LoftyRobin · 01/10/2025 10:03

No they really don't and actually many women fully support sharing all single sex provisions with trans people. I can tell you that if we were to announce that we are going to exclude trans users from maternity care in any way, the first and loudest protestors would be women.

No "many women" do not support sharing single sex provisions with males at all. And poll after poll shows this. It's a very fringe extreme minority view.

NeonFish · 01/10/2025 11:13

Lougle · 01/10/2025 10:06

Watching a young child with learning disability, who already struggle with traditionally ascribed pronouns, pretzel themselves into using the preferred pronoun of someone who is quite obviously of one sex but is using the clothing and makeup associated with the opposite sex makes you realise how barmy it all is. DD1 was 6 when Tracey drove her bus. She would stumble over her pronouns, doing her best to say the right thing. The look of confusion on her face every time she said 'h-she' 'hi-her' was really sad.

Yes, forcing an innocent child to ignore their instincts and what their eyes see is abuse. No way would any child of mine be forced to ignore their instincts and eyes and mis-sex a person. It is dangerous for them also. I don't understand how people can't see how abusive and manipulative this all is.

Lougle · 01/10/2025 11:14

LoftyRobin · 01/10/2025 10:22

Its funny that all examples are about men being women. I am pretty sure there are more trans and NB people who are biologically female than there are biological males. I dont know why I know that but I'm pretty sure I've heard this figure..for.the UK at least

Yes, and most are young women who are distressed about being female in a world filled with misogyny, who are distressed about puberty. Who think the answer is to deny their biological reality. Most are neurodivergent and actually need support to accept and understand why they struggle in a world set up for neurotypical males.

Nothing about the statistics is surprising.

Also, the reason they examples are about men are because men take advantage of a situation and present as women to gain access to...women. Most women aren't a danger to men, so there are less examples of it.

NeonFish · 01/10/2025 11:19

LoftyRobin · 01/10/2025 10:22

Its funny that all examples are about men being women. I am pretty sure there are more trans and NB people who are biologically female than there are biological males. I dont know why I know that but I'm pretty sure I've heard this figure..for.the UK at least

Perhaps because males oppress females.

It's almost like..... this is about..... I know! Womens rights! Feminism! Not about 'trans' people. But I guess you haven't figured that out yet.